Cargando…
The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis
Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is gaining traction as a valuable treatment option for patients affected by severe multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly the relapsing–remitting form. We describe the current literature in terms of clinical trials, observational and retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5 |
_version_ | 1784684255519965184 |
---|---|
author | Willison, A. G. Ruck, T. Lenz, G. Hartung, H. P. Meuth, S. G. |
author_facet | Willison, A. G. Ruck, T. Lenz, G. Hartung, H. P. Meuth, S. G. |
author_sort | Willison, A. G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is gaining traction as a valuable treatment option for patients affected by severe multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly the relapsing–remitting form. We describe the current literature in terms of clinical trials, observational and retrospective studies, as well as immune reconstitution following transplantation, with a focus on the conditioning regimens used for transplantation. The evidence base predominantly consists of non-randomised, uncontrolled clinical trials or data from retrospective or observational cohorts, i.e. very few randomised or controlled trials. Most often, intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens are used, with promising results from both myeloablative and lymphoablative strategies, as well as from regimens that are low and high intensity. Efficacy of transplantation, which is likely secondary to immune reconstitution and restored immune tolerance, is, therefore, not clearly dependent on the intensity of the conditioning regimen. However, the conditioning regimen may well influence the immune response to transplantation. Heterogeneity of conditioning regimens among studies hinders synthesis of the articles assessing post-aHSCT immune system changes. Factors associated with better outcomes were lower Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapsing–remitting MS, younger age, and shorter disease duration at baseline, which supports the guidance for patient selection proposed by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Interestingly, promising outcomes were described for patients with secondary progressive MS by some studies, which may be worth taking into account when considering treatment options for patients with active, progressive disease. Of note, a significant proportion of patients develop autoimmune disease following transplantation, with alemtuzumab-containing regimens associated with the highest incidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8995166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89951662022-04-11 The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis Willison, A. G. Ruck, T. Lenz, G. Hartung, H. P. Meuth, S. G. J Neurol Neurological Update Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is gaining traction as a valuable treatment option for patients affected by severe multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly the relapsing–remitting form. We describe the current literature in terms of clinical trials, observational and retrospective studies, as well as immune reconstitution following transplantation, with a focus on the conditioning regimens used for transplantation. The evidence base predominantly consists of non-randomised, uncontrolled clinical trials or data from retrospective or observational cohorts, i.e. very few randomised or controlled trials. Most often, intermediate-intensity conditioning regimens are used, with promising results from both myeloablative and lymphoablative strategies, as well as from regimens that are low and high intensity. Efficacy of transplantation, which is likely secondary to immune reconstitution and restored immune tolerance, is, therefore, not clearly dependent on the intensity of the conditioning regimen. However, the conditioning regimen may well influence the immune response to transplantation. Heterogeneity of conditioning regimens among studies hinders synthesis of the articles assessing post-aHSCT immune system changes. Factors associated with better outcomes were lower Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapsing–remitting MS, younger age, and shorter disease duration at baseline, which supports the guidance for patient selection proposed by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Interestingly, promising outcomes were described for patients with secondary progressive MS by some studies, which may be worth taking into account when considering treatment options for patients with active, progressive disease. Of note, a significant proportion of patients develop autoimmune disease following transplantation, with alemtuzumab-containing regimens associated with the highest incidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8995166/ /pubmed/35399125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Neurological Update Willison, A. G. Ruck, T. Lenz, G. Hartung, H. P. Meuth, S. G. The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title | The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title_full | The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title_fullStr | The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title_short | The current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
title_sort | current standing of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of multiple sclerosis |
topic | Neurological Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11063-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT willisonag thecurrentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT ruckt thecurrentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT lenzg thecurrentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT hartunghp thecurrentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT meuthsg thecurrentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT willisonag currentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT ruckt currentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT lenzg currentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT hartunghp currentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis AT meuthsg currentstandingofautologoushaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationforthetreatmentofmultiplesclerosis |