Cargando…

Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review

Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Thomas M., Allan, John F., Garden, Jennifer A., Shaver, Michael P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110
_version_ 1784684346482884608
author Bennett, Thomas M.
Allan, John F.
Garden, Jennifer A.
Shaver, Michael P.
author_facet Bennett, Thomas M.
Allan, John F.
Garden, Jennifer A.
Shaver, Michael P.
author_sort Bennett, Thomas M.
collection PubMed
description Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in Europe and account for more than 50% of the total market by volume. MWI typically consists of two key components: a mesh of inorganic fibers that are several micrometers in diameter, and an organic thermosetting adhesive commonly referred to as the “binder.” Traditional phenol‐formaldehyde‐urea (PFU) binders used in the manufacture of MWI are increasingly being scrutinized for the formaldehyde released during their manufacture and service lifetime. The recent classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen by various safety organizations has accelerated a paradigm shift within the industry toward alternative binder technologies that minimize or indeed eliminate formaldehyde emissions. This review examines more recent strategies for achieving low‐ or zero‐added formaldehyde binders for MWI, with a particular focus on the patent literature. The chemistry underpinning traditional PFU binders is presented and compared to new strategies involving scavenging molecules that decrease formaldehyde emissions, as well as zero‐added formaldehyde binder technologies such as polyester, Maillard, and epoxide thermosets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89957142022-04-15 Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review Bennett, Thomas M. Allan, John F. Garden, Jennifer A. Shaver, Michael P. Glob Chall Reviews Insulating materials are ubiquitous in a built environment and play a critical role in reducing the energy consumed to maintain habitable indoor environments. Mineral wool insulation (MWI) products, including glass, stone, and slag variants, are the most widely used class of insulating materials in Europe and account for more than 50% of the total market by volume. MWI typically consists of two key components: a mesh of inorganic fibers that are several micrometers in diameter, and an organic thermosetting adhesive commonly referred to as the “binder.” Traditional phenol‐formaldehyde‐urea (PFU) binders used in the manufacture of MWI are increasingly being scrutinized for the formaldehyde released during their manufacture and service lifetime. The recent classification of formaldehyde as a carcinogen by various safety organizations has accelerated a paradigm shift within the industry toward alternative binder technologies that minimize or indeed eliminate formaldehyde emissions. This review examines more recent strategies for achieving low‐ or zero‐added formaldehyde binders for MWI, with a particular focus on the patent literature. The chemistry underpinning traditional PFU binders is presented and compared to new strategies involving scavenging molecules that decrease formaldehyde emissions, as well as zero‐added formaldehyde binder technologies such as polyester, Maillard, and epoxide thermosets. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8995714/ /pubmed/35433028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Global Challenges published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Bennett, Thomas M.
Allan, John F.
Garden, Jennifer A.
Shaver, Michael P.
Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title_full Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title_fullStr Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title_short Low Formaldehyde Binders for Mineral Wool Insulation: A Review
title_sort low formaldehyde binders for mineral wool insulation: a review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35433028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202100110
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettthomasm lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview
AT allanjohnf lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview
AT gardenjennifera lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview
AT shavermichaelp lowformaldehydebindersformineralwoolinsulationareview