Cargando…

Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metzner, Gloria, Horstmann, Sabine, Barth, Michael, Giesler, Jürgen M., Jünemann, Susanne, Kaier, Klaus, Schlett, Christian, Schroeder, Nora, Siebolds, Marcus, Sinss, Frank, van Staa, Juliane, Glattacker, Manuela, Renner, Ilona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9
_version_ 1784684510506385408
author Metzner, Gloria
Horstmann, Sabine
Barth, Michael
Giesler, Jürgen M.
Jünemann, Susanne
Kaier, Klaus
Schlett, Christian
Schroeder, Nora
Siebolds, Marcus
Sinss, Frank
van Staa, Juliane
Glattacker, Manuela
Renner, Ilona
author_facet Metzner, Gloria
Horstmann, Sabine
Barth, Michael
Giesler, Jürgen M.
Jünemann, Susanne
Kaier, Klaus
Schlett, Christian
Schroeder, Nora
Siebolds, Marcus
Sinss, Frank
van Staa, Juliane
Glattacker, Manuela
Renner, Ilona
author_sort Metzner, Gloria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent’s resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians’ skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. METHODS: Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families’ use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8996544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89965442022-04-12 Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial Metzner, Gloria Horstmann, Sabine Barth, Michael Giesler, Jürgen M. Jünemann, Susanne Kaier, Klaus Schlett, Christian Schroeder, Nora Siebolds, Marcus Sinss, Frank van Staa, Juliane Glattacker, Manuela Renner, Ilona BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children’s health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent’s resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians’ skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. METHODS: Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families’ use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8996544/ /pubmed/35410201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Metzner, Gloria
Horstmann, Sabine
Barth, Michael
Giesler, Jürgen M.
Jünemann, Susanne
Kaier, Klaus
Schlett, Christian
Schroeder, Nora
Siebolds, Marcus
Sinss, Frank
van Staa, Juliane
Glattacker, Manuela
Renner, Ilona
Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07787-9
work_keys_str_mv AT metznergloria evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT horstmannsabine evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT barthmichael evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT gieslerjurgenm evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT junemannsusanne evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT kaierklaus evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT schlettchristian evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT schroedernora evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT sieboldsmarcus evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT sinssfrank evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT vanstaajuliane evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT glattackermanuela evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial
AT rennerilona evaluationofacrosssectoralcareinterventionforfamilieswithpsychosocialburdenastudyprotocolofacontrolledtrial