Cargando…

Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Pain during fixed orthodontic treatment can have a detrimental effect on patient treatment compliance. To overcome this, there is a definite need to establish the best pain-relieving methods suitable for orthodontic patients in terms of efficacy and use. The objective of this study was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basam, Lakshman Chowdary, Singaraju, Gowri Sankar, Obili, Sobitha, Keerthipati, Thejasree, Basam, Ram Chowdary, Prasad, Mandava
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449781
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.107
_version_ 1784684336735322112
author Basam, Lakshman Chowdary
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Obili, Sobitha
Keerthipati, Thejasree
Basam, Ram Chowdary
Prasad, Mandava
author_facet Basam, Lakshman Chowdary
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Obili, Sobitha
Keerthipati, Thejasree
Basam, Ram Chowdary
Prasad, Mandava
author_sort Basam, Lakshman Chowdary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain during fixed orthodontic treatment can have a detrimental effect on patient treatment compliance. To overcome this, there is a definite need to establish the best pain-relieving methods suitable for orthodontic patients in terms of efficacy and use. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of chewing gum and pre-emptive tenoxicam on pain after initial archwire placement and to evaluate the pain perceptions of orthodontic patients in the two groups while performing various functions at specific time intervals. METHODS: Forty-two patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: group A (chewing gum) and group B (pre-emptive tenoxicam). Pain perception was documented by patients immediately; at 4 h; at bedtime on the day of archwire placement; the next morning; at 24 h; and at bedtime on the 2nd, 3rd, and 7th day after the initial archwire placement. Pain scores were noted during fitting of the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing using a visual analog scale. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Group A showed a significant increase in pain until the next morning while fitting the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing [36.2, 52.0, 33.4, respectively]], followed by a gradual decrease by the 7th day. Group B showed a significant increase in pain at bedtime on biting, with a peak value of 47.5. Pain on chewing, fitting posterior teeth, peaked the morning of the next day (100.0, 45.0). The Freidman test showed a statistically significant difference with a p-value of < 0.01. Higher pain scores were observed while chewing and biting compared with that while fitting the posterior teeth in both groups. The overall comparison of pain control between the two groups was not statistically significant [P > 0.05] between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chewing gum was not inferior to pre-emptive tenoxicam. Thus, chewing gum is a non-pharmacological alternative to analgesics for orthodontic pain control that eliminates the chance of adverse reactions and can be used in the absence of adult observation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995674
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89956742022-04-20 Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial Basam, Lakshman Chowdary Singaraju, Gowri Sankar Obili, Sobitha Keerthipati, Thejasree Basam, Ram Chowdary Prasad, Mandava J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Pain during fixed orthodontic treatment can have a detrimental effect on patient treatment compliance. To overcome this, there is a definite need to establish the best pain-relieving methods suitable for orthodontic patients in terms of efficacy and use. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of chewing gum and pre-emptive tenoxicam on pain after initial archwire placement and to evaluate the pain perceptions of orthodontic patients in the two groups while performing various functions at specific time intervals. METHODS: Forty-two patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: group A (chewing gum) and group B (pre-emptive tenoxicam). Pain perception was documented by patients immediately; at 4 h; at bedtime on the day of archwire placement; the next morning; at 24 h; and at bedtime on the 2nd, 3rd, and 7th day after the initial archwire placement. Pain scores were noted during fitting of the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing using a visual analog scale. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: Group A showed a significant increase in pain until the next morning while fitting the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing [36.2, 52.0, 33.4, respectively]], followed by a gradual decrease by the 7th day. Group B showed a significant increase in pain at bedtime on biting, with a peak value of 47.5. Pain on chewing, fitting posterior teeth, peaked the morning of the next day (100.0, 45.0). The Freidman test showed a statistically significant difference with a p-value of < 0.01. Higher pain scores were observed while chewing and biting compared with that while fitting the posterior teeth in both groups. The overall comparison of pain control between the two groups was not statistically significant [P > 0.05] between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chewing gum was not inferior to pre-emptive tenoxicam. Thus, chewing gum is a non-pharmacological alternative to analgesics for orthodontic pain control that eliminates the chance of adverse reactions and can be used in the absence of adult observation. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2022-04 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8995674/ /pubmed/35449781 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.107 Text en Copyright © 2022 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Basam, Lakshman Chowdary
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Obili, Sobitha
Keerthipati, Thejasree
Basam, Ram Chowdary
Prasad, Mandava
Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort orthodontic pain control following arch wire placement; a comparison between pre-emptive tenoxicam and chewing gum: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995674/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35449781
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.107
work_keys_str_mv AT basamlakshmanchowdary orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT singarajugowrisankar orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT obilisobitha orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT keerthipatithejasree orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT basamramchowdary orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT prasadmandava orthodonticpaincontrolfollowingarchwireplacementacomparisonbetweenpreemptivetenoxicamandchewinggumarandomizedclinicaltrial