Cargando…
Legal countermeasures against COVID-19 in Japan: effectiveness and limits of non-coercive measures
This paper analyzes the Japanese legal responses to COVID-19. Japan did not declare the state of emergency on the constitutional level. In addition, it did not enact a new law and instead amended existing statutes several times to cope with the situation. The paper first introduces provisions of the...
Autor principal: | Kadomatsu, Narufumi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995689/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12689-022-00093-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
COVID 19: how coercive were the coercive measures taken to fight the pandemic
por: Marciano, Alain, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS)
por: Gutowski, Ellen R., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Revisiting Japan's early COVID‐19 countermeasures
por: Kaneda, Yudai, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Patients' experiences of coercive treatment and coercive measures in psychiatric care
por: Wallsten, Tuula, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Effects of voluntary event cancellation and school closure as countermeasures against COVID-19 outbreak in Japan
por: Sugishita, Yoshiyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)