Cargando…

Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanics study. OBJECTIVE: A proof-of-concept study to quantify whether or not differences in segmental mobility associated with spinal instability could be detected by a robotic distraction system. METHODS: Testing was performed in fresh human cadaveric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McAfee, Paul C., Eisermann, Lukas, Mullinix, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211059178
_version_ 1784684952800985088
author McAfee, Paul C.
Eisermann, Lukas
Mullinix, Kenneth
author_facet McAfee, Paul C.
Eisermann, Lukas
Mullinix, Kenneth
author_sort McAfee, Paul C.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanics study. OBJECTIVE: A proof-of-concept study to quantify whether or not differences in segmental mobility associated with spinal instability could be detected by a robotic distraction system. METHODS: Testing was performed in fresh human cadaveric tissue. A prototype Robotic Middle Column Distractor was attached unilaterally to the pedicles of L3-4. Distraction forces up to 150 N were applied first in the intact state, and following discectomy of L3-4. Motions were recorded by time-indexed visual and fluoroscopic images, and analyzed to measure actual motions achieved. Functions of the robot unit were monitored during the procedure and evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: A difference of 2.5 mm in z-axis motion was detected at 150 N load between the intact and post-discectomy states. The robot coupled with the image analysis method was able to clearly detect the difference between the intact (“stable”) and post-discectomy (“unstable”) spine. Data analysis of fluoroscopic images taken during the procedure showed greater motion than perceived by the investigators from qualitative review of visual data. All monitored robot functions performed within design parameters without error. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of utilizing an intraoperative robotic distractor to measure the amount of spinal mobility present at a level. This could lead to an important clinical tool for both diagnostic functions as well as operative assist functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8998475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89984752022-04-12 Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability McAfee, Paul C. Eisermann, Lukas Mullinix, Kenneth Global Spine J Special Issue Articles STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanics study. OBJECTIVE: A proof-of-concept study to quantify whether or not differences in segmental mobility associated with spinal instability could be detected by a robotic distraction system. METHODS: Testing was performed in fresh human cadaveric tissue. A prototype Robotic Middle Column Distractor was attached unilaterally to the pedicles of L3-4. Distraction forces up to 150 N were applied first in the intact state, and following discectomy of L3-4. Motions were recorded by time-indexed visual and fluoroscopic images, and analyzed to measure actual motions achieved. Functions of the robot unit were monitored during the procedure and evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: A difference of 2.5 mm in z-axis motion was detected at 150 N load between the intact and post-discectomy states. The robot coupled with the image analysis method was able to clearly detect the difference between the intact (“stable”) and post-discectomy (“unstable”) spine. Data analysis of fluoroscopic images taken during the procedure showed greater motion than perceived by the investigators from qualitative review of visual data. All monitored robot functions performed within design parameters without error. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of utilizing an intraoperative robotic distractor to measure the amount of spinal mobility present at a level. This could lead to an important clinical tool for both diagnostic functions as well as operative assist functions. SAGE Publications 2021-12-07 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8998475/ /pubmed/34875187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211059178 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
McAfee, Paul C.
Eisermann, Lukas
Mullinix, Kenneth
Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title_full Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title_fullStr Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title_full_unstemmed Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title_short Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability
title_sort robot for ligament tensioning and assessment of spinal stability
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8998475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682211059178
work_keys_str_mv AT mcafeepaulc robotforligamenttensioningandassessmentofspinalstability
AT eisermannlukas robotforligamenttensioningandassessmentofspinalstability
AT mullinixkenneth robotforligamenttensioningandassessmentofspinalstability