Cargando…
A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling
BACKGROUND: Gamblers engage in a range of “soft” financial options to limit access to money or cash for gambling (e.g., family looks after cash). Such barriers are easily overturned, resulting in a demand for financial systems and tools that offer “hard” restrictions on access to money and cash in a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Akadémiai Kiadó
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34546970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00065 |
_version_ | 1784684655000158208 |
---|---|
author | Rodda, Simone N |
author_facet | Rodda, Simone N |
author_sort | Rodda, Simone N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gamblers engage in a range of “soft” financial options to limit access to money or cash for gambling (e.g., family looks after cash). Such barriers are easily overturned, resulting in a demand for financial systems and tools that offer “hard” restrictions on access to money and cash in a gambling context. The aim of this scoping review was to determine the attitudes and preferences of gamblers and their families on systems or tools to restrict access to money and cash, as well as the effectiveness of systems and tools that can be used to accomplish that goal. METHODS: A systematic search of articles related to financial restrictions and gambling was conducted. Eligibility criteria included samples of gamblers or affected others and interventions targeted at money or cash restrictions in a gambling context. Soft financial barriers such as family involvement were excluded, as were limit-setting systems which focused on gambling expenditure in gambling venues. RESULTS: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria, with three focused on financial systems (e.g., ban on credit betting) and six focused on removal of cash machines from gambling venues. The included literature was generally of low quality, with just two pre-post studies and seven cross-sectional or qualitative ones. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provided strong support for financial mechanisms to support gamblers and their families. Future studies need to involve multiple stakeholders to provide this type of support as well as to evaluate the holistic impact that such hard barriers can have on gambling and gambling-related harms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8997216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89972162022-04-22 A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling Rodda, Simone N J Behav Addict Article BACKGROUND: Gamblers engage in a range of “soft” financial options to limit access to money or cash for gambling (e.g., family looks after cash). Such barriers are easily overturned, resulting in a demand for financial systems and tools that offer “hard” restrictions on access to money and cash in a gambling context. The aim of this scoping review was to determine the attitudes and preferences of gamblers and their families on systems or tools to restrict access to money and cash, as well as the effectiveness of systems and tools that can be used to accomplish that goal. METHODS: A systematic search of articles related to financial restrictions and gambling was conducted. Eligibility criteria included samples of gamblers or affected others and interventions targeted at money or cash restrictions in a gambling context. Soft financial barriers such as family involvement were excluded, as were limit-setting systems which focused on gambling expenditure in gambling venues. RESULTS: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria, with three focused on financial systems (e.g., ban on credit betting) and six focused on removal of cash machines from gambling venues. The included literature was generally of low quality, with just two pre-post studies and seven cross-sectional or qualitative ones. CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provided strong support for financial mechanisms to support gamblers and their families. Future studies need to involve multiple stakeholders to provide this type of support as well as to evaluate the holistic impact that such hard barriers can have on gambling and gambling-related harms. Akadémiai Kiadó 2021-09-17 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8997216/ /pubmed/34546970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00065 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated. |
spellingShingle | Article Rodda, Simone N A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title | A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title_full | A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title_short | A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
title_sort | scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34546970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roddasimonen ascopingreviewofhardsystemsandtoolsthatrestrictmoneyandcashforgambling AT roddasimonen scopingreviewofhardsystemsandtoolsthatrestrictmoneyandcashforgambling |