Cargando…

The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept

Background: There is a need for a long-term evidence of implants placed in challenging conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of full-arch rehabilitations with the All-on-4 concept for implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations. Methods: This retrospective cohort st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Araújo Nobre, Miguel, Lopes, Armando, Antunes, Elsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071939
_version_ 1784685234105614336
author de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Lopes, Armando
Antunes, Elsa
author_facet de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Lopes, Armando
Antunes, Elsa
author_sort de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
collection PubMed
description Background: There is a need for a long-term evidence of implants placed in challenging conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of full-arch rehabilitations with the All-on-4 concept for implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 123 patients (dehiscence, n = 87 patients; fenestrations, n = 28 patients; both conditions, n = 8 patients), with a total of 192 implants in immediate function presenting dehiscence (n = 150), fenestrations (n = 40), or both conditions (n = 2). Primary outcome measures were cumulative implant survival (CSurR) and success (CSucR) rates. Secondary outcome measures were prosthetic survival, marginal bone loss, and incidence of biological complications. Results: CSurRs were 94.1% (overall), 95.6% (dehiscence), and 88.1% (fenestrations) at 10 years using the patient as the unit of analysis. Smoking affected implant failure significantly (p = 0.019). Implant-level CSurRs and CSucRs at 10 years were 96.2% and 93.5% (overall), 97.2% and 94.6% (dehiscence), and 90.0% and 87.6% (fenestrations), respectively. Average bone resorption at 5 and 10 years was 1.22 mm and 1.53 mm, respectively. Biological complications occurred in 18 patients (n = 18 implants). Conclusions: Implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations demonstrate good long-term outcomes with overall high success and survival rates and low average marginal bone resorption, despite an inferior outcome in implants with fenestrations and smoking’s negative effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8999632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89996322022-04-12 The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept de Araújo Nobre, Miguel Lopes, Armando Antunes, Elsa J Clin Med Article Background: There is a need for a long-term evidence of implants placed in challenging conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of full-arch rehabilitations with the All-on-4 concept for implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 123 patients (dehiscence, n = 87 patients; fenestrations, n = 28 patients; both conditions, n = 8 patients), with a total of 192 implants in immediate function presenting dehiscence (n = 150), fenestrations (n = 40), or both conditions (n = 2). Primary outcome measures were cumulative implant survival (CSurR) and success (CSucR) rates. Secondary outcome measures were prosthetic survival, marginal bone loss, and incidence of biological complications. Results: CSurRs were 94.1% (overall), 95.6% (dehiscence), and 88.1% (fenestrations) at 10 years using the patient as the unit of analysis. Smoking affected implant failure significantly (p = 0.019). Implant-level CSurRs and CSucRs at 10 years were 96.2% and 93.5% (overall), 97.2% and 94.6% (dehiscence), and 90.0% and 87.6% (fenestrations), respectively. Average bone resorption at 5 and 10 years was 1.22 mm and 1.53 mm, respectively. Biological complications occurred in 18 patients (n = 18 implants). Conclusions: Implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations demonstrate good long-term outcomes with overall high success and survival rates and low average marginal bone resorption, despite an inferior outcome in implants with fenestrations and smoking’s negative effect. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8999632/ /pubmed/35407547 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071939 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Araújo Nobre, Miguel
Lopes, Armando
Antunes, Elsa
The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title_full The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title_fullStr The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title_full_unstemmed The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title_short The 10 Year Outcomes of Implants Inserted with Dehiscence or Fenestrations in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Jaws with the All-on-4 Concept
title_sort 10 year outcomes of implants inserted with dehiscence or fenestrations in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous jaws with the all-on-4 concept
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407547
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071939
work_keys_str_mv AT dearaujonobremiguel the10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept
AT lopesarmando the10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept
AT antuneselsa the10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept
AT dearaujonobremiguel 10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept
AT lopesarmando 10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept
AT antuneselsa 10yearoutcomesofimplantsinsertedwithdehiscenceorfenestrationsintherehabilitationofcompletelyedentulousjawswiththeallon4concept