Cargando…
Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review
Introduction: Exposure to hazardous chemicals released during hairdressing activities from hair care products puts hairdressers at risk of adverse health effects. Safety assessments of hair products are mainly focused on consumers, but exposure for professional hairdressers might be substantially hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074176 |
_version_ | 1784684949802057728 |
---|---|
author | Kezic, Sanja Nunez, Roberto Babić, Željka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin S. Johansen, Jeanne D. John, Swen M. Macan, Marija Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Weinert, Patricia Turk, Rajka Macan, Jelena van der Molen, Henk F. |
author_facet | Kezic, Sanja Nunez, Roberto Babić, Željka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin S. Johansen, Jeanne D. John, Swen M. Macan, Marija Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Weinert, Patricia Turk, Rajka Macan, Jelena van der Molen, Henk F. |
author_sort | Kezic, Sanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Exposure to hazardous chemicals released during hairdressing activities from hair care products puts hairdressers at risk of adverse health effects. Safety assessments of hair products are mainly focused on consumers, but exposure for professional hairdressers might be substantially higher. Objective: To identify and assess available research data on inhalation exposures of professional hairdressers. Methods: A systematic search of studies between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2021 was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and in Cochrane registry, toxicological dossiers of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Commission as well as the German MAK Commission. Studies reporting quantitative data on airborne concentrations of chemicals in the hairdresser’s workplace were considered. The outcome was an airborne concentration of chemicals in the working environment, which was compared, when possible, with current occupational exposure limits (OEL) or guidance levels. Results: In total, 23 studies performed in 14 countries were included. The average number of hairdressing salons per study was 22 (range 1–62). Chemicals most frequently measured were formaldehyde (n = 8), ammonia (n = 5), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) (n = 5), and toluene (n = 4). More than fifty other chemicals were measured in one to three studies, including various aromatic and aliphatic organic solvents, hydrogen peroxide, persulfate, and particulate matter. Most studies reported environmental air concentrations, while personal exposure was measured only in seven studies. The measured air concentrations of formaldehyde, ammonia, and TVOC exceeded OEL or guidance values in some studies. There was large variability in measuring conditions and reported air concentrations differed strongly within and between studies. Conclusion: Hairdressers are exposed to a wide spectrum of hazardous chemicals, often simultaneously. Airborne concentrations of pollutants depend on salon characteristics such as ventilation and the number of customers but also on used products that are often country- or client-specific. For exposure to formaldehyde, ammonia, and TVOC exceeding OELs or guidance values for indoor air was observed. Therefore, occupational exposure should be taken into account by safety regulations for hair care products. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8998463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89984632022-04-12 Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review Kezic, Sanja Nunez, Roberto Babić, Željka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin S. Johansen, Jeanne D. John, Swen M. Macan, Marija Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Weinert, Patricia Turk, Rajka Macan, Jelena van der Molen, Henk F. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Introduction: Exposure to hazardous chemicals released during hairdressing activities from hair care products puts hairdressers at risk of adverse health effects. Safety assessments of hair products are mainly focused on consumers, but exposure for professional hairdressers might be substantially higher. Objective: To identify and assess available research data on inhalation exposures of professional hairdressers. Methods: A systematic search of studies between 1 January 2000 and 30 April 2021 was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and in Cochrane registry, toxicological dossiers of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) of the European Commission as well as the German MAK Commission. Studies reporting quantitative data on airborne concentrations of chemicals in the hairdresser’s workplace were considered. The outcome was an airborne concentration of chemicals in the working environment, which was compared, when possible, with current occupational exposure limits (OEL) or guidance levels. Results: In total, 23 studies performed in 14 countries were included. The average number of hairdressing salons per study was 22 (range 1–62). Chemicals most frequently measured were formaldehyde (n = 8), ammonia (n = 5), total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) (n = 5), and toluene (n = 4). More than fifty other chemicals were measured in one to three studies, including various aromatic and aliphatic organic solvents, hydrogen peroxide, persulfate, and particulate matter. Most studies reported environmental air concentrations, while personal exposure was measured only in seven studies. The measured air concentrations of formaldehyde, ammonia, and TVOC exceeded OEL or guidance values in some studies. There was large variability in measuring conditions and reported air concentrations differed strongly within and between studies. Conclusion: Hairdressers are exposed to a wide spectrum of hazardous chemicals, often simultaneously. Airborne concentrations of pollutants depend on salon characteristics such as ventilation and the number of customers but also on used products that are often country- or client-specific. For exposure to formaldehyde, ammonia, and TVOC exceeding OELs or guidance values for indoor air was observed. Therefore, occupational exposure should be taken into account by safety regulations for hair care products. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8998463/ /pubmed/35409860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074176 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kezic, Sanja Nunez, Roberto Babić, Željka Hallmann, Sarah Havmose, Martin S. Johansen, Jeanne D. John, Swen M. Macan, Marija Symanzik, Cara Uter, Wolfgang Weinert, Patricia Turk, Rajka Macan, Jelena van der Molen, Henk F. Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title | Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Occupational Exposure of Hairdressers to Airborne Hazardous Chemicals: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | occupational exposure of hairdressers to airborne hazardous chemicals: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35409860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kezicsanja occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT nunezroberto occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT babiczeljka occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT hallmannsarah occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT havmosemartins occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT johansenjeanned occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT johnswenm occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT macanmarija occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT symanzikcara occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT uterwolfgang occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT weinertpatricia occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT turkrajka occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT macanjelena occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview AT vandermolenhenkf occupationalexposureofhairdresserstoairbornehazardouschemicalsascopingreview |