Cargando…

Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire

PURPOSE: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) plays an essential role in health outcomes and quality of life. However, it is often not assessed nor estimated. Objective CRF assessment is costly, labour intensive and not widely available. Patient-reported outcome measures estimate CRF more cost-efficientl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meijer, Renske, van Hooff, Martijn, Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E, Molenaar, Charlotte J L, Regis, Marta, Timmers, Thomas, van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V, Savelberg, Hans H C M, Schep, Goof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S355589
_version_ 1784684153389711360
author Meijer, Renske
van Hooff, Martijn
Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E
Molenaar, Charlotte J L
Regis, Marta
Timmers, Thomas
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
Savelberg, Hans H C M
Schep, Goof
author_facet Meijer, Renske
van Hooff, Martijn
Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E
Molenaar, Charlotte J L
Regis, Marta
Timmers, Thomas
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
Savelberg, Hans H C M
Schep, Goof
author_sort Meijer, Renske
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) plays an essential role in health outcomes and quality of life. However, it is often not assessed nor estimated. Objective CRF assessment is costly, labour intensive and not widely available. Patient-reported outcome measures estimate CRF more cost-efficiently, but current questionnaires lack accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop a new self-reported questionnaire to estimate CRF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The FitMáx©-questionnaire, consisting of only three questions assessing walking, stair climbing, and cycling capacity, was compared with the commonly used Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ). These questionnaires were compared to peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) as measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. This study included 759 cardiac, pulmonary and oncologic patients and healthy persons aged 18‒90. RESULTS: FitMáx© strongly correlated (r = 0.94 (0.92‒0.95) SEE = 4.14 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1)) with measured VO(2peak). Bias between predicted and measured VO(2peak) was −0.24 (−9.23‒8.75; 95% limits of agreement) mL·kg(−1)·min(−1). The FitMáx© scored superiorly on correlation and SEE compared with the DASI and VSAQ, r = 0.75 (0.68‒0.80) SEE = 4.62 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1) and r = 0.87 (0.83‒0.90) SEE = 6.75 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1), respectively. CONCLUSION: FitMáx© is a valid and accessible questionnaire to estimate CRF expressed as VO(2peak) in clinical practice and shows substantial improvement compared to currently used questionnaires.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8994663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89946632022-04-10 Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire Meijer, Renske van Hooff, Martijn Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E Molenaar, Charlotte J L Regis, Marta Timmers, Thomas van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V Savelberg, Hans H C M Schep, Goof Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) plays an essential role in health outcomes and quality of life. However, it is often not assessed nor estimated. Objective CRF assessment is costly, labour intensive and not widely available. Patient-reported outcome measures estimate CRF more cost-efficiently, but current questionnaires lack accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop a new self-reported questionnaire to estimate CRF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The FitMáx©-questionnaire, consisting of only three questions assessing walking, stair climbing, and cycling capacity, was compared with the commonly used Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ). These questionnaires were compared to peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) as measured with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. This study included 759 cardiac, pulmonary and oncologic patients and healthy persons aged 18‒90. RESULTS: FitMáx© strongly correlated (r = 0.94 (0.92‒0.95) SEE = 4.14 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1)) with measured VO(2peak). Bias between predicted and measured VO(2peak) was −0.24 (−9.23‒8.75; 95% limits of agreement) mL·kg(−1)·min(−1). The FitMáx© scored superiorly on correlation and SEE compared with the DASI and VSAQ, r = 0.75 (0.68‒0.80) SEE = 4.62 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1) and r = 0.87 (0.83‒0.90) SEE = 6.75 mL∙kg(−1)∙min(−1), respectively. CONCLUSION: FitMáx© is a valid and accessible questionnaire to estimate CRF expressed as VO(2peak) in clinical practice and shows substantial improvement compared to currently used questionnaires. Dove 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8994663/ /pubmed/35411174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S355589 Text en © 2022 Meijer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Meijer, Renske
van Hooff, Martijn
Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E
Molenaar, Charlotte J L
Regis, Marta
Timmers, Thomas
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
Savelberg, Hans H C M
Schep, Goof
Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title_full Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title_fullStr Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title_short Estimating VO(2peak) in 18–90 Year-Old Adults: Development and Validation of the FitMáx©-Questionnaire
title_sort estimating vo(2peak) in 18–90 year-old adults: development and validation of the fitmáx©-questionnaire
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S355589
work_keys_str_mv AT meijerrenske estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT vanhooffmartijn estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT papenbotterhuisnicolee estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT molenaarcharlottejl estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT regismarta estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT timmersthomas estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT vandepollfranselonnekev estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT savelberghanshcm estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire
AT schepgoof estimatingvo2peakin1890yearoldadultsdevelopmentandvalidationofthefitmaxquestionnaire