Cargando…

Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial

BACKGROUND: During the cluster randomised TRIAGE-trial, a nurse advised 13% of low-risk patients presenting at an emergency department in Belgium to visit the adjacent general practitioner cooperative. Patients had the right to refuse this advice. This exploratory study examines the characteristics...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homburg, Ines, Morreel, Stefan, Verhoeven, Veronique, Monsieurs, Koenraad G., Meysman, Jasmine, Philips, Hilde, De Graeve, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07904-8
_version_ 1784684091102199808
author Homburg, Ines
Morreel, Stefan
Verhoeven, Veronique
Monsieurs, Koenraad G.
Meysman, Jasmine
Philips, Hilde
De Graeve, Diana
author_facet Homburg, Ines
Morreel, Stefan
Verhoeven, Veronique
Monsieurs, Koenraad G.
Meysman, Jasmine
Philips, Hilde
De Graeve, Diana
author_sort Homburg, Ines
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the cluster randomised TRIAGE-trial, a nurse advised 13% of low-risk patients presenting at an emergency department in Belgium to visit the adjacent general practitioner cooperative. Patients had the right to refuse this advice. This exploratory study examines the characteristics of refusers by uncovering the determinants of non-compliance and its impact on costs, as charged on the patient’s invoice. METHODS: Bivariate analyses with logistic regressions and T-tests were used to test the differences in patient characteristics, patient status, timing characteristics, and costs between refusers and non-refusers. A chi-square automatic interaction detection analysis was used to find the predictors of non-compliance. RESULTS: 23.50% of the patients refused the advice to visit the general practitioner cooperative. This proportion was mainly influenced by the nurse on duty (non-compliance rates per nurse ranging from 2.9% to 52.8%) and the patients’ socio-economic status (receiving increased reimbursement versus not OR 1.37, 95%CI: 0.96 to 1.95). Additionally, non-compliance was associated (at the 0.10 significance level) with being male, not living nearby and certain reasons for encounter. Fewer patients refused when the nurse perceived crowding level as quiet relative to normal, and more patients refused during the evening. The mean cost was significantly higher for patients who refused, which was a result of more extensive examination and higher out-of-pocket expenses at the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The nurse providing the advice to visit the general practitioner cooperative has a central role in the likelihood of patients’ refusal. Interventions to reduce non-compliance should aim at improving nurse-patient communication. Special attention may be required when managing patients with a lower socio-economic status. The overall mean cost was higher for refusers, illustrating the importance of compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on registration number NCT03793972 on 04/01/2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8994354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89943542022-04-10 Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial Homburg, Ines Morreel, Stefan Verhoeven, Veronique Monsieurs, Koenraad G. Meysman, Jasmine Philips, Hilde De Graeve, Diana BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: During the cluster randomised TRIAGE-trial, a nurse advised 13% of low-risk patients presenting at an emergency department in Belgium to visit the adjacent general practitioner cooperative. Patients had the right to refuse this advice. This exploratory study examines the characteristics of refusers by uncovering the determinants of non-compliance and its impact on costs, as charged on the patient’s invoice. METHODS: Bivariate analyses with logistic regressions and T-tests were used to test the differences in patient characteristics, patient status, timing characteristics, and costs between refusers and non-refusers. A chi-square automatic interaction detection analysis was used to find the predictors of non-compliance. RESULTS: 23.50% of the patients refused the advice to visit the general practitioner cooperative. This proportion was mainly influenced by the nurse on duty (non-compliance rates per nurse ranging from 2.9% to 52.8%) and the patients’ socio-economic status (receiving increased reimbursement versus not OR 1.37, 95%CI: 0.96 to 1.95). Additionally, non-compliance was associated (at the 0.10 significance level) with being male, not living nearby and certain reasons for encounter. Fewer patients refused when the nurse perceived crowding level as quiet relative to normal, and more patients refused during the evening. The mean cost was significantly higher for patients who refused, which was a result of more extensive examination and higher out-of-pocket expenses at the ED. CONCLUSIONS: The nurse providing the advice to visit the general practitioner cooperative has a central role in the likelihood of patients’ refusal. Interventions to reduce non-compliance should aim at improving nurse-patient communication. Special attention may be required when managing patients with a lower socio-economic status. The overall mean cost was higher for refusers, illustrating the importance of compliance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered on registration number NCT03793972 on 04/01/2019. BioMed Central 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8994354/ /pubmed/35395840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07904-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Homburg, Ines
Morreel, Stefan
Verhoeven, Veronique
Monsieurs, Koenraad G.
Meysman, Jasmine
Philips, Hilde
De Graeve, Diana
Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title_full Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title_fullStr Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title_full_unstemmed Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title_short Non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the TRIAGE-trial
title_sort non-compliance with a nurse’s advice to visit the primary care provider: an exploratory secondary analysis of the triage-trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07904-8
work_keys_str_mv AT homburgines noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT morreelstefan noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT verhoevenveronique noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT monsieurskoenraadg noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT meysmanjasmine noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT philipshilde noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial
AT degraevediana noncompliancewithanursesadvicetovisittheprimarycareprovideranexploratorysecondaryanalysisofthetriagetrial