Cargando…

Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol

Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sozzi, Davide, Filippi, Andrea, Canzi, Gabriele, De Ponti, Elena, Bozzetti, Alberto, Novelli, Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060
_version_ 1784685236868612096
author Sozzi, Davide
Filippi, Andrea
Canzi, Gabriele
De Ponti, Elena
Bozzetti, Alberto
Novelli, Giorgio
author_facet Sozzi, Davide
Filippi, Andrea
Canzi, Gabriele
De Ponti, Elena
Bozzetti, Alberto
Novelli, Giorgio
author_sort Sozzi, Davide
collection PubMed
description Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Methods: 21 patients surgically treated for mandibular neoplasm have been included in the analysis. The Brainlab Vector Vision 3.0(®) software for surgical navigation has been used for preoperative surgical planning and intra-operative navigation. A post-operative accuracy evaluation has been performed matching the position of mandibular landmarks between pre-operative and post-operative CT scans. Results: the maximal discrepancy observed was included between −3.4 mm and +3.2 mm, assuming negative values for under correction and positive values for overcorrection. An average grade of accuracy included between 0.06 ± 0.58 mm and 0.43 ± 0.68 mm has been observed for every mandibular landmark examined, except for mandibular angles that showed a mean discrepancy value included between 1.36 ± 1.73 mm and 1.46 ± 1.02 mm when compared to preoperative measurements. Conclusion: a satisfying level of accuracy has been observed in the protocol presented, which appears to be more versatile if compared to closed custom-made systems. The technique described may represent a valid option for selected patients, but it cannot be considered for routine activity because of the complexity of the method, the mobility of the jaw, the necessity of surgical navigator and the long surgical learning curve that is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8999643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89996432022-04-12 Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol Sozzi, Davide Filippi, Andrea Canzi, Gabriele De Ponti, Elena Bozzetti, Alberto Novelli, Giorgio J Clin Med Article Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Methods: 21 patients surgically treated for mandibular neoplasm have been included in the analysis. The Brainlab Vector Vision 3.0(®) software for surgical navigation has been used for preoperative surgical planning and intra-operative navigation. A post-operative accuracy evaluation has been performed matching the position of mandibular landmarks between pre-operative and post-operative CT scans. Results: the maximal discrepancy observed was included between −3.4 mm and +3.2 mm, assuming negative values for under correction and positive values for overcorrection. An average grade of accuracy included between 0.06 ± 0.58 mm and 0.43 ± 0.68 mm has been observed for every mandibular landmark examined, except for mandibular angles that showed a mean discrepancy value included between 1.36 ± 1.73 mm and 1.46 ± 1.02 mm when compared to preoperative measurements. Conclusion: a satisfying level of accuracy has been observed in the protocol presented, which appears to be more versatile if compared to closed custom-made systems. The technique described may represent a valid option for selected patients, but it cannot be considered for routine activity because of the complexity of the method, the mobility of the jaw, the necessity of surgical navigator and the long surgical learning curve that is required. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8999643/ /pubmed/35407667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sozzi, Davide
Filippi, Andrea
Canzi, Gabriele
De Ponti, Elena
Bozzetti, Alberto
Novelli, Giorgio
Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title_full Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title_fullStr Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title_short Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
title_sort surgical navigation in mandibular reconstruction: accuracy evaluation of an innovative protocol
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060
work_keys_str_mv AT sozzidavide surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol
AT filippiandrea surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol
AT canzigabriele surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol
AT depontielena surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol
AT bozzettialberto surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol
AT novelligiorgio surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol