Cargando…
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834 |
_version_ | 1784685201948934144 |
---|---|
author | Matonti, Frédéric Korobelnik, Jean-François Dot, Corinne Gualino, Vincent Soler, Vincent Mrejen, Sarah Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Baillif, Stéphanie Streho, Maté Gascon, Pierre Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Kodjikian, Laurent |
author_facet | Matonti, Frédéric Korobelnik, Jean-François Dot, Corinne Gualino, Vincent Soler, Vincent Mrejen, Sarah Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Baillif, Stéphanie Streho, Maté Gascon, Pierre Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Kodjikian, Laurent |
author_sort | Matonti, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8999505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89995052022-04-12 Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis Matonti, Frédéric Korobelnik, Jean-François Dot, Corinne Gualino, Vincent Soler, Vincent Mrejen, Sarah Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Baillif, Stéphanie Streho, Maté Gascon, Pierre Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Kodjikian, Laurent J Clin Med Article Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number. MDPI 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8999505/ /pubmed/35407439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Matonti, Frédéric Korobelnik, Jean-François Dot, Corinne Gualino, Vincent Soler, Vincent Mrejen, Sarah Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Baillif, Stéphanie Streho, Maté Gascon, Pierre Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Kodjikian, Laurent Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matontifrederic comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT korobelnikjeanfrancois comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT dotcorinne comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT gualinovincent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT solervincent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT mrejensarah comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT delyfermarienoelle comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT baillifstephanie comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT strehomate comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT gasconpierre comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT creuzotgarchercatherine comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis AT kodjikianlaurent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis |