Cargando…

Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Since their introduction in orthodontics, clear aligners have been appreciated by patients, including adults, for their comfort and low aesthetic impact. Despite the enormous mobilization of financial resources all over the world aimed at producing new product lines, few clinical studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilello, G., Fazio, M., Amato, E., Crivello, L., Galvano, A., Currò, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00406-7
_version_ 1784684265400696832
author Bilello, G.
Fazio, M.
Amato, E.
Crivello, L.
Galvano, A.
Currò, G.
author_facet Bilello, G.
Fazio, M.
Amato, E.
Crivello, L.
Galvano, A.
Currò, G.
author_sort Bilello, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since their introduction in orthodontics, clear aligners have been appreciated by patients, including adults, for their comfort and low aesthetic impact. Despite the enormous mobilization of financial resources all over the world aimed at producing new product lines, few clinical studies or high-quality evidence have been produced regarding the real effectiveness of such treatment. Given the few limited kinds of research on the subject, this study aims to produce and critically evaluate other data, to establish the concrete reliability of clear aligners in orthodontic therapy. RESULTS: Significant sample sizes were obtained for intrusion, vestibulo/lingual (V/L) crown tipping, and rotation. The overall accuracy for rotation resulted in 86%, ranging from 96% for maxillary central incisors to 70.4% for mandibular first premolars. The intrusion was registered only for anterior teeth; mean predictability was 92%, with the worst result being 86.7% for mandibular canines and the best being 98% for mandibular central incisors. V/L tipping was the most accurate movement: 93.1% of the prescribed movement was completed. Maxillary central incisors showed the lowest accuracy (80.7%), while mandibular central incisors were the highest (97.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided reassuring data in support of the accuracy of the Invisalign(®) system. Vestibulo/lingual tipping was the most predictable movement, while rotation of canines, premolars, and lateral incisors were the least predictable. Intrusion resulted highly predictable up to 2 mm. When careful treatment planning follows a correct diagnosis, together with the use of auxiliary features and refinements, the planned results can be achieved in a clinically successful way. Authors believe that there is a major need for greater samples to overcome bias related to variables if we want to answer the unsolved questions, such as the predictability of severe malocclusions treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89952202022-04-22 Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study Bilello, G. Fazio, M. Amato, E. Crivello, L. Galvano, A. Currò, G. Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: Since their introduction in orthodontics, clear aligners have been appreciated by patients, including adults, for their comfort and low aesthetic impact. Despite the enormous mobilization of financial resources all over the world aimed at producing new product lines, few clinical studies or high-quality evidence have been produced regarding the real effectiveness of such treatment. Given the few limited kinds of research on the subject, this study aims to produce and critically evaluate other data, to establish the concrete reliability of clear aligners in orthodontic therapy. RESULTS: Significant sample sizes were obtained for intrusion, vestibulo/lingual (V/L) crown tipping, and rotation. The overall accuracy for rotation resulted in 86%, ranging from 96% for maxillary central incisors to 70.4% for mandibular first premolars. The intrusion was registered only for anterior teeth; mean predictability was 92%, with the worst result being 86.7% for mandibular canines and the best being 98% for mandibular central incisors. V/L tipping was the most accurate movement: 93.1% of the prescribed movement was completed. Maxillary central incisors showed the lowest accuracy (80.7%), while mandibular central incisors were the highest (97.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study provided reassuring data in support of the accuracy of the Invisalign(®) system. Vestibulo/lingual tipping was the most predictable movement, while rotation of canines, premolars, and lateral incisors were the least predictable. Intrusion resulted highly predictable up to 2 mm. When careful treatment planning follows a correct diagnosis, together with the use of auxiliary features and refinements, the planned results can be achieved in a clinically successful way. Authors believe that there is a major need for greater samples to overcome bias related to variables if we want to answer the unsolved questions, such as the predictability of severe malocclusions treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8995220/ /pubmed/35399128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00406-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Bilello, G.
Fazio, M.
Amato, E.
Crivello, L.
Galvano, A.
Currò, G.
Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title_full Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title_short Accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
title_sort accuracy evaluation of orthodontic movements with aligners: a prospective observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00406-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bilellog accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT faziom accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT amatoe accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT crivellol accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT galvanoa accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT currog accuracyevaluationoforthodonticmovementswithalignersaprospectiveobservationalstudy