Cargando…

Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy has undergone significant changes in recent years. Currently, close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of recurrence is the standard of care based on sev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Terlizzi, Mario, Limkin, Elaine Johanna, Moukasse, Yasmina, Blanchard, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35406460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071688
_version_ 1784684580523999232
author Terlizzi, Mario
Limkin, Elaine Johanna
Moukasse, Yasmina
Blanchard, Pierre
author_facet Terlizzi, Mario
Limkin, Elaine Johanna
Moukasse, Yasmina
Blanchard, Pierre
author_sort Terlizzi, Mario
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy has undergone significant changes in recent years. Currently, close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of recurrence is the standard of care based on several randomized trials and a meta-analysis that has demonstrated its non-inferiority to adjuvant RT. Uncertainties remain regarding the management of patients at very high risk of recurrence, including appropriate selection criteria for adjuvant hormone therapy, and the role of imaging in refining the treatment strategy. This review explains this paradigm shift, raises points of controversy, and suggests ways to think about the future. ABSTRACT: Nearly one-third of the patients who undergo prostatectomy for prostate cancer have a biochemical recurrence (BCR) during follow-up. While several randomized trials have shown that adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) improves biochemical control, this strategy has not been widely used because of the risk of toxicity and the fear of overtreating patients who would not have relapsed. In addition, the possibility of close PSA monitoring in the era of ultrasensitive assays enables to anticipate early salvage strategies (sRT). Three recent randomized trials and their meta-analysis have confirmed that aRT does not improve event-free survival compared to sRT, imposing the latter as the new standard of treatment. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to RT has been shown to improve biochemical control and metastasis-free survival, but the precise definition of to whom it should be proposed is still a matter of debate. The development of genomic tests or the use of artificial intelligence will allow more individualized treatment in the future. Therapeutic intensification with the combination of new-generation hormone therapy and RT is under study. Finally, the growing importance of metabolic imaging (PET/CT) due to its performance especially for low PSA levels will help in further personalizing management strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8996903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89969032022-04-12 Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives Terlizzi, Mario Limkin, Elaine Johanna Moukasse, Yasmina Blanchard, Pierre Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The management of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy has undergone significant changes in recent years. Currently, close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of recurrence is the standard of care based on several randomized trials and a meta-analysis that has demonstrated its non-inferiority to adjuvant RT. Uncertainties remain regarding the management of patients at very high risk of recurrence, including appropriate selection criteria for adjuvant hormone therapy, and the role of imaging in refining the treatment strategy. This review explains this paradigm shift, raises points of controversy, and suggests ways to think about the future. ABSTRACT: Nearly one-third of the patients who undergo prostatectomy for prostate cancer have a biochemical recurrence (BCR) during follow-up. While several randomized trials have shown that adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) improves biochemical control, this strategy has not been widely used because of the risk of toxicity and the fear of overtreating patients who would not have relapsed. In addition, the possibility of close PSA monitoring in the era of ultrasensitive assays enables to anticipate early salvage strategies (sRT). Three recent randomized trials and their meta-analysis have confirmed that aRT does not improve event-free survival compared to sRT, imposing the latter as the new standard of treatment. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to RT has been shown to improve biochemical control and metastasis-free survival, but the precise definition of to whom it should be proposed is still a matter of debate. The development of genomic tests or the use of artificial intelligence will allow more individualized treatment in the future. Therapeutic intensification with the combination of new-generation hormone therapy and RT is under study. Finally, the growing importance of metabolic imaging (PET/CT) due to its performance especially for low PSA levels will help in further personalizing management strategies. MDPI 2022-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8996903/ /pubmed/35406460 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071688 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Terlizzi, Mario
Limkin, Elaine Johanna
Moukasse, Yasmina
Blanchard, Pierre
Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title_full Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title_fullStr Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title_short Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives
title_sort adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: current status, controversies and perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35406460
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071688
work_keys_str_mv AT terlizzimario adjuvantorsalvageradiationtherapyforprostatecancerafterprostatectomycurrentstatuscontroversiesandperspectives
AT limkinelainejohanna adjuvantorsalvageradiationtherapyforprostatecancerafterprostatectomycurrentstatuscontroversiesandperspectives
AT moukasseyasmina adjuvantorsalvageradiationtherapyforprostatecancerafterprostatectomycurrentstatuscontroversiesandperspectives
AT blanchardpierre adjuvantorsalvageradiationtherapyforprostatecancerafterprostatectomycurrentstatuscontroversiesandperspectives