Cargando…

The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of male animals’ fertilizing capacity is based on laboratory-performed tests, as well as on the in vivo and in vitro reproductive outcome. Boar fertility is strongly associated with a pig farm’s financial status and income. The scientific community attempts to increase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stravogianni, Vasiliki, Samaras, Theodoros, Boscos, Constantin M., Markakis, John, Krystallidou, Evdokia, Basioura, Athina, Tsakmakidis, Ioannis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35405819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12070829
_version_ 1784684581792776192
author Stravogianni, Vasiliki
Samaras, Theodoros
Boscos, Constantin M.
Markakis, John
Krystallidou, Evdokia
Basioura, Athina
Tsakmakidis, Ioannis A.
author_facet Stravogianni, Vasiliki
Samaras, Theodoros
Boscos, Constantin M.
Markakis, John
Krystallidou, Evdokia
Basioura, Athina
Tsakmakidis, Ioannis A.
author_sort Stravogianni, Vasiliki
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of male animals’ fertilizing capacity is based on laboratory-performed tests, as well as on the in vivo and in vitro reproductive outcome. Boar fertility is strongly associated with a pig farm’s financial status and income. The scientific community attempts to increase the predictive reliability of male fertility to ensure the profitability of the pig industry. In this direction, a different approach, using biomedical thermal and motion sensors, is utilized. This study investigates the correlation of collected data by biomedical sensors with variables well known as their predictable value semen quality. Strong correlations are revealed, encouraging the further application of biomedical methods in the assessment of boars’ fertilizing ability. ABSTRACT: Biomedical measurements by specialized technological equipment have been used in farm animals to collect information about nutrition, behavior and welfare. This study investigates the relation of semen quality (CASA analysis, viability, morphology, membrane biochemical activity and DNA fragmentation) with boar behavior during ejaculation. Sensors were placed on the boar’s body. Movement features were collected using an inertial measurement unit (IMU), comprising an accelerometer, a gyroscope and a magnetometer. Boar, scrotal and dummy temperatures were measured by an infrared (IR) camera and an IR thermometer, while the face salivation of the boar was recorded by a moisture meter (also based on IR technology). All signals and images were logged on a mobile device (smartphone or tablet) using a Bluetooth connection and then transferred wirelessly to the cloud. The data files were then processed using scripts in MATLAB 2021a (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) to derive the necessary indices. Ninety-four ejaculates from five boars were analyzed in this study. The statistical analysis was performed in the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox of MATLAB 2021a using a linear mixed effects model. Significant and strong negative correlations (R(2) > 0.5, p ≤ 0.05) were observed between boar, dummy and scrotal temperature with the progressive, rapid and slow movement of spermatozoa, VCL (curvilinear velocity), VSL (straight line velocity) and ALH (amplitude of lateral head displacement) kinematics. The volume of the ejaculate was correlated with the scrotal and dummy temperature. Dummy’s temperature was negatively correlated with BCF (beat/cross-frequency), viability and total time of ejaculation, while it was positively correlated with abnormal morphology. Body temperature was negatively correlated with BCF. Positive correlations were noticed between VAP (average path velocity) and total time of ejaculation with body acceleration features, as well as between the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) and total time of ejaculation. In conclusion, the use of biomedical sensors can support the evaluation of boar sperm production capacity, providing valuable information about semen quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8996908
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89969082022-04-12 The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity Stravogianni, Vasiliki Samaras, Theodoros Boscos, Constantin M. Markakis, John Krystallidou, Evdokia Basioura, Athina Tsakmakidis, Ioannis A. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of male animals’ fertilizing capacity is based on laboratory-performed tests, as well as on the in vivo and in vitro reproductive outcome. Boar fertility is strongly associated with a pig farm’s financial status and income. The scientific community attempts to increase the predictive reliability of male fertility to ensure the profitability of the pig industry. In this direction, a different approach, using biomedical thermal and motion sensors, is utilized. This study investigates the correlation of collected data by biomedical sensors with variables well known as their predictable value semen quality. Strong correlations are revealed, encouraging the further application of biomedical methods in the assessment of boars’ fertilizing ability. ABSTRACT: Biomedical measurements by specialized technological equipment have been used in farm animals to collect information about nutrition, behavior and welfare. This study investigates the relation of semen quality (CASA analysis, viability, morphology, membrane biochemical activity and DNA fragmentation) with boar behavior during ejaculation. Sensors were placed on the boar’s body. Movement features were collected using an inertial measurement unit (IMU), comprising an accelerometer, a gyroscope and a magnetometer. Boar, scrotal and dummy temperatures were measured by an infrared (IR) camera and an IR thermometer, while the face salivation of the boar was recorded by a moisture meter (also based on IR technology). All signals and images were logged on a mobile device (smartphone or tablet) using a Bluetooth connection and then transferred wirelessly to the cloud. The data files were then processed using scripts in MATLAB 2021a (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) to derive the necessary indices. Ninety-four ejaculates from five boars were analyzed in this study. The statistical analysis was performed in the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox of MATLAB 2021a using a linear mixed effects model. Significant and strong negative correlations (R(2) > 0.5, p ≤ 0.05) were observed between boar, dummy and scrotal temperature with the progressive, rapid and slow movement of spermatozoa, VCL (curvilinear velocity), VSL (straight line velocity) and ALH (amplitude of lateral head displacement) kinematics. The volume of the ejaculate was correlated with the scrotal and dummy temperature. Dummy’s temperature was negatively correlated with BCF (beat/cross-frequency), viability and total time of ejaculation, while it was positively correlated with abnormal morphology. Body temperature was negatively correlated with BCF. Positive correlations were noticed between VAP (average path velocity) and total time of ejaculation with body acceleration features, as well as between the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) and total time of ejaculation. In conclusion, the use of biomedical sensors can support the evaluation of boar sperm production capacity, providing valuable information about semen quality. MDPI 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8996908/ /pubmed/35405819 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12070829 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stravogianni, Vasiliki
Samaras, Theodoros
Boscos, Constantin M.
Markakis, John
Krystallidou, Evdokia
Basioura, Athina
Tsakmakidis, Ioannis A.
The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title_full The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title_fullStr The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title_short The Use of Animal’s Body, Scrotal Temperature and Motion Monitoring in Evaluating Boar Semen Production Capacity
title_sort use of animal’s body, scrotal temperature and motion monitoring in evaluating boar semen production capacity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8996908/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35405819
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12070829
work_keys_str_mv AT stravogiannivasiliki theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT samarastheodoros theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT boscosconstantinm theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT markakisjohn theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT krystallidouevdokia theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT basiouraathina theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT tsakmakidisioannisa theuseofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT stravogiannivasiliki useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT samarastheodoros useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT boscosconstantinm useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT markakisjohn useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT krystallidouevdokia useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT basiouraathina useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity
AT tsakmakidisioannisa useofanimalsbodyscrotaltemperatureandmotionmonitoringinevaluatingboarsemenproductioncapacity