Cargando…

Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real time RT-PCR) testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, to expand the testing capacity, new SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) have been implemented. Ag-RDTs are more rapid, but l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cattelan, Anna Maria, Sasset, Lolita, Zabeo, Federico, Ferrari, Anna, Rossi, Lucia, Mazzitelli, Maria, Cocchio, Silvia, Baldo, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073826
_version_ 1784684832470597632
author Cattelan, Anna Maria
Sasset, Lolita
Zabeo, Federico
Ferrari, Anna
Rossi, Lucia
Mazzitelli, Maria
Cocchio, Silvia
Baldo, Vincenzo
author_facet Cattelan, Anna Maria
Sasset, Lolita
Zabeo, Federico
Ferrari, Anna
Rossi, Lucia
Mazzitelli, Maria
Cocchio, Silvia
Baldo, Vincenzo
author_sort Cattelan, Anna Maria
collection PubMed
description Background: Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real time RT-PCR) testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, to expand the testing capacity, new SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) have been implemented. Ag-RDTs are more rapid, but less reliable in terms of sensitivity, and real-life data on their performance in comparison with the real time RT-PCR test are lacking. Methods: We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of the third-generation antigenic swab LumiraDx™ compared with real time RT-PCR in a retrospective cohort study at the Infectious Diseases Unit of Padua. All of the patients who were consecutively tested for SARS-CoV-2 in our centre (by both real time RT-PCR and Ag-RTD LumiraDx(TM)) from 19 January to 30 May 2021, were included. Cycle-threshold (Ct) values of positive real time RT-PCR were recorded as well as the number of days from symptoms’ onset to testing. Results: Among the 282 patients included, 80.9% (N = 228) tested positive to real time RT-PCR, and among these, 174 tested positive also to LumiraDx™. Compared with real time RT-PCR, which is considered as the gold standard for the assessment of the presence/absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, LumiraDx™ showed an overall sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 94.4%. Sensitivity increased to 91% when testing was performed <10 days from symptoms’ onset, and to 95% when considering Ct < 25. Multivariable binomial logistic regression showed that false negative LumiraDx™ results were significantly associated with high Ct values, and with further testing from symptoms’ onset. Conclusions: The results of our study suggested that the LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay may be appropriate for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in its early phase when the test largely meets the performance requirements of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8997977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89979772022-04-12 Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study Cattelan, Anna Maria Sasset, Lolita Zabeo, Federico Ferrari, Anna Rossi, Lucia Mazzitelli, Maria Cocchio, Silvia Baldo, Vincenzo Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: Real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real time RT-PCR) testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, to expand the testing capacity, new SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDTs) have been implemented. Ag-RDTs are more rapid, but less reliable in terms of sensitivity, and real-life data on their performance in comparison with the real time RT-PCR test are lacking. Methods: We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of the third-generation antigenic swab LumiraDx™ compared with real time RT-PCR in a retrospective cohort study at the Infectious Diseases Unit of Padua. All of the patients who were consecutively tested for SARS-CoV-2 in our centre (by both real time RT-PCR and Ag-RTD LumiraDx(TM)) from 19 January to 30 May 2021, were included. Cycle-threshold (Ct) values of positive real time RT-PCR were recorded as well as the number of days from symptoms’ onset to testing. Results: Among the 282 patients included, 80.9% (N = 228) tested positive to real time RT-PCR, and among these, 174 tested positive also to LumiraDx™. Compared with real time RT-PCR, which is considered as the gold standard for the assessment of the presence/absence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, LumiraDx™ showed an overall sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 94.4%. Sensitivity increased to 91% when testing was performed <10 days from symptoms’ onset, and to 95% when considering Ct < 25. Multivariable binomial logistic regression showed that false negative LumiraDx™ results were significantly associated with high Ct values, and with further testing from symptoms’ onset. Conclusions: The results of our study suggested that the LumiraDx™ SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay may be appropriate for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in its early phase when the test largely meets the performance requirements of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). MDPI 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8997977/ /pubmed/35409513 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073826 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cattelan, Anna Maria
Sasset, Lolita
Zabeo, Federico
Ferrari, Anna
Rossi, Lucia
Mazzitelli, Maria
Cocchio, Silvia
Baldo, Vincenzo
Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDx(TM) vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort rapid antigen test lumiradx(tm) vs. real time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of sars-cov-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8997977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409513
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073826
work_keys_str_mv AT cattelanannamaria rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sassetlolita rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zabeofederico rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ferrarianna rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rossilucia rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mazzitellimaria rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cocchiosilvia rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT baldovincenzo rapidantigentestlumiradxtmvsrealtimepolymerasechainreactionforthediagnosisofsarscov2infectionaretrospectivecohortstudy