Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis
Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis comp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464566 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088 |
_version_ | 1784684488606875648 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Rommel Najmi, Husain I Chahal, Reetinder K Nikhil, Dehankar |
author_facet | Singh, Rommel Najmi, Husain I Chahal, Reetinder K Nikhil, Dehankar |
author_sort | Singh, Rommel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis compared to a double-layered anastomosis. Methods: Patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis with either of these two techniques were observed prospectively for various outcome parameters like time taken for anastomosis, and that for entire surgery, postoperative complications, etc. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance by applying the chi-square test and student's “t-test.” Results: Duration for fashioning the anastomosis was significantly lesser for a single layer anastomosis than double (mean [±SD] for single layer was 19.57 ± 2.25 minutes and for double layer group was 30 ± 2.59 minutes, p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. The postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction was reported in three cases of the double layer group. Conclusion: Single-layered gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) resulted in a significant reduction in time, without any difference in complications. Additionally, it is easier to train surgical residents in the single-layered technique which is particularly important in the setting of a teaching institute and can be recommended for intestinal anastomosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8996431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89964312022-04-23 A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis Singh, Rommel Najmi, Husain I Chahal, Reetinder K Nikhil, Dehankar Cureus General Surgery Background: Intestinal perforations requiring resection anastomosis of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) or the formation and closure of temporary intestinal stoma are prevalent worldwide. This prospective comparative study was done to assess the efficacy and safety of single-layered anastomosis compared to a double-layered anastomosis. Methods: Patients undergoing intestinal anastomosis with either of these two techniques were observed prospectively for various outcome parameters like time taken for anastomosis, and that for entire surgery, postoperative complications, etc. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance by applying the chi-square test and student's “t-test.” Results: Duration for fashioning the anastomosis was significantly lesser for a single layer anastomosis than double (mean [±SD] for single layer was 19.57 ± 2.25 minutes and for double layer group was 30 ± 2.59 minutes, p=0.002). There was no statistical difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. The postoperative incomplete intestinal obstruction was reported in three cases of the double layer group. Conclusion: Single-layered gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) resulted in a significant reduction in time, without any difference in complications. Additionally, it is easier to train surgical residents in the single-layered technique which is particularly important in the setting of a teaching institute and can be recommended for intestinal anastomosis. Cureus 2022-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8996431/ /pubmed/35464566 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088 Text en Copyright © 2022, Singh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | General Surgery Singh, Rommel Najmi, Husain I Chahal, Reetinder K Nikhil, Dehankar A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title | A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Single-Layered Versus Double-Layered Intestinal Anastomosis |
title_sort | comparative study of single-layered versus double-layered intestinal anastomosis |
topic | General Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35464566 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhrommel acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT najmihusaini acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT chahalreetinderk acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT nikhildehankar acomparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT singhrommel comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT najmihusaini comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT chahalreetinderk comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis AT nikhildehankar comparativestudyofsinglelayeredversusdoublelayeredintestinalanastomosis |