Cargando…
Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context
To assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Method: Cross-sectional study with non-probabilistic (snow-ball) sampling method. The assessment was performed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074402 |
_version_ | 1784684900596580352 |
---|---|
author | Garcia, Gracielle Pereira Aires Fracarolli, Isabela Fernanda Larios dos Santos, Heloisa Ehmke Cardoso de Oliveira, Samuel Andrade Martins, Bianca Gonzalez Santin Junior, Lacir José Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Rocha, Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi |
author_facet | Garcia, Gracielle Pereira Aires Fracarolli, Isabela Fernanda Larios dos Santos, Heloisa Ehmke Cardoso de Oliveira, Samuel Andrade Martins, Bianca Gonzalez Santin Junior, Lacir José Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Rocha, Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi |
author_sort | Garcia, Gracielle Pereira Aires |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Method: Cross-sectional study with non-probabilistic (snow-ball) sampling method. The assessment was performed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the prevalence of symptoms severity was calculated by point and 95% confidence interval. The analysis of the psychometric properties of DASS-21 was performed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the following goodness of fit indices: χ(2)/df (chi-square ratio by degrees of freedom), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with a 90% confidence interval. Results: The study participants were 529 health professionals (82.4% women and 66.7% nursing professionals). CFA of the DASS-21 structural model presented adequate fit for the sample (χ(2)/df = 3.530; CFI = 0.979; TLI = 0.976; RMSEA = 0.069). Regarding prevalence, moderate to extremely severe symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress were found in 48.6%, 55.0% and 47.9% of the participants, respectively. Conclusion: The use of DASS-21 confirmed the validity and reliability of the data. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in the participants indicated a high risk of mental illness in health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8998261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89982612022-04-12 Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context Garcia, Gracielle Pereira Aires Fracarolli, Isabela Fernanda Larios dos Santos, Heloisa Ehmke Cardoso de Oliveira, Samuel Andrade Martins, Bianca Gonzalez Santin Junior, Lacir José Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Rocha, Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article To assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic context. Method: Cross-sectional study with non-probabilistic (snow-ball) sampling method. The assessment was performed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the prevalence of symptoms severity was calculated by point and 95% confidence interval. The analysis of the psychometric properties of DASS-21 was performed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the following goodness of fit indices: χ(2)/df (chi-square ratio by degrees of freedom), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) with a 90% confidence interval. Results: The study participants were 529 health professionals (82.4% women and 66.7% nursing professionals). CFA of the DASS-21 structural model presented adequate fit for the sample (χ(2)/df = 3.530; CFI = 0.979; TLI = 0.976; RMSEA = 0.069). Regarding prevalence, moderate to extremely severe symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress were found in 48.6%, 55.0% and 47.9% of the participants, respectively. Conclusion: The use of DASS-21 confirmed the validity and reliability of the data. The prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in the participants indicated a high risk of mental illness in health professionals in the COVID-19 pandemic. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8998261/ /pubmed/35410085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074402 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Garcia, Gracielle Pereira Aires Fracarolli, Isabela Fernanda Larios dos Santos, Heloisa Ehmke Cardoso de Oliveira, Samuel Andrade Martins, Bianca Gonzalez Santin Junior, Lacir José Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci Rocha, Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title | Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title_full | Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title_fullStr | Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title_full_unstemmed | Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title_short | Depression, Anxiety and Stress in Health Professionals in the COVID-19 Context |
title_sort | depression, anxiety and stress in health professionals in the covid-19 context |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciagraciellepereiraaires depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT fracarolliisabelafernandalarios depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT dossantosheloisaehmkecardoso depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT deoliveirasamuelandrade depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT martinsbiancagonzalez depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT santinjuniorlacirjose depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT marzialemariahelenapalucci depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context AT rochafernandaludmillarossi depressionanxietyandstressinhealthprofessionalsinthecovid19context |