Cargando…

Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel aerosol-exposure protection (AP) mask in preventing coronavirus disease in healthcare professionals during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and to evaluate its clinical feasibility. METHODS: In Study 1, three healthy volunteers voli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Makiguchi, Mai Ego, Abe, Seiichiro, Okagawa, Yutaka, Nonaka, Satoru, Suzuki, Haruhisa, Yoshinaga, Shigetaka, Oda, Ichiro, Ryuta, Okamoto, Saito, Yutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905818
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.178-IDEN
_version_ 1784684406273736704
author Makiguchi, Mai Ego
Abe, Seiichiro
Okagawa, Yutaka
Nonaka, Satoru
Suzuki, Haruhisa
Yoshinaga, Shigetaka
Oda, Ichiro
Ryuta, Okamoto
Saito, Yutaka
author_facet Makiguchi, Mai Ego
Abe, Seiichiro
Okagawa, Yutaka
Nonaka, Satoru
Suzuki, Haruhisa
Yoshinaga, Shigetaka
Oda, Ichiro
Ryuta, Okamoto
Saito, Yutaka
author_sort Makiguchi, Mai Ego
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel aerosol-exposure protection (AP) mask in preventing coronavirus disease in healthcare professionals during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and to evaluate its clinical feasibility. METHODS: In Study 1, three healthy volunteers volitionally coughed with and without the AP mask in a cleanroom. Microparticles were visualized and counted with a specific measurement system and compared with and without the AP mask. In Study 2, 30 patients underwent endoscopic resection with the AP mask covering the face, and the SpO2 was measured throughout the procedure. RESULTS: In Study 1, the median number of microparticles in volunteers 1, 2, and 3 with and without the AP mask was 8.5 and 110.0, 7.0 and 51.5, and 8.0 and 95.0, respectively (p<0.01). Using the AP mask, microparticles were reduced by approximately 92%. The median distances of microparticle scattering without the AP mask were 60, 0, and 68 in volunteers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In Study 2, the mean SpO2 was 96.3%, and desaturation occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: The AP mask could provide protection from aerosol exposure and can be safely used for endoscopy in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8995999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89959992022-04-21 Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Makiguchi, Mai Ego Abe, Seiichiro Okagawa, Yutaka Nonaka, Satoru Suzuki, Haruhisa Yoshinaga, Shigetaka Oda, Ichiro Ryuta, Okamoto Saito, Yutaka Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel aerosol-exposure protection (AP) mask in preventing coronavirus disease in healthcare professionals during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and to evaluate its clinical feasibility. METHODS: In Study 1, three healthy volunteers volitionally coughed with and without the AP mask in a cleanroom. Microparticles were visualized and counted with a specific measurement system and compared with and without the AP mask. In Study 2, 30 patients underwent endoscopic resection with the AP mask covering the face, and the SpO2 was measured throughout the procedure. RESULTS: In Study 1, the median number of microparticles in volunteers 1, 2, and 3 with and without the AP mask was 8.5 and 110.0, 7.0 and 51.5, and 8.0 and 95.0, respectively (p<0.01). Using the AP mask, microparticles were reduced by approximately 92%. The median distances of microparticle scattering without the AP mask were 60, 0, and 68 in volunteers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In Study 2, the mean SpO2 was 96.3%, and desaturation occurred in three patients. CONCLUSION: The AP mask could provide protection from aerosol exposure and can be safely used for endoscopy in clinical practice. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022-03 2021-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8995999/ /pubmed/34905818 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.178-IDEN Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Makiguchi, Mai Ego
Abe, Seiichiro
Okagawa, Yutaka
Nonaka, Satoru
Suzuki, Haruhisa
Yoshinaga, Shigetaka
Oda, Ichiro
Ryuta, Okamoto
Saito, Yutaka
Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title_full Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title_fullStr Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title_short Preclinical Efficacy and Clinical Feasibility of a Novel Aerosol-Exposure Protection Mask for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
title_sort preclinical efficacy and clinical feasibility of a novel aerosol-exposure protection mask for esophagogastroduodenoscopy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905818
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.178-IDEN
work_keys_str_mv AT makiguchimaiego preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT abeseiichiro preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT okagawayutaka preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT nonakasatoru preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT suzukiharuhisa preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT yoshinagashigetaka preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT odaichiro preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT ryutaokamoto preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy
AT saitoyutaka preclinicalefficacyandclinicalfeasibilityofanovelaerosolexposureprotectionmaskforesophagogastroduodenoscopy