Cargando…
Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis
BACKGROUND: In settings where the COVID-19 vaccine supply is constrained, extending the intervals between the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine may allow more people receive their first doses earlier. Our aim is to estimate the health impact of COVID-19 vaccination alongside benefit-ris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100381 |
_version_ | 1784684419467968512 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yang Pearson, Carl A.B. Sandmann, Frank G. Barnard, Rosanna C. Kim, Jong-Hoon Flasche, Stefan Jit, Mark Abbas, Kaja |
author_facet | Liu, Yang Pearson, Carl A.B. Sandmann, Frank G. Barnard, Rosanna C. Kim, Jong-Hoon Flasche, Stefan Jit, Mark Abbas, Kaja |
author_sort | Liu, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In settings where the COVID-19 vaccine supply is constrained, extending the intervals between the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine may allow more people receive their first doses earlier. Our aim is to estimate the health impact of COVID-19 vaccination alongside benefit-risk assessment of different dosing intervals in 13 middle-income countries (MICs) of Europe. METHODS: We fitted a dynamic transmission model to country-level daily reported COVID-19 mortality in 13 MICs in Europe (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Georgia, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Serbia, North Macedonia, Turkey, and Ukraine). A vaccine product with characteristics similar to those of the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 (AZD1222) vaccine was used in the base case scenario and was complemented by sensitivity analyses around efficacies similar to other COVID-19 vaccines. Both fixed dosing intervals at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks and dose-specific intervals that prioritise specific doses for certain age groups were tested. Optimal intervals minimise COVID-19 mortality between March 2021 and December 2022. We incorporated the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) into the model and conducted a benefit-risk assessment to quantify the tradeoff between health benefits versus adverse events following immunisation. FINDINGS: In all countries modelled, optimal strategies are those that prioritise the first doses among older adults (60+ years) or adults (20+ years), which lead to dosing intervals longer than six months. In comparison, a four-week fixed dosing interval may incur 10.1% [range: 4.3% - 19.0%; n = 13 (countries)] more deaths. The rapid waning of the immunity induced by the first dose (i.e. with means ranging 60-120 days as opposed to 360 days in the base case) resulted in shorter optimal dosing intervals of 8-20 weeks. Benefit-risk ratios were the highest for fixed dosing intervals of 8-12 weeks. INTERPRETATION: We infer that longer dosing intervals of over six months could reduce COVID-19 mortality in MICs of Europe. Certain parameters, such as rapid waning of first-dose induced immunity and increased immune escape through the emergence of VOCs, could significantly shorten the optimal dosing intervals. FUNDING: World Health Organization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8996067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89960672022-04-11 Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis Liu, Yang Pearson, Carl A.B. Sandmann, Frank G. Barnard, Rosanna C. Kim, Jong-Hoon Flasche, Stefan Jit, Mark Abbas, Kaja Lancet Reg Health Eur Articles BACKGROUND: In settings where the COVID-19 vaccine supply is constrained, extending the intervals between the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine may allow more people receive their first doses earlier. Our aim is to estimate the health impact of COVID-19 vaccination alongside benefit-risk assessment of different dosing intervals in 13 middle-income countries (MICs) of Europe. METHODS: We fitted a dynamic transmission model to country-level daily reported COVID-19 mortality in 13 MICs in Europe (Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Georgia, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Serbia, North Macedonia, Turkey, and Ukraine). A vaccine product with characteristics similar to those of the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 (AZD1222) vaccine was used in the base case scenario and was complemented by sensitivity analyses around efficacies similar to other COVID-19 vaccines. Both fixed dosing intervals at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 weeks and dose-specific intervals that prioritise specific doses for certain age groups were tested. Optimal intervals minimise COVID-19 mortality between March 2021 and December 2022. We incorporated the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) into the model and conducted a benefit-risk assessment to quantify the tradeoff between health benefits versus adverse events following immunisation. FINDINGS: In all countries modelled, optimal strategies are those that prioritise the first doses among older adults (60+ years) or adults (20+ years), which lead to dosing intervals longer than six months. In comparison, a four-week fixed dosing interval may incur 10.1% [range: 4.3% - 19.0%; n = 13 (countries)] more deaths. The rapid waning of the immunity induced by the first dose (i.e. with means ranging 60-120 days as opposed to 360 days in the base case) resulted in shorter optimal dosing intervals of 8-20 weeks. Benefit-risk ratios were the highest for fixed dosing intervals of 8-12 weeks. INTERPRETATION: We infer that longer dosing intervals of over six months could reduce COVID-19 mortality in MICs of Europe. Certain parameters, such as rapid waning of first-dose induced immunity and increased immune escape through the emergence of VOCs, could significantly shorten the optimal dosing intervals. FUNDING: World Health Organization. Elsevier 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8996067/ /pubmed/35434685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100381 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Liu, Yang Pearson, Carl A.B. Sandmann, Frank G. Barnard, Rosanna C. Kim, Jong-Hoon Flasche, Stefan Jit, Mark Abbas, Kaja Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title | Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title_full | Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title_fullStr | Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title_short | Dosing interval strategies for two-dose COVID-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of Europe: Health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
title_sort | dosing interval strategies for two-dose covid-19 vaccination in 13 middle-income countries of europe: health impact modelling and benefit-risk analysis |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyang dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT pearsoncarlab dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT sandmannfrankg dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT barnardrosannac dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT kimjonghoon dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT flaschestefan dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT jitmark dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis AT abbaskaja dosingintervalstrategiesfortwodosecovid19vaccinationin13middleincomecountriesofeuropehealthimpactmodellingandbenefitriskanalysis |