Cargando…

Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding

INTRODUCTION: Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a frequently advised investigation for upper abdominal symptoms. Studies have questioned the appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and have shown that inappropriate indications range from 5% to 49%. The unnecessary upper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohara, Tanka Prasad, Laudari, Uttam, Thapa, Abhishek, Rupakheti, Shail, Joshi, Mukund Raj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058633
_version_ 1784684676540006400
author Bohara, Tanka Prasad
Laudari, Uttam
Thapa, Abhishek
Rupakheti, Shail
Joshi, Mukund Raj
author_facet Bohara, Tanka Prasad
Laudari, Uttam
Thapa, Abhishek
Rupakheti, Shail
Joshi, Mukund Raj
author_sort Bohara, Tanka Prasad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a frequently advised investigation for upper abdominal symptoms. Studies have questioned the appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and have shown that inappropriate indications range from 5% to 49%. The unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy expose patients to the risk. The number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is rising in our region and we assume so is the number of unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. With an aim to find out the appropriateness of the indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and compare its association with positive findings, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: All patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during study period were included in the study. Appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was defined as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria as “appropriate” and “inappropriate”. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were classified as “significant” and “insignificant” based on endoscopy findings. The extent of this association between appropriateness of indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings was expressed as the odds ratio of finding a relevant diagnosis in patients with an “appropriate” indication compared with those with an ‘inappropriate'’ indication. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Fifty- two (65.8%) of the indications were considered appropriate as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Thirty-three (63.5%) of the appropriate indications has clinically significant finding as compared to seven (25.9%) of inappropriate indication with an odds ratio of 4.962 (95% CI:1.773 – 13.890, P=0.002) which is statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate indications have significantly higher rates of clinically significant findings. Use of guidelines may decrease the number of unnecessary procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8997324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Journal of the Nepal Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89973242022-05-06 Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding Bohara, Tanka Prasad Laudari, Uttam Thapa, Abhishek Rupakheti, Shail Joshi, Mukund Raj JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc Original Article INTRODUCTION: Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a frequently advised investigation for upper abdominal symptoms. Studies have questioned the appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and have shown that inappropriate indications range from 5% to 49%. The unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy expose patients to the risk. The number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is rising in our region and we assume so is the number of unnecessary upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. With an aim to find out the appropriateness of the indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and compare its association with positive findings, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. METHODS: All patients undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy during study period were included in the study. Appropriateness of indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was defined as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria as “appropriate” and “inappropriate”. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings were classified as “significant” and “insignificant” based on endoscopy findings. The extent of this association between appropriateness of indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings was expressed as the odds ratio of finding a relevant diagnosis in patients with an “appropriate” indication compared with those with an ‘inappropriate'’ indication. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Fifty- two (65.8%) of the indications were considered appropriate as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. Thirty-three (63.5%) of the appropriate indications has clinically significant finding as compared to seven (25.9%) of inappropriate indication with an odds ratio of 4.962 (95% CI:1.773 – 13.890, P=0.002) which is statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate indications have significantly higher rates of clinically significant findings. Use of guidelines may decrease the number of unnecessary procedures. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association 2018 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8997324/ /pubmed/30058633 Text en Journal of the Nepal Medical Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bohara, Tanka Prasad
Laudari, Uttam
Thapa, Abhishek
Rupakheti, Shail
Joshi, Mukund Raj
Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title_full Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title_fullStr Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title_full_unstemmed Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title_short Appropriateness of Indications of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and its Association With Positive Finding
title_sort appropriateness of indications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and its association with positive finding
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058633
work_keys_str_mv AT boharatankaprasad appropriatenessofindicationsofuppergastrointestinalendoscopyanditsassociationwithpositivefinding
AT laudariuttam appropriatenessofindicationsofuppergastrointestinalendoscopyanditsassociationwithpositivefinding
AT thapaabhishek appropriatenessofindicationsofuppergastrointestinalendoscopyanditsassociationwithpositivefinding
AT rupakhetishail appropriatenessofindicationsofuppergastrointestinalendoscopyanditsassociationwithpositivefinding
AT joshimukundraj appropriatenessofindicationsofuppergastrointestinalendoscopyanditsassociationwithpositivefinding