Cargando…
Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply?
Comparable outcomes were published using a buccal mucosa graft (BMG) from the cheek and a lingual mucosa graft (LMG) from the sublingual area, for urethral augmentation or substitution. To date, no histological comparison between both grafts has been conducted. We histologically assessed BMG and LMG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072064 |
_version_ | 1784685210906918912 |
---|---|
author | Campos-Juanatey, Felix Azueta Etxebarria, Ainara Calleja Hermosa, Paola Marcos Gonzalez, Sara Alonso Mediavilla, Eneko Correas Gomez, Miguel Angel Portillo Martin, Jose Antonio Gutierrrez Baños, Jose Luis |
author_facet | Campos-Juanatey, Felix Azueta Etxebarria, Ainara Calleja Hermosa, Paola Marcos Gonzalez, Sara Alonso Mediavilla, Eneko Correas Gomez, Miguel Angel Portillo Martin, Jose Antonio Gutierrrez Baños, Jose Luis |
author_sort | Campos-Juanatey, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | Comparable outcomes were published using a buccal mucosa graft (BMG) from the cheek and a lingual mucosa graft (LMG) from the sublingual area, for urethral augmentation or substitution. To date, no histological comparison between both grafts has been conducted. We histologically assessed BMG and LMG harvested during urethral surgeries, aiming to compare graft properties and vascular support. We conducted a prospective single cohort study, including oral mucosa urethroplasty patients. During surgery, graft dimensions and donor sites were collected, and a 0.5 × 0.5 cm sample was obtained from the prepared graft. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were sliced at 4 micrometres (µm) and hematoxylin-eosin stained. Using a telepathology tool, all slides were digitalized and measured from 10× to 40× magnification. In each graft, global and individual layers thicknesses were assessed, including vascular density and area. Descriptive and comparative (parametrical and non-parametrical) statistical analysis occurred. We collected 57 grafts during 33 urethroplasties, with 30 BMG and 22 LMG, finally, included. The mean age was 56.6 (SD 15.2) years, and the mean graft length was 5.8 (SD 1.7) cm and the width was 1.7 (SD 0.4) cm. The median graft thickness was 1598.9 (IQR 1200–2100) µm, the mean epithelium layer was 510.2 (SD 223.7) µm, the median submucosa was 654 (IQR 378–943) µm. the median muscular was 477.6 (IQR 286–772) µm, the median vascular area was 5% (IQR 5–10), and the median adipose tissue area was 5% (IQR 0–20). LMG were significantly longer and narrower than BMG. Total graft thickness was similar between LMG and BMG, but the epithelium and submucosa layers were significantly thinner in LMG. The muscular layer was significantly thicker in LMG. Vascular density and vascular areas were not significantly different between both types of grafts. LMG showed significantly less adipose tissue compared with BMG. Our findings show LMG and BMG for urethroplasty surgeries share the same thickness and blood supply, despite having significantly different graft sizes as well as mucosal and submucosal layers thickness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8999541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89995412022-04-12 Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? Campos-Juanatey, Felix Azueta Etxebarria, Ainara Calleja Hermosa, Paola Marcos Gonzalez, Sara Alonso Mediavilla, Eneko Correas Gomez, Miguel Angel Portillo Martin, Jose Antonio Gutierrrez Baños, Jose Luis J Clin Med Article Comparable outcomes were published using a buccal mucosa graft (BMG) from the cheek and a lingual mucosa graft (LMG) from the sublingual area, for urethral augmentation or substitution. To date, no histological comparison between both grafts has been conducted. We histologically assessed BMG and LMG harvested during urethral surgeries, aiming to compare graft properties and vascular support. We conducted a prospective single cohort study, including oral mucosa urethroplasty patients. During surgery, graft dimensions and donor sites were collected, and a 0.5 × 0.5 cm sample was obtained from the prepared graft. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were sliced at 4 micrometres (µm) and hematoxylin-eosin stained. Using a telepathology tool, all slides were digitalized and measured from 10× to 40× magnification. In each graft, global and individual layers thicknesses were assessed, including vascular density and area. Descriptive and comparative (parametrical and non-parametrical) statistical analysis occurred. We collected 57 grafts during 33 urethroplasties, with 30 BMG and 22 LMG, finally, included. The mean age was 56.6 (SD 15.2) years, and the mean graft length was 5.8 (SD 1.7) cm and the width was 1.7 (SD 0.4) cm. The median graft thickness was 1598.9 (IQR 1200–2100) µm, the mean epithelium layer was 510.2 (SD 223.7) µm, the median submucosa was 654 (IQR 378–943) µm. the median muscular was 477.6 (IQR 286–772) µm, the median vascular area was 5% (IQR 5–10), and the median adipose tissue area was 5% (IQR 0–20). LMG were significantly longer and narrower than BMG. Total graft thickness was similar between LMG and BMG, but the epithelium and submucosa layers were significantly thinner in LMG. The muscular layer was significantly thicker in LMG. Vascular density and vascular areas were not significantly different between both types of grafts. LMG showed significantly less adipose tissue compared with BMG. Our findings show LMG and BMG for urethroplasty surgeries share the same thickness and blood supply, despite having significantly different graft sizes as well as mucosal and submucosal layers thickness. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8999541/ /pubmed/35407672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072064 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Campos-Juanatey, Felix Azueta Etxebarria, Ainara Calleja Hermosa, Paola Marcos Gonzalez, Sara Alonso Mediavilla, Eneko Correas Gomez, Miguel Angel Portillo Martin, Jose Antonio Gutierrrez Baños, Jose Luis Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title | Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title_full | Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title_fullStr | Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title_full_unstemmed | Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title_short | Histological Comparison of Buccal and Lingual Mucosa Grafts for Urethroplasty: Do They Share Tissue Structures and Vascular Supply? |
title_sort | histological comparison of buccal and lingual mucosa grafts for urethroplasty: do they share tissue structures and vascular supply? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407672 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camposjuanateyfelix histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT azuetaetxebarriaainara histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT callejahermosapaola histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT marcosgonzalezsara histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT alonsomediavillaeneko histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT correasgomezmiguelangel histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT portillomartinjoseantonio histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply AT gutierrrezbanosjoseluis histologicalcomparisonofbuccalandlingualmucosagraftsforurethroplastydotheysharetissuestructuresandvascularsupply |