Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis

Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matonti, Frédéric, Korobelnik, Jean-François, Dot, Corinne, Gualino, Vincent, Soler, Vincent, Mrejen, Sarah, Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle, Baillif, Stéphanie, Streho, Maté, Gascon, Pierre, Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine, Kodjikian, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834
_version_ 1784685201948934144
author Matonti, Frédéric
Korobelnik, Jean-François
Dot, Corinne
Gualino, Vincent
Soler, Vincent
Mrejen, Sarah
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Baillif, Stéphanie
Streho, Maté
Gascon, Pierre
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Kodjikian, Laurent
author_facet Matonti, Frédéric
Korobelnik, Jean-François
Dot, Corinne
Gualino, Vincent
Soler, Vincent
Mrejen, Sarah
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Baillif, Stéphanie
Streho, Maté
Gascon, Pierre
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Kodjikian, Laurent
author_sort Matonti, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8999505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89995052022-04-12 Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis Matonti, Frédéric Korobelnik, Jean-François Dot, Corinne Gualino, Vincent Soler, Vincent Mrejen, Sarah Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle Baillif, Stéphanie Streho, Maté Gascon, Pierre Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine Kodjikian, Laurent J Clin Med Article Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number. MDPI 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8999505/ /pubmed/35407439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Matonti, Frédéric
Korobelnik, Jean-François
Dot, Corinne
Gualino, Vincent
Soler, Vincent
Mrejen, Sarah
Delyfer, Marie-Noëlle
Baillif, Stéphanie
Streho, Maté
Gascon, Pierre
Creuzot-Garcher, Catherine
Kodjikian, Laurent
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapies for Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071834
work_keys_str_mv AT matontifrederic comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT korobelnikjeanfrancois comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT dotcorinne comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT gualinovincent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT solervincent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT mrejensarah comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT delyfermarienoelle comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT baillifstephanie comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT strehomate comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT gasconpierre comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT creuzotgarchercatherine comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis
AT kodjikianlaurent comparativeeffectivenessofintravitrealantivascularendothelialgrowthfactortherapiesformanagingneovascularagerelatedmaculardegenerationametaanalysis