Cargando…

Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs

The demand for human bioengineered tissue constructs is growing in response to the worldwide movement away from the use of animals for testing of new chemicals, drug screening and household products. Presently, constructs are manufactured and delivered just in time, resulting in delays and high cost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Lia H., Brockbank, Kelvin G. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35406679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11071115
_version_ 1784684850422218752
author Campbell, Lia H.
Brockbank, Kelvin G. M.
author_facet Campbell, Lia H.
Brockbank, Kelvin G. M.
author_sort Campbell, Lia H.
collection PubMed
description The demand for human bioengineered tissue constructs is growing in response to the worldwide movement away from the use of animals for testing of new chemicals, drug screening and household products. Presently, constructs are manufactured and delivered just in time, resulting in delays and high costs of manufacturing. Cryopreservation and banking would speed up delivery times and permit cost reduction due to larger scale manufacturing. Our objective in these studies was development of ice-free vitrification formulations and protocols using human bioengineered epithelial constructs that could be scaled up from individual constructs to 24-well plates. Initial experiments using single EpiDerm constructs in vials demonstrated viability >80% of untreated control, significantly higher than our best freezing strategy. Further studies focused on optimization and evaluation of ice-free vitrification strategies. Vitrification experiments with 55% (VS55) and 70% (VS70) cryoprotectant (CPA) formulations produced constructs with good viability shortly after rewarming, but viability decreased in the next days, post-rewarming in vitro. Protocol changes contributed to improved outcomes over time in vitro. We then transitioned from using glass vials with 1 construct to deep-well plates holding up to 24 individual constructs. Construct viability was maintained at >80% post-warming viability and >70% viability on days 1–3 in vitro. Similar viability was demonstrated for other related tissue constructs. Furthermore, we demonstrated maintenance of viability after 2–7 months of storage below −135 °C.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8998050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89980502022-04-12 Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs Campbell, Lia H. Brockbank, Kelvin G. M. Cells Article The demand for human bioengineered tissue constructs is growing in response to the worldwide movement away from the use of animals for testing of new chemicals, drug screening and household products. Presently, constructs are manufactured and delivered just in time, resulting in delays and high costs of manufacturing. Cryopreservation and banking would speed up delivery times and permit cost reduction due to larger scale manufacturing. Our objective in these studies was development of ice-free vitrification formulations and protocols using human bioengineered epithelial constructs that could be scaled up from individual constructs to 24-well plates. Initial experiments using single EpiDerm constructs in vials demonstrated viability >80% of untreated control, significantly higher than our best freezing strategy. Further studies focused on optimization and evaluation of ice-free vitrification strategies. Vitrification experiments with 55% (VS55) and 70% (VS70) cryoprotectant (CPA) formulations produced constructs with good viability shortly after rewarming, but viability decreased in the next days, post-rewarming in vitro. Protocol changes contributed to improved outcomes over time in vitro. We then transitioned from using glass vials with 1 construct to deep-well plates holding up to 24 individual constructs. Construct viability was maintained at >80% post-warming viability and >70% viability on days 1–3 in vitro. Similar viability was demonstrated for other related tissue constructs. Furthermore, we demonstrated maintenance of viability after 2–7 months of storage below −135 °C. MDPI 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8998050/ /pubmed/35406679 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11071115 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Campbell, Lia H.
Brockbank, Kelvin G. M.
Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title_full Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title_fullStr Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title_short Development of a Vitrification Preservation Process for Bioengineered Epithelial Constructs
title_sort development of a vitrification preservation process for bioengineered epithelial constructs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35406679
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11071115
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellliah developmentofavitrificationpreservationprocessforbioengineeredepithelialconstructs
AT brockbankkelvingm developmentofavitrificationpreservationprocessforbioengineeredepithelialconstructs