Cargando…
Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110 |
_version_ | 1784684346482884608 |
---|---|
author | Bennett, Thomas M. Allan, John F. Garden, Jennifer A. Shaver, Michael P. |
author_facet | Bennett, Thomas M. Allan, John F. Garden, Jennifer A. Shaver, Michael P. |
author_sort | Bennett, Thomas M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in Europe and account for more than 50% of the total market by volume. MWI typically consists of two key components: a mesh of inorganic fibers that are several micrometers in diameter, and an organic thermosetting adhesive commonly referred to as the “binder.” Traditional phenol‐formaldehyde‐urea (PFU) binders used in the manufacture of MWI are increasingly being scrutinized for the formaldehyde released during their manufacture and service lifetime. The recent classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen by various safety organizations has accelerated a paradigm shift within the industry toward alternative binder technologies that minimize or indeed eliminate formaldehyde emissions. This review examines more recent strategies for achieving low‐ or zero‐added formaldehyde binders for MWI, with a particular focus on the patent literature. The chemistry underpinning traditional PFU binders is presented and compared to new strategies involving scavenging molecules that decrease formaldehyde emissions, as well as zero‐added formaldehyde binder technologies such as polyester, Maillard, and epoxide thermosets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8995714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89957142022-04-15 Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review Bennett, Thomas M. Allan, John F. Garden, Jennifer A. Shaver, Michael P. Glob Chall Reviews Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in Europe and account for more than 50% of the total market by volume. MWI typically consists of two key components: a mesh of inorganic fibers that are several micrometers in diameter, and an organic thermosetting adhesive commonly referred to as the “binder.” Traditional phenol‐formaldehyde‐urea (PFU) binders used in the manufacture of MWI are increasingly being scrutinized for the formaldehyde released during their manufacture and service lifetime. The recent classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen by various safety organizations has accelerated a paradigm shift within the industry toward alternative binder technologies that minimize or indeed eliminate formaldehyde emissions. This review examines more recent strategies for achieving low‐ or zero‐added formaldehyde binders for MWI, with a particular focus on the patent literature. The chemistry underpinning traditional PFU binders is presented and compared to new strategies involving scavenging molecules that decrease formaldehyde emissions, as well as zero‐added formaldehyde binder technologies such as polyester, Maillard, and epoxide thermosets. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8995714/ /pubmed/35433028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Bennett, Thomas M. Allan, John F. Garden, Jennifer A. Shaver, Michael P. Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title | Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title_full | Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title_fullStr | Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title_short | Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review |
title_sort | low formaldehyde binders for mineral wool insulation: a review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennettthomasm lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview AT allanjohnf lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview AT gardenjennifera lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview AT shavermichaelp lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview |