Cargando…

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: Visual complaints among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are common, but often difficult to recognize. The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) has been developed to screen for visual complaints in people with a neurodegenerative disease, including multiple sclerosis (MS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Feen, Fleur E., de Haan, Gera A., van der Lijn, Iris, Fuermaier, Anselm B. M., Heersema, Thea J., Meilof, Jan F., Heutink, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00443-0
_version_ 1784684181550268416
author van der Feen, Fleur E.
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Lijn, Iris
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Heersema, Thea J.
Meilof, Jan F.
Heutink, Joost
author_facet van der Feen, Fleur E.
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Lijn, Iris
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Heersema, Thea J.
Meilof, Jan F.
Heutink, Joost
author_sort van der Feen, Fleur E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Visual complaints among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are common, but often difficult to recognize. The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) has been developed to screen for visual complaints in people with a neurodegenerative disease, including multiple sclerosis (MS). A previous study performed a factor analysis in a normal population which revealed an acceptable one-factor model, a three-factor model and a five-factor model within the SVCq. To increase the usability of the SVCq in people with MS, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the fit of the three models in a cohort of pwMS. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis on the SVCq in 493 people with MS showed good fit for all the models. The three-factor model (diminished visual perception, altered visual perception and ocular discomfort) outperformed the one-factor model. The five-factor model outperformed both models, which showed that dividing the first factor (diminished visual perception) into three more factors (function-related, luminance-related and task-related) has merit. CONCLUSIONS: All models may be useful in clinical care for pwMS. The one-factor model may give a quick overview of the presence and severity of visual complaints in general. The individual factors, of either the three- or the five factor models, may contribute to a better recognition of the nature of visual complaints in pwMS and may guide further steps in rehabilitation for pwMS with visual complaints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8994795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89947952022-04-22 Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis van der Feen, Fleur E. de Haan, Gera A. van der Lijn, Iris Fuermaier, Anselm B. M. Heersema, Thea J. Meilof, Jan F. Heutink, Joost J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Visual complaints among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are common, but often difficult to recognize. The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) has been developed to screen for visual complaints in people with a neurodegenerative disease, including multiple sclerosis (MS). A previous study performed a factor analysis in a normal population which revealed an acceptable one-factor model, a three-factor model and a five-factor model within the SVCq. To increase the usability of the SVCq in people with MS, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the fit of the three models in a cohort of pwMS. RESULTS: The confirmatory factor analysis on the SVCq in 493 people with MS showed good fit for all the models. The three-factor model (diminished visual perception, altered visual perception and ocular discomfort) outperformed the one-factor model. The five-factor model outperformed both models, which showed that dividing the first factor (diminished visual perception) into three more factors (function-related, luminance-related and task-related) has merit. CONCLUSIONS: All models may be useful in clinical care for pwMS. The one-factor model may give a quick overview of the presence and severity of visual complaints in general. The individual factors, of either the three- or the five factor models, may contribute to a better recognition of the nature of visual complaints in pwMS and may guide further steps in rehabilitation for pwMS with visual complaints. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8994795/ /pubmed/35397039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00443-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
van der Feen, Fleur E.
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Lijn, Iris
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
Heersema, Thea J.
Meilof, Jan F.
Heutink, Joost
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title_short Confirmatory factor analysis of the Dutch Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
title_sort confirmatory factor analysis of the dutch screening visual complaints questionnaire in people with multiple sclerosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00443-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderfeenfleure confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT dehaangeraa confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT vanderlijniris confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT fuermaieranselmbm confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT heersematheaj confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT meilofjanf confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis
AT heutinkjoost confirmatoryfactoranalysisofthedutchscreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnaireinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosis