Cargando…

Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study

INTRODUCTION: The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no prev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craig, Peter, Barr, Benjamin, Baxter, Andrew J, Brown, Heather, Cheetham, Mandy, Gibson, Marcia, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Moffatt, Suzanne, Morris, Steph, Munford, Luke Aaron, Richiardi, Matteo, Sutton, Matt, Taylor-Robinson, David, Wickham, Sophie, Xiang, Huasheng, Bambra, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340
_version_ 1784684410158710784
author Craig, Peter
Barr, Benjamin
Baxter, Andrew J
Brown, Heather
Cheetham, Mandy
Gibson, Marcia
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Moffatt, Suzanne
Morris, Steph
Munford, Luke Aaron
Richiardi, Matteo
Sutton, Matt
Taylor-Robinson, David
Wickham, Sophie
Xiang, Huasheng
Bambra, Clare
author_facet Craig, Peter
Barr, Benjamin
Baxter, Andrew J
Brown, Heather
Cheetham, Mandy
Gibson, Marcia
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Moffatt, Suzanne
Morris, Steph
Munford, Luke Aaron
Richiardi, Matteo
Sutton, Matt
Taylor-Robinson, David
Wickham, Sophie
Xiang, Huasheng
Bambra, Clare
author_sort Craig, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen’s Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost–consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost–benefit analyses of mitigating actions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the Research Registry: researchregistry6697.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8996017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89960172022-04-27 Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study Craig, Peter Barr, Benjamin Baxter, Andrew J Brown, Heather Cheetham, Mandy Gibson, Marcia Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Moffatt, Suzanne Morris, Steph Munford, Luke Aaron Richiardi, Matteo Sutton, Matt Taylor-Robinson, David Wickham, Sophie Xiang, Huasheng Bambra, Clare BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: The UK social security system is being transformed by the implementation of Universal Credit (UC), which combines six existing benefits and tax credits into a single payment for low-income households. Despite extensive reports of hardship associated with the introduction of UC, no previous studies have comprehensively evaluated its impact on mental health. Because payments are targeted at low-income households, impacts on mental health will have important consequences for health inequalities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a mixed methods study. Work package (WP) 1 will compare health outcomes for new recipients of UC with outcomes for legacy benefit recipients in two large population surveys, using the phased rollout of UC as a natural experiment. We will also analyse the relationship between the proportion of UC claimants in small areas and a composite measure of mental health. WP2 will use data collected by Citizen’s Advice to explore the sociodemographic and health characteristics of people who seek advice when claiming UC and identify features of the claim process that prompt advice-seeking. WP3 will conduct longitudinal in-depth interviews with up to 80 UC claimants in England and Scotland to explore reasons for claiming and experiences of the claim process. Up to 30 staff supporting claimants will also be interviewed. WP4 will use a dynamic microsimulation model to simulate the long-term health impacts of different implementation scenarios. WP5 will undertake cost–consequence analysis of the potential costs and outcomes of introducing UC and cost–benefit analyses of mitigating actions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained ethical approval for the primary data gathering from the University of Glasgow, College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee, application number 400200244. We will use our networks to actively disseminate findings to UC claimants, the public, practitioners and policy-makers, using a range of methods and formats. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the Research Registry: researchregistry6697. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8996017/ /pubmed/35396318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Craig, Peter
Barr, Benjamin
Baxter, Andrew J
Brown, Heather
Cheetham, Mandy
Gibson, Marcia
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Moffatt, Suzanne
Morris, Steph
Munford, Luke Aaron
Richiardi, Matteo
Sutton, Matt
Taylor-Robinson, David
Wickham, Sophie
Xiang, Huasheng
Bambra, Clare
Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_short Evaluation of the mental health impacts of Universal Credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
title_sort evaluation of the mental health impacts of universal credit: protocol for a mixed methods study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061340
work_keys_str_mv AT craigpeter evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT barrbenjamin evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT baxterandrewj evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT brownheather evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT cheethammandy evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT gibsonmarcia evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT katikireddisrinivasavittal evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT moffattsuzanne evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT morrissteph evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT munfordlukeaaron evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT richiardimatteo evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT suttonmatt evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT taylorrobinsondavid evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT wickhamsophie evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT xianghuasheng evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy
AT bambraclare evaluationofthementalhealthimpactsofuniversalcreditprotocolforamixedmethodsstudy