Cargando…
Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9 |
_version_ | 1784684510506385408 |
---|---|
author | Metzner, Gloria Horstmann, Sabine Barth, Michael Giesler, Jürgen M. Jünemann, Susanne Kaier, Klaus Schlett, Christian Schroeder, Nora Siebolds, Marcus Sinss, Frank van Staa, Juliane Glattacker, Manuela Renner, Ilona |
author_facet | Metzner, Gloria Horstmann, Sabine Barth, Michael Giesler, Jürgen M. Jünemann, Susanne Kaier, Klaus Schlett, Christian Schroeder, Nora Siebolds, Marcus Sinss, Frank van Staa, Juliane Glattacker, Manuela Renner, Ilona |
author_sort | Metzner, Gloria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent’s resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians’ skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. METHODS: Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families’ use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8996544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89965442022-04-12 Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial Metzner, Gloria Horstmann, Sabine Barth, Michael Giesler, Jürgen M. Jünemann, Susanne Kaier, Klaus Schlett, Christian Schroeder, Nora Siebolds, Marcus Sinss, Frank van Staa, Juliane Glattacker, Manuela Renner, Ilona BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent’s resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians’ skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. METHODS: Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families’ use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8996544/ /pubmed/35410201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Metzner, Gloria Horstmann, Sabine Barth, Michael Giesler, Jürgen M. Jünemann, Susanne Kaier, Klaus Schlett, Christian Schroeder, Nora Siebolds, Marcus Sinss, Frank van Staa, Juliane Glattacker, Manuela Renner, Ilona Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metznergloria evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT horstmannsabine evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT barthmichael evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT gieslerjurgenm evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT junemannsusanne evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT kaierklaus evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT schlettchristian evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT schroedernora evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT sieboldsmarcus evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT sinssfrank evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT vanstaajuliane evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT glattackermanuela evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial AT rennerilona evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial |