Cargando…

Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review

Background: Children aged 2–11 years spend significant hours per week in early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary schools. Whilst considered important environments to influence children’s food intake, there is heterogeneity in the tools utilised to assess food provision in these setting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elford, Audrey, Gwee, Cherice, Veal, Maliney, Jani, Rati, Sambell, Ros, Kashef, Shabnam, Love, Penelope
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074096
_version_ 1784684916597850112
author Elford, Audrey
Gwee, Cherice
Veal, Maliney
Jani, Rati
Sambell, Ros
Kashef, Shabnam
Love, Penelope
author_facet Elford, Audrey
Gwee, Cherice
Veal, Maliney
Jani, Rati
Sambell, Ros
Kashef, Shabnam
Love, Penelope
author_sort Elford, Audrey
collection PubMed
description Background: Children aged 2–11 years spend significant hours per week in early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary schools. Whilst considered important environments to influence children’s food intake, there is heterogeneity in the tools utilised to assess food provision in these settings. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate tools used to measure food provision in ECEC and primary schools. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) was followed. Publications (2003–2020) that implemented, validated, or developed measurement tools to assess food provision within ECEC or primary schools were included. Two reviewers extracted and evaluated studies, cross checked by a third reviewer and verified by all authors. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC) was used to critically appraise each study. Results: Eighty-two studies were included in the review. Seven measurement tools were identified, namely, Menu review; Observation; Weighed food protocol; Questionnaire/survey; Digital photography; Quick menu audit; and Web-based menu assessment. An evidence-based evaluation was conducted for each tool. Conclusions: The weighed food protocol was found to be the most popular and accurate measurement tool to assess individual-level intake. Future research is recommended to develop and validate a tool to assess service-level food provision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8998327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89983272022-04-12 Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review Elford, Audrey Gwee, Cherice Veal, Maliney Jani, Rati Sambell, Ros Kashef, Shabnam Love, Penelope Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Background: Children aged 2–11 years spend significant hours per week in early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary schools. Whilst considered important environments to influence children’s food intake, there is heterogeneity in the tools utilised to assess food provision in these settings. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate tools used to measure food provision in ECEC and primary schools. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) was followed. Publications (2003–2020) that implemented, validated, or developed measurement tools to assess food provision within ECEC or primary schools were included. Two reviewers extracted and evaluated studies, cross checked by a third reviewer and verified by all authors. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC) was used to critically appraise each study. Results: Eighty-two studies were included in the review. Seven measurement tools were identified, namely, Menu review; Observation; Weighed food protocol; Questionnaire/survey; Digital photography; Quick menu audit; and Web-based menu assessment. An evidence-based evaluation was conducted for each tool. Conclusions: The weighed food protocol was found to be the most popular and accurate measurement tool to assess individual-level intake. Future research is recommended to develop and validate a tool to assess service-level food provision. MDPI 2022-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8998327/ /pubmed/35409781 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074096 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Elford, Audrey
Gwee, Cherice
Veal, Maliney
Jani, Rati
Sambell, Ros
Kashef, Shabnam
Love, Penelope
Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title_full Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title_short Identification and Evaluation of Tools Utilised for Measuring Food Provision in Childcare Centres and Primary Schools: A Systematic Review
title_sort identification and evaluation of tools utilised for measuring food provision in childcare centres and primary schools: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409781
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074096
work_keys_str_mv AT elfordaudrey identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT gweecherice identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT vealmaliney identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT janirati identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT sambellros identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT kashefshabnam identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview
AT lovepenelope identificationandevaluationoftoolsutilisedformeasuringfoodprovisioninchildcarecentresandprimaryschoolsasystematicreview