Cargando…

Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND: The etiology of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is complex and currently, there is a paucity of research about the genetic etiology of fetal growth restriction. We investigated the genetic associations and pregnancy outcomes in cases of fetal growth restriction. METHODS: A retrospective a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Meiying, Lin, Na, Su, Linjuan, Wu, Xiaoqing, Xie, Xiaorui, Xu, Shiyi, Fu, Xianguo, Xu, Liangpu, Huang, Hailong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03373-z
_version_ 1784684076891897856
author Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Su, Linjuan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Xie, Xiaorui
Xu, Shiyi
Fu, Xianguo
Xu, Liangpu
Huang, Hailong
author_facet Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Su, Linjuan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Xie, Xiaorui
Xu, Shiyi
Fu, Xianguo
Xu, Liangpu
Huang, Hailong
author_sort Cai, Meiying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The etiology of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is complex and currently, there is a paucity of research about the genetic etiology of fetal growth restriction. We investigated the genetic associations and pregnancy outcomes in cases of fetal growth restriction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 210 pregnant women with fetal growth restriction was performed using karyotype analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-array). The differences in pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) detected by the two methods were compared. At the same time, the fetuses were divided into three groups: isolated FGR (n = 117), FGR with ultrasonographic soft markers (n = 48), and FGR with ultrasonographic structural anomalies (n = 45). Further, the differences in pathogenic copy number variations were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The total detection rate of pathogenic CNVs was 12.4% (26/210). Pathogenic copy number variation was detected in 14 cases (6.7%, 14/210) by karyotype analysis. Furthermore, 25 cases (11.9%, 25/210) with pathogenic CNVs were detected using the SNP-array evaluation method. The difference in the pathogenic CNV detection rate between the two methods was statistically significant. The result of the karyotype analysis and SNP-array evaluation was inconsistent for 13 cases with pathogenic CNV. The rate of detecting pathogenic CNVs in fetuses with isolated FGR, FGR combined with ultrasonographic soft markers, and FGR combined with ultrasonographic structural malformations was 6.0, 10.4, and 31.1%, respectively, with significant differences among the groups. During the follow-up, 35 pregnancies were terminated, two abortions occurred, and 13 cases were lost to follow-up. Of the 160 deliveries, nine fetuses had adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the remaining 151 had normal postnatal growth and developmental assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and timely genomic testing for fetal growth restriction can aid in its perinatal prognosis and subsequent intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03373-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8994287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89942872022-04-10 Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center Cai, Meiying Lin, Na Su, Linjuan Wu, Xiaoqing Xie, Xiaorui Xu, Shiyi Fu, Xianguo Xu, Liangpu Huang, Hailong J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: The etiology of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is complex and currently, there is a paucity of research about the genetic etiology of fetal growth restriction. We investigated the genetic associations and pregnancy outcomes in cases of fetal growth restriction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 210 pregnant women with fetal growth restriction was performed using karyotype analysis and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-array). The differences in pathogenic copy number variation (CNV) detected by the two methods were compared. At the same time, the fetuses were divided into three groups: isolated FGR (n = 117), FGR with ultrasonographic soft markers (n = 48), and FGR with ultrasonographic structural anomalies (n = 45). Further, the differences in pathogenic copy number variations were compared among the groups. RESULTS: The total detection rate of pathogenic CNVs was 12.4% (26/210). Pathogenic copy number variation was detected in 14 cases (6.7%, 14/210) by karyotype analysis. Furthermore, 25 cases (11.9%, 25/210) with pathogenic CNVs were detected using the SNP-array evaluation method. The difference in the pathogenic CNV detection rate between the two methods was statistically significant. The result of the karyotype analysis and SNP-array evaluation was inconsistent for 13 cases with pathogenic CNV. The rate of detecting pathogenic CNVs in fetuses with isolated FGR, FGR combined with ultrasonographic soft markers, and FGR combined with ultrasonographic structural malformations was 6.0, 10.4, and 31.1%, respectively, with significant differences among the groups. During the follow-up, 35 pregnancies were terminated, two abortions occurred, and 13 cases were lost to follow-up. Of the 160 deliveries, nine fetuses had adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the remaining 151 had normal postnatal growth and developmental assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and timely genomic testing for fetal growth restriction can aid in its perinatal prognosis and subsequent intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03373-z. BioMed Central 2022-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8994287/ /pubmed/35397568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03373-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cai, Meiying
Lin, Na
Su, Linjuan
Wu, Xiaoqing
Xie, Xiaorui
Xu, Shiyi
Fu, Xianguo
Xu, Liangpu
Huang, Hailong
Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title_full Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title_fullStr Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title_full_unstemmed Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title_short Fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
title_sort fetal growth restriction: associated genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes in a tertiary referral center
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03373-z
work_keys_str_mv AT caimeiying fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT linna fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT sulinjuan fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT wuxiaoqing fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT xiexiaorui fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT xushiyi fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT fuxianguo fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT xuliangpu fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter
AT huanghailong fetalgrowthrestrictionassociatedgeneticetiologyandpregnancyoutcomesinatertiaryreferralcenter