Cargando…

Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Yi-Bang, Thijs, Lutgarde, Aparicio, Lucas S., Huang, Qi-Fang, Wei, Fang-Fei, Yu, Yu-Ling, Barochiner, Jessica, Sheng, Chang-Sheng, Yang, Wen-Yi, Niiranen, Teemu J., Boggia, José, Zhang, Zhen-Yu, Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna, Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza, Tikhonoff, Valérie, Wojciechowska, Wiktoria, Casiglia, Edoardo, Narkiewicz, Krzysztof, Filipovský, Jan, Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina, Wang, Ji-Guang, Li, Yan, Staessen, Jan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35240865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18773
_version_ 1784684762577764352
author Cheng, Yi-Bang
Thijs, Lutgarde
Aparicio, Lucas S.
Huang, Qi-Fang
Wei, Fang-Fei
Yu, Yu-Ling
Barochiner, Jessica
Sheng, Chang-Sheng
Yang, Wen-Yi
Niiranen, Teemu J.
Boggia, José
Zhang, Zhen-Yu
Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Tikhonoff, Valérie
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Casiglia, Edoardo
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
Filipovský, Jan
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
Wang, Ji-Guang
Li, Yan
Staessen, Jan A.
author_facet Cheng, Yi-Bang
Thijs, Lutgarde
Aparicio, Lucas S.
Huang, Qi-Fang
Wei, Fang-Fei
Yu, Yu-Ling
Barochiner, Jessica
Sheng, Chang-Sheng
Yang, Wen-Yi
Niiranen, Teemu J.
Boggia, José
Zhang, Zhen-Yu
Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Tikhonoff, Valérie
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Casiglia, Edoardo
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
Filipovský, Jan
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
Wang, Ji-Guang
Li, Yan
Staessen, Jan A.
author_sort Cheng, Yi-Bang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1–111.8), 120.2 (119.4–121.0), 130.0 (129.6–130.3), and 149.5 (148.4–150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58–2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21–4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41–2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37–10.06) and 2.60 (1.35–5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8997688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89976882022-04-13 Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure Cheng, Yi-Bang Thijs, Lutgarde Aparicio, Lucas S. Huang, Qi-Fang Wei, Fang-Fei Yu, Yu-Ling Barochiner, Jessica Sheng, Chang-Sheng Yang, Wen-Yi Niiranen, Teemu J. Boggia, José Zhang, Zhen-Yu Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza Tikhonoff, Valérie Wojciechowska, Wiktoria Casiglia, Edoardo Narkiewicz, Krzysztof Filipovský, Jan Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina Wang, Ji-Guang Li, Yan Staessen, Jan A. Hypertension Original Articles BACKGROUND: Whether cardiovascular risk is more tightly associated with central (cSBP) than brachial (bSBP) systolic pressure remains debated, because of their close correlation and uncertain thresholds to differentiate cSBP into normotension versus hypertension. METHODS: In a person-level meta-analysis of the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n=5576; 54.1% women; mean age 54.2 years), outcome-driven thresholds for cSBP were determined and whether the cross-classification of cSBP and bSBP improved risk stratification was explored. cSBP was tonometrically estimated from the radial pulse wave using SphygmoCor software. RESULTS: Over 4.1 years (median), 255 composite cardiovascular end points occurred. In multivariable bootstrapped analyses, cSBP thresholds (in mm Hg) of 110.5 (95% CI, 109.1–111.8), 120.2 (119.4–121.0), 130.0 (129.6–130.3), and 149.5 (148.4–150.5) generated 5-year cardiovascular risks equivalent to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association bSBP thresholds of 120, 130, 140, and 160. Applying 120/130 mm Hg as cSBP/bSBP thresholds delineated concordant central and brachial normotension (43.1%) and hypertension (48.2%) versus isolated brachial hypertension (5.0%) and isolated central hypertension (3.7%). With concordant normotension as reference, the multivariable hazard ratios for the cardiovascular end point were 1.30 (95% CI, 0.58–2.94) for isolated brachial hypertension, 2.28 (1.21–4.30) for isolated central hypertension, and 2.02 (1.41–2.91) for concordant hypertension. The increased cardiovascular risk associated with isolated central and concordant hypertension was paralleled by cerebrovascular end points with hazard ratios of 3.71 (1.37–10.06) and 2.60 (1.35–5.00), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the brachial blood pressure status, central hypertension increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk indicating the importance of controlling central hypertension. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-04 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8997688/ /pubmed/35240865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18773 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Hypertension is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cheng, Yi-Bang
Thijs, Lutgarde
Aparicio, Lucas S.
Huang, Qi-Fang
Wei, Fang-Fei
Yu, Yu-Ling
Barochiner, Jessica
Sheng, Chang-Sheng
Yang, Wen-Yi
Niiranen, Teemu J.
Boggia, José
Zhang, Zhen-Yu
Stolarz-Skrzypek, Katarzyna
Gilis-Malinowska, Natasza
Tikhonoff, Valérie
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Casiglia, Edoardo
Narkiewicz, Krzysztof
Filipovský, Jan
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina
Wang, Ji-Guang
Li, Yan
Staessen, Jan A.
Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title_full Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title_fullStr Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title_full_unstemmed Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title_short Risk Stratification by Cross-Classification of Central and Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure
title_sort risk stratification by cross-classification of central and brachial systolic blood pressure
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35240865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18773
work_keys_str_mv AT chengyibang riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT thijslutgarde riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT apariciolucass riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT huangqifang riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT weifangfei riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT yuyuling riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT barochinerjessica riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT shengchangsheng riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT yangwenyi riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT niiranenteemuj riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT boggiajose riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT zhangzhenyu riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT stolarzskrzypekkatarzyna riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT gilismalinowskanatasza riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT tikhonoffvalerie riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT wojciechowskawiktoria riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT casigliaedoardo riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT narkiewiczkrzysztof riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT filipovskyjan riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT kaweckajaszczkalina riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT wangjiguang riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT liyan riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT staessenjana riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure
AT riskstratificationbycrossclassificationofcentralandbrachialsystolicbloodpressure