Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis

Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Rommel, Najmi, Husain I, Chahal, Reetinder K, Nikhil, Dehankar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464566
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088
_version_ 1784684488606875648
author Singh, Rommel
Najmi, Husain I
Chahal, Reetinder K
Nikhil, Dehankar
author_facet Singh, Rommel
Najmi, Husain I
Chahal, Reetinder K
Nikhil, Dehankar
author_sort Singh, Rommel
collection PubMed
description Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis compared to a double-layered anastomosis. Methods: Patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis with either of these two techniques were observed prospectively for various outcome parameters like time taken for anastomosis, and that for entire surgery, postoperative complications, etc. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance by applying the chi-square test and student's “t-test.” Results: Duration for fashioning the anastomosis was significantly lesser for a single layer anastomosis than double (mean [±SD] for single layer was 19.57 ± 2.25 minutes and for double layer group was 30 ± 2.59 minutes, p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. The postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction was reported in three cases of the double layer group. Conclusion: Single-layered gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) resulted in a significant reduction in time, without any difference in complications. Additionally, it is easier to train surgical residents in the single-layered technique which is particularly important in the setting of a teaching institute and can be recommended for intestinal anastomosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8996431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89964312022-04-23 A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis Singh, Rommel Najmi, Husain I Chahal, Reetinder K Nikhil, Dehankar Cureus General Surgery Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis compared to a double-layered anastomosis. Methods: Patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis with either of these two techniques were observed prospectively for various outcome parameters like time taken for anastomosis, and that for entire surgery, postoperative complications, etc. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance by applying the chi-square test and student's “t-test.” Results: Duration for fashioning the anastomosis was significantly lesser for a single layer anastomosis than double (mean [±SD] for single layer was 19.57 ± 2.25 minutes and for double layer group was 30 ± 2.59 minutes, p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. The postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction was reported in three cases of the double layer group. Conclusion: Single-layered gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) resulted in a significant reduction in time, without any difference in complications. Additionally, it is easier to train surgical residents in the single-layered technique which is particularly important in the setting of a teaching institute and can be recommended for intestinal anastomosis. Cureus 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8996431/ /pubmed/35464566 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088 Text en Copyright © 2022, Singh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Singh, Rommel
Najmi, Husain I
Chahal, Reetinder K
Nikhil, Dehankar
A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title_full A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title_short A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
title_sort comparative study of single-layered versus double-layered intestinal anastomosis
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464566
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088
work_keys_str_mv AT singhrommel acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT najmihusaini acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT chahalreetinderk acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT nikhildehankar acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT singhrommel comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT najmihusaini comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT chahalreetinderk comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis
AT nikhildehankar comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis