Cargando…

Effect of Direct Bilirubin Level on Clinical Outcome and Prognoses in Severely/Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how changes in direct bilirubin (DBiL) levels in severely/critically ill the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients during their first week of hospital admission affect their subsequent prognoses and mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 337 severely/cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Wensen, Liu, Hanting, Yang, Gang, Wang, Wei, Liu, Qiongfang, Huang, Chaolin, Zou, Zhuoru, Liu, Yun, Zhuang, Guihua, Zhang, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35419371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.843505
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate how changes in direct bilirubin (DBiL) levels in severely/critically ill the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients during their first week of hospital admission affect their subsequent prognoses and mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 337 severely/critically ill COVID-19 patients with two consecutive blood tests at hospital admission and about 7 days after. Based on the trend of the two consecutive tests, we categorized patients into the normal direct bilirubin (DBiL) group (224), declined DBiL group (44) and elevated DBiL group (79). RESULTS: The elevated DBiL group had a significantly larger proportion of critically ill patients (χ(2)-test, p < 0.001), a higher risk of ICU admission, respiratory failure, and shock at hospital admission (χ(2)-test, all p < 0.001). During hospitalization, the elevated DBiL group had significantly higher risks of shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and respiratory failure (χ(2)-test, all p < 0.001). The same findings were observed for heart damage (χ(2)-test, p = 0.002) and acute renal injury (χ(2)-test, p = 0.009). Cox regression analysis showed the risk of mortality in the elevated DBiL group was 2.27 (95% CI: 1.50–3.43, p < 0.001) times higher than that in the normal DBiL group after adjusted age, initial symptom, and laboratory markers. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that the second test of DBiL was consistently a better indicator of the occurrence of complications (except shock) and mortality than the first test in severely/critically ill COVID-19 patients. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) combined with two consecutive DBiL levels for respiratory failure and death was the largest. CONCLUSION: Elevated DBiL levels are an independent indicator for complication and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Compared with the DBiL levels at admission, DBiL levels on days 7 days of hospitalization are more advantageous in predicting the prognoses of COVID-19 in severely/critically ill patients.