Cargando…
Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term effects and complications of medical treatment (MT) of obesity including very low energy diet with bariatric surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective study conducted in a clinical setting recruited individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m(2) referred for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053242 |
_version_ | 1784684412071313408 |
---|---|
author | Höskuldsdottir, Gudrun Engström, My Rawshani, Araz Lenér, Frida Wallenius, Ville Fändriks, Lars Mossberg, Karin Eliasson, Björn |
author_facet | Höskuldsdottir, Gudrun Engström, My Rawshani, Araz Lenér, Frida Wallenius, Ville Fändriks, Lars Mossberg, Karin Eliasson, Björn |
author_sort | Höskuldsdottir, Gudrun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term effects and complications of medical treatment (MT) of obesity including very low energy diet with bariatric surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective study conducted in a clinical setting recruited individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m(2) referred for obesity treatment. Demographic and anthropometric data, laboratory samples, and questionnaire replies were collected at baseline and 2 years. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: 971 individuals were recruited 2015–2017. 382 received MT, 388 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 201 sleeve gastrectomy (SG). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included changes in anthropometric measures, metabolic variables and safety. These were analysed using a linear regression model. A logistic regression model was used to analyse composite variables for treatment success (secondary outcomes). A random forest (RF) model was used to examine the importance of 15 clinical domains as predictors for successful treatment. RESULTS: Two-year data were available for 667 individuals (68.7%). Regarding primary outcomes, the decrease in excess BMI was 27.5%, 82.5% and 70.3% and proportion achieving a weight of >10% was 45.3%, 99.6% and 95.6% for MT, RYGB and SG, respectively (p<0.001). The groups were comparable regarding levels of vitamins, minerals and haemoglobin or safety measures. Likelihood for success (secondary outcome) was higher in the surgical groups (RYGB: OR 5.3 (95% CI 3.9 to 7.2) vs SG: OR 4.3 ((95% CI 3.0 to 6.2)) in reference to MT. Baseline anthropometry had the strongest predictive value for treatment success, according to the RF model. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, bariatric surgery by RYGB or SG is most effective, but meaningful weight loss is achievable by MT with strict caloric restriction and stepwise introduction of a normal diet. All treatments showed positive effects on well-being, cardiovascular risk factors, and levels of vitamins and minerals at 2-year follow-up and groups were similar regarding safety measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03152617. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8996036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89960362022-04-27 Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study Höskuldsdottir, Gudrun Engström, My Rawshani, Araz Lenér, Frida Wallenius, Ville Fändriks, Lars Mossberg, Karin Eliasson, Björn BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term effects and complications of medical treatment (MT) of obesity including very low energy diet with bariatric surgery. DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective study conducted in a clinical setting recruited individuals with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m(2) referred for obesity treatment. Demographic and anthropometric data, laboratory samples, and questionnaire replies were collected at baseline and 2 years. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: 971 individuals were recruited 2015–2017. 382 received MT, 388 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 201 sleeve gastrectomy (SG). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included changes in anthropometric measures, metabolic variables and safety. These were analysed using a linear regression model. A logistic regression model was used to analyse composite variables for treatment success (secondary outcomes). A random forest (RF) model was used to examine the importance of 15 clinical domains as predictors for successful treatment. RESULTS: Two-year data were available for 667 individuals (68.7%). Regarding primary outcomes, the decrease in excess BMI was 27.5%, 82.5% and 70.3% and proportion achieving a weight of >10% was 45.3%, 99.6% and 95.6% for MT, RYGB and SG, respectively (p<0.001). The groups were comparable regarding levels of vitamins, minerals and haemoglobin or safety measures. Likelihood for success (secondary outcome) was higher in the surgical groups (RYGB: OR 5.3 (95% CI 3.9 to 7.2) vs SG: OR 4.3 ((95% CI 3.0 to 6.2)) in reference to MT. Baseline anthropometry had the strongest predictive value for treatment success, according to the RF model. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, bariatric surgery by RYGB or SG is most effective, but meaningful weight loss is achievable by MT with strict caloric restriction and stepwise introduction of a normal diet. All treatments showed positive effects on well-being, cardiovascular risk factors, and levels of vitamins and minerals at 2-year follow-up and groups were similar regarding safety measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03152617. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8996036/ /pubmed/35396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053242 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Nutrition and Metabolism Höskuldsdottir, Gudrun Engström, My Rawshani, Araz Lenér, Frida Wallenius, Ville Fändriks, Lars Mossberg, Karin Eliasson, Björn Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title | Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | comparing effects of obesity treatment with very low energy diet and bariatric surgery after 2 years: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Nutrition and Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoskuldsdottirgudrun comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT engstrommy comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT rawshaniaraz comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT lenerfrida comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT walleniusville comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT fandrikslars comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT mossbergkarin comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy AT eliassonbjorn comparingeffectsofobesitytreatmentwithverylowenergydietandbariatricsurgeryafter2yearsaprospectivecohortstudy |