Cargando…

The assessment of a novel lower body resistance garment as a mechanism to increase the training stimulus during running: a randomised cross-over study

BACKGROUND: This study examined the physiological and perceived impact of wearing a novel lower body resistance garment during exercise and recovery. METHODS: Using a randomised cross-over design, 15 recreationally-active males performed 2 × 10-min steady-state runs followed by a 10-min passive reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffmann, Samantha M., Di Domenico, Isaiah, Collins, Paul K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00455-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study examined the physiological and perceived impact of wearing a novel lower body resistance garment during exercise and recovery. METHODS: Using a randomised cross-over design, 15 recreationally-active males performed 2 × 10-min steady-state runs followed by a 10-min passive recovery with concomitant monitoring of oxygen consumption (V̇O(2)), heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE; exercise portion only), wearing either the resistance garment (experimental) or running shorts (control). RESULTS: During exercise, there was a trend for V̇O(2) and RPE to be higher (4.5% and 7.7% respectively) in experimental than control (V̇O(2): r = 0.24, p > 0.05; RPE: r = 0.32, p > 0.05) and for HR to be lower (− 0.4%, r = − 0.05, p > 0.05). During recovery, V̇O(2) and HR tended to be lower (4.7% and 4.3% respectively) in experimental than control (V̇O(2): r = − 0.32, p > 0.05; HR: r = − 0.27, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Though effects were trivial to small, and not statistically significant, these findings provide proof of concept and suggest that this garment design may increase the training stimulus during running and aid post-exercise recovery.