Cargando…
Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies
AIM: Optimal management of bladder cancer requires an accurate, standardised and timely pathological diagnosis, and close communication between surgeons and pathologists. Here, we provide an update on pathology reporting standards of transurethral resections of the bladder and cystectomies. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03831-1 |
_version_ | 1784684162947481600 |
---|---|
author | Compérat, Eva Oszwald, André Wasinger, Gabriel Hansel, Donna E. Montironi, Rodolfo van der Kwast, Theodorus Witjes, Johannes A. Amin, Mahul B. |
author_facet | Compérat, Eva Oszwald, André Wasinger, Gabriel Hansel, Donna E. Montironi, Rodolfo van der Kwast, Theodorus Witjes, Johannes A. Amin, Mahul B. |
author_sort | Compérat, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Optimal management of bladder cancer requires an accurate, standardised and timely pathological diagnosis, and close communication between surgeons and pathologists. Here, we provide an update on pathology reporting standards of transurethral resections of the bladder and cystectomies. METHODS: We reviewed recent literature, focusing on developments between 2013 and 2021. RESULTS: Published reporting standards developed by pathology organizations have improved diagnosis and treatment. Tumor sub-staging and subtyping has gained increased attention. Lymph nodes continue to be an area of debate, and their staging has seen minor modifications. Several tasks, particularly regarding specimen preparation (“grossing”), are not yet standardized and offer opportunity for improvement. Molecular classification is rapidly evolving, but currently has only limited impact on management. CONCLUSION: Pathological reporting of bladder cancer is continuously evolving and remains challenging in some areas. This review provides an overview of recent major developments, with a particular focus on published reporting standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8994708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89947082022-04-22 Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies Compérat, Eva Oszwald, André Wasinger, Gabriel Hansel, Donna E. Montironi, Rodolfo van der Kwast, Theodorus Witjes, Johannes A. Amin, Mahul B. World J Urol Invited Review AIM: Optimal management of bladder cancer requires an accurate, standardised and timely pathological diagnosis, and close communication between surgeons and pathologists. Here, we provide an update on pathology reporting standards of transurethral resections of the bladder and cystectomies. METHODS: We reviewed recent literature, focusing on developments between 2013 and 2021. RESULTS: Published reporting standards developed by pathology organizations have improved diagnosis and treatment. Tumor sub-staging and subtyping has gained increased attention. Lymph nodes continue to be an area of debate, and their staging has seen minor modifications. Several tasks, particularly regarding specimen preparation (“grossing”), are not yet standardized and offer opportunity for improvement. Molecular classification is rapidly evolving, but currently has only limited impact on management. CONCLUSION: Pathological reporting of bladder cancer is continuously evolving and remains challenging in some areas. This review provides an overview of recent major developments, with a particular focus on published reporting standards. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8994708/ /pubmed/34554298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03831-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Compérat, Eva Oszwald, André Wasinger, Gabriel Hansel, Donna E. Montironi, Rodolfo van der Kwast, Theodorus Witjes, Johannes A. Amin, Mahul B. Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title | Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title_full | Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title_fullStr | Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title_full_unstemmed | Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title_short | Updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
title_sort | updated pathology reporting standards for bladder cancer: biopsies, transurethral resections and radical cystectomies |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03831-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT comperateva updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT oszwaldandre updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT wasingergabriel updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT hanseldonnae updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT montironirodolfo updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT vanderkwasttheodorus updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT witjesjohannesa updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies AT aminmahulb updatedpathologyreportingstandardsforbladdercancerbiopsiestransurethralresectionsandradicalcystectomies |