Cargando…

Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice

In everyday conversations, professional codes, policy debates, and academic literature, the concept of respect is referred to frequently. Bioethical arguments in recent decades equate the idea of respect for persons with individuals who are capable of autonomous decision-making, with the focus being...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subramani, Supriya, Biller-Andorno, Nikola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10079-y
_version_ 1784684205956923392
author Subramani, Supriya
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
author_facet Subramani, Supriya
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
author_sort Subramani, Supriya
collection PubMed
description In everyday conversations, professional codes, policy debates, and academic literature, the concept of respect is referred to frequently. Bioethical arguments in recent decades equate the idea of respect for persons with individuals who are capable of autonomous decision-making, with the focus being explicitly on ‘autonomy,’ ‘capacity,’ or ‘capability.’ In much of bioethics literature, respect for persons is replaced by respect for autonomy. Though the unconditional respect for persons and their autonomy (irrespective of actual decision-making capacity) is established in Kantian bioethics, current argument and debates often revolve around a thin concept of autonomy, focusing on capacity and capability: persons are owed respect because they are ‘rational beings’ or with a focus on ‘agency’ and ‘decision-making abilities.’ However, these aspects alone are insufficient while engaging the concept of respect for persons, particularly in healthcare settings. This paper sets out to explore if the concept of respect for persons—as opposed to a thin concept of autonomy—could help us engage better in healthcare practices. We shall probe the practical value of the experiential aspect of respect—understood as the recognition of persons as respect-worthy through certain dispositions and deliberative acts—by reflecting on instances in clinical practice that tend to be dismissed as negligible or even unavoidable in a stressful environment such as a busy hospital. We shall argue that these instances are far from trivial but carry moral significance and express an unacceptable—disrespectful—attitude that can compromise the moral habitus in hospital settings. In our conclusion, we call for practicing recognition respect in the health professional–patient encounter by focussing on manners, attitudes, and behaviors. Furthermore, we call for continuous medical ethics education programs to address the moral significance of disrespectful behaviors and their manifestations in particular socio-cultural contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8994924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89949242022-04-11 Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice Subramani, Supriya Biller-Andorno, Nikola Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution In everyday conversations, professional codes, policy debates, and academic literature, the concept of respect is referred to frequently. Bioethical arguments in recent decades equate the idea of respect for persons with individuals who are capable of autonomous decision-making, with the focus being explicitly on ‘autonomy,’ ‘capacity,’ or ‘capability.’ In much of bioethics literature, respect for persons is replaced by respect for autonomy. Though the unconditional respect for persons and their autonomy (irrespective of actual decision-making capacity) is established in Kantian bioethics, current argument and debates often revolve around a thin concept of autonomy, focusing on capacity and capability: persons are owed respect because they are ‘rational beings’ or with a focus on ‘agency’ and ‘decision-making abilities.’ However, these aspects alone are insufficient while engaging the concept of respect for persons, particularly in healthcare settings. This paper sets out to explore if the concept of respect for persons—as opposed to a thin concept of autonomy—could help us engage better in healthcare practices. We shall probe the practical value of the experiential aspect of respect—understood as the recognition of persons as respect-worthy through certain dispositions and deliberative acts—by reflecting on instances in clinical practice that tend to be dismissed as negligible or even unavoidable in a stressful environment such as a busy hospital. We shall argue that these instances are far from trivial but carry moral significance and express an unacceptable—disrespectful—attitude that can compromise the moral habitus in hospital settings. In our conclusion, we call for practicing recognition respect in the health professional–patient encounter by focussing on manners, attitudes, and behaviors. Furthermore, we call for continuous medical ethics education programs to address the moral significance of disrespectful behaviors and their manifestations in particular socio-cultural contexts. Springer Netherlands 2022-04-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8994924/ /pubmed/35397708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10079-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Scientific Contribution
Subramani, Supriya
Biller-Andorno, Nikola
Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title_full Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title_fullStr Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title_short Revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
title_sort revisiting respect for persons: conceptual analysis and implications for clinical practice
topic Scientific Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8994924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10079-y
work_keys_str_mv AT subramanisupriya revisitingrespectforpersonsconceptualanalysisandimplicationsforclinicalpractice
AT billerandornonikola revisitingrespectforpersonsconceptualanalysisandimplicationsforclinicalpractice