Cargando…

Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to understand, during an intervention which integrated family planning (FP) and immunisation, (1) if and how prevailing contextual factors influenced acceptability and use of modern contraceptive methods (MCMs) in a pastoral community in Uganda, (2) what mechanisms were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnaratne, Shari, Hoyt, Jenna, Hamon, Jessie K, Ariko, Angela Barbra, Atayo, Carol, Morukileng, Job, Spilotros, Nathaly, Webster, Jayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054277
_version_ 1784684396084723712
author Krishnaratne, Shari
Hoyt, Jenna
Hamon, Jessie K
Ariko, Angela Barbra
Atayo, Carol
Morukileng, Job
Spilotros, Nathaly
Webster, Jayne
author_facet Krishnaratne, Shari
Hoyt, Jenna
Hamon, Jessie K
Ariko, Angela Barbra
Atayo, Carol
Morukileng, Job
Spilotros, Nathaly
Webster, Jayne
author_sort Krishnaratne, Shari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study sought to understand, during an intervention which integrated family planning (FP) and immunisation, (1) if and how prevailing contextual factors influenced acceptability and use of modern contraceptive methods (MCMs) in a pastoral community in Uganda, (2) what mechanisms were triggered by these contextual factors (3) if these contextual factors changed between two time points 2 years apart and (4) the impact of contextual changes on mechanisms triggered and acceptability and use outcomes. DESIGN: Qualitative realist evaluation over two time points. SETTING: Government health facilities in Moroto District, Karamoja, Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: 69 participants involved in the delivery and uptake of integrated FP and childhood immunisation services. INTERVENTION: Integrated delivery of FP and childhood immunisation services offered to women accessing immunisation services in health facilities between January 2016 and December 2019. RESULTS: Four key themes were identified that encompassed context and mechanisms influencing acceptability of MCMs across both time points of the evaluation. These were: (1) fear of side effects of MCMs; (2) preference for natural FP methods; (3) pastoral lifestyles in the community and (4) food insecurity. The context of these themes changed over time leading to the triggering of mechanisms with an overall increase in acceptability of MCMs over time. Key mechanisms of acceptability triggered included: affective attitude, intervention coherence, self-efficacy, perceived effectiveness and opportunity cost, leading to the development of three context-acceptability theories. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, social and cultural norms played a strong role in influencing acceptability of the intervention. The context combined with intervention components were found to trigger several mechanisms that mapped to constructs of diffusion of innovations and acted as catalysts for mechanisms of acceptability. The context in which the intervention was implemented changed leading to the triggering of mechanisms and an increase in the perceived value and acceptability of MCM use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89959572022-04-27 Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points Krishnaratne, Shari Hoyt, Jenna Hamon, Jessie K Ariko, Angela Barbra Atayo, Carol Morukileng, Job Spilotros, Nathaly Webster, Jayne BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: This study sought to understand, during an intervention which integrated family planning (FP) and immunisation, (1) if and how prevailing contextual factors influenced acceptability and use of modern contraceptive methods (MCMs) in a pastoral community in Uganda, (2) what mechanisms were triggered by these contextual factors (3) if these contextual factors changed between two time points 2 years apart and (4) the impact of contextual changes on mechanisms triggered and acceptability and use outcomes. DESIGN: Qualitative realist evaluation over two time points. SETTING: Government health facilities in Moroto District, Karamoja, Uganda. PARTICIPANTS: 69 participants involved in the delivery and uptake of integrated FP and childhood immunisation services. INTERVENTION: Integrated delivery of FP and childhood immunisation services offered to women accessing immunisation services in health facilities between January 2016 and December 2019. RESULTS: Four key themes were identified that encompassed context and mechanisms influencing acceptability of MCMs across both time points of the evaluation. These were: (1) fear of side effects of MCMs; (2) preference for natural FP methods; (3) pastoral lifestyles in the community and (4) food insecurity. The context of these themes changed over time leading to the triggering of mechanisms with an overall increase in acceptability of MCMs over time. Key mechanisms of acceptability triggered included: affective attitude, intervention coherence, self-efficacy, perceived effectiveness and opportunity cost, leading to the development of three context-acceptability theories. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, social and cultural norms played a strong role in influencing acceptability of the intervention. The context combined with intervention components were found to trigger several mechanisms that mapped to constructs of diffusion of innovations and acted as catalysts for mechanisms of acceptability. The context in which the intervention was implemented changed leading to the triggering of mechanisms and an increase in the perceived value and acceptability of MCM use. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8995957/ /pubmed/35396286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054277 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Krishnaratne, Shari
Hoyt, Jenna
Hamon, Jessie K
Ariko, Angela Barbra
Atayo, Carol
Morukileng, Job
Spilotros, Nathaly
Webster, Jayne
Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title_full Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title_fullStr Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title_short Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
title_sort acceptability of family planning in a changing context in uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054277
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnaratneshari acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT hoytjenna acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT hamonjessiek acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT arikoangelabarbra acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT atayocarol acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT morukilengjob acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT spilotrosnathaly acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints
AT websterjayne acceptabilityoffamilyplanninginachangingcontextinugandaarealistevaluationattwotimepoints