Cargando…

Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction

A 53-year-old lady underwent a left total knee arthroplasty. She developed a dermatitis over the left knee on postoperative day 5, which worsened over the next 2 weeks and spread to the trunk despite regular topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. Physical examination revealed an erythemato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Sun, Choi, Ellie, Ng, Yau Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35496506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523740
_version_ 1784684334971617280
author Yang, Sun
Choi, Ellie
Ng, Yau Hong
author_facet Yang, Sun
Choi, Ellie
Ng, Yau Hong
author_sort Yang, Sun
collection PubMed
description A 53-year-old lady underwent a left total knee arthroplasty. She developed a dermatitis over the left knee on postoperative day 5, which worsened over the next 2 weeks and spread to the trunk despite regular topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. Physical examination revealed an erythematous plaque over the left knee and urticated plaques over the neck. She was given a course of oral and topical corticosteroids with resolution. Subsequent patch testing showed a showing ++ reactions to gold and nickel, and + reactions to copper, palladium, rhodium, titanium, vanadium, zinc, and hydroquinone. Orthopedic implants contain metal alloys, which may include nickel, cobalt. Hypersensitivity to implants allergy may arise from the metal alloy or bone cement. Metal hypersensitivity reactions (MHR) can manifest as a local or systemic contact dermatitis weeks to months following exposure. The role of MHR in contributing to prosthesis failure is conflicting. In patients with no history of metal allergy, pre-implant patch testing is not routinely recommended as a positive patch test does not consistently predict in vivo metal-induced complication. MHR may be managed conservatively with good outcomes. However, in patients with MHR and implant failure, or in a preoperative patient with a proven and clinically relevant hypersensitivity, replacement of the implant, or implant with a titanium or oxidized zirconium alloy should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89956612022-04-27 Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction Yang, Sun Choi, Ellie Ng, Yau Hong Case Rep Dermatol Single Case A 53-year-old lady underwent a left total knee arthroplasty. She developed a dermatitis over the left knee on postoperative day 5, which worsened over the next 2 weeks and spread to the trunk despite regular topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. Physical examination revealed an erythematous plaque over the left knee and urticated plaques over the neck. She was given a course of oral and topical corticosteroids with resolution. Subsequent patch testing showed a showing ++ reactions to gold and nickel, and + reactions to copper, palladium, rhodium, titanium, vanadium, zinc, and hydroquinone. Orthopedic implants contain metal alloys, which may include nickel, cobalt. Hypersensitivity to implants allergy may arise from the metal alloy or bone cement. Metal hypersensitivity reactions (MHR) can manifest as a local or systemic contact dermatitis weeks to months following exposure. The role of MHR in contributing to prosthesis failure is conflicting. In patients with no history of metal allergy, pre-implant patch testing is not routinely recommended as a positive patch test does not consistently predict in vivo metal-induced complication. MHR may be managed conservatively with good outcomes. However, in patients with MHR and implant failure, or in a preoperative patient with a proven and clinically relevant hypersensitivity, replacement of the implant, or implant with a titanium or oxidized zirconium alloy should be considered. S. Karger AG 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8995661/ /pubmed/35496506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523740 Text en Copyright © 2022 by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Single Case
Yang, Sun
Choi, Ellie
Ng, Yau Hong
Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title_full Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title_fullStr Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title_full_unstemmed Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title_short Cutaneous Metal Hypersensitivity Reaction
title_sort cutaneous metal hypersensitivity reaction
topic Single Case
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35496506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000523740
work_keys_str_mv AT yangsun cutaneousmetalhypersensitivityreaction
AT choiellie cutaneousmetalhypersensitivityreaction
AT ngyauhong cutaneousmetalhypersensitivityreaction