Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a safe and efficient treatment in patients with an atrioventricular accessory pathway (AP). Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems are useful during CA of AP, especially for reducing fluoroscopy. There are limited data about the feasibility of CA procedures per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodkiewicz, Dariusz, Koźluk, Edward, Piątkowska, Agnieszka, Gąsecka, Aleksandra, Krzemiński, Krzysztof, Opolski, Grzegorz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071814
_version_ 1784685210435059712
author Rodkiewicz, Dariusz
Koźluk, Edward
Piątkowska, Agnieszka
Gąsecka, Aleksandra
Krzemiński, Krzysztof
Opolski, Grzegorz
author_facet Rodkiewicz, Dariusz
Koźluk, Edward
Piątkowska, Agnieszka
Gąsecka, Aleksandra
Krzemiński, Krzysztof
Opolski, Grzegorz
author_sort Rodkiewicz, Dariusz
collection PubMed
description Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a safe and efficient treatment in patients with an atrioventricular accessory pathway (AP). Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems are useful during CA of AP, especially for reducing fluoroscopy. There are limited data about the feasibility of CA procedures performed with the use of the EAM system entirely without fluoroscopy in adults with AP. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of CA with the use of EAM without fluoroscopy, compared to CA with EAM and fluoroscopy in patients with AP. Methods: The study included 83 consecutive patients (age 38.25 ± 15.8 years), who were subjected to CA for AP. In 40 patients CA was performed with the use of EAM without fluoroscopy (EAM group), and in 43 patients CA was performed with EAM and fluoroscopy (control group). Baseline characteristics, procedure parameters and complications were obtained from the medical records. Data on permanent success rate was obtained after the mean follow-up time of 1 year. Primary outcomes were acute procedural success rate, long term success rate at 1-year follow-up and complications. Secondary outcomes were the procedure time and number of applications. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, except for the AP locations. Right-sided AP was more common in the EAM group, while left-sided AP was more common in the control group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.004, respectively). Acute procedural success was achieved in 38 patients (95.0%) in the EAM group and in 39 patients (90.7%) in the control group (p = 0.449). Long term success rate was achieved in 36 patients (90.0%) in the EAM group and in 36 (83.7%) patients in the control group (p = 0.399). There was one minor complication in the form of RBBB in the EAM group (p = 0.138). The mean procedure time was shorter in the EAM group compared to the control group (93.0 ± 58.3 min vs. 127.6 ± 57.5 min; p = 0.009). Conclusions: CA of both right-sided and left-sided AP completely guided by EAM without the use of fluoroscopy is feasible, safe and effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8999539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89995392022-04-12 Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway Rodkiewicz, Dariusz Koźluk, Edward Piątkowska, Agnieszka Gąsecka, Aleksandra Krzemiński, Krzysztof Opolski, Grzegorz J Clin Med Article Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a safe and efficient treatment in patients with an atrioventricular accessory pathway (AP). Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems are useful during CA of AP, especially for reducing fluoroscopy. There are limited data about the feasibility of CA procedures performed with the use of the EAM system entirely without fluoroscopy in adults with AP. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility, efficacy and safety of CA with the use of EAM without fluoroscopy, compared to CA with EAM and fluoroscopy in patients with AP. Methods: The study included 83 consecutive patients (age 38.25 ± 15.8 years), who were subjected to CA for AP. In 40 patients CA was performed with the use of EAM without fluoroscopy (EAM group), and in 43 patients CA was performed with EAM and fluoroscopy (control group). Baseline characteristics, procedure parameters and complications were obtained from the medical records. Data on permanent success rate was obtained after the mean follow-up time of 1 year. Primary outcomes were acute procedural success rate, long term success rate at 1-year follow-up and complications. Secondary outcomes were the procedure time and number of applications. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups, except for the AP locations. Right-sided AP was more common in the EAM group, while left-sided AP was more common in the control group (p = 0.007 and p = 0.004, respectively). Acute procedural success was achieved in 38 patients (95.0%) in the EAM group and in 39 patients (90.7%) in the control group (p = 0.449). Long term success rate was achieved in 36 patients (90.0%) in the EAM group and in 36 (83.7%) patients in the control group (p = 0.399). There was one minor complication in the form of RBBB in the EAM group (p = 0.138). The mean procedure time was shorter in the EAM group compared to the control group (93.0 ± 58.3 min vs. 127.6 ± 57.5 min; p = 0.009). Conclusions: CA of both right-sided and left-sided AP completely guided by EAM without the use of fluoroscopy is feasible, safe and effective. MDPI 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8999539/ /pubmed/35407422 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071814 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rodkiewicz, Dariusz
Koźluk, Edward
Piątkowska, Agnieszka
Gąsecka, Aleksandra
Krzemiński, Krzysztof
Opolski, Grzegorz
Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Zero-Fluoroscopy Approach during Catheter Ablation of Accessory Pathway
title_sort efficacy and safety of zero-fluoroscopy approach during catheter ablation of accessory pathway
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407422
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071814
work_keys_str_mv AT rodkiewiczdariusz efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway
AT kozlukedward efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway
AT piatkowskaagnieszka efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway
AT gaseckaaleksandra efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway
AT krzeminskikrzysztof efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway
AT opolskigrzegorz efficacyandsafetyofzerofluoroscopyapproachduringcatheterablationofaccessorypathway