Cargando…
Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol
Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Metho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060 |
_version_ | 1784685236868612096 |
---|---|
author | Sozzi, Davide Filippi, Andrea Canzi, Gabriele De Ponti, Elena Bozzetti, Alberto Novelli, Giorgio |
author_facet | Sozzi, Davide Filippi, Andrea Canzi, Gabriele De Ponti, Elena Bozzetti, Alberto Novelli, Giorgio |
author_sort | Sozzi, Davide |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Methods: 21 patients surgically treated for mandibular neoplasm have been included in the analysis. The Brainlab Vector Vision 3.0(®) software for surgical navigation has been used for preoperative surgical planning and intra-operative navigation. A post-operative accuracy evaluation has been performed matching the position of mandibular landmarks between pre-operative and post-operative CT scans. Results: the maximal discrepancy observed was included between −3.4 mm and +3.2 mm, assuming negative values for under correction and positive values for overcorrection. An average grade of accuracy included between 0.06 ± 0.58 mm and 0.43 ± 0.68 mm has been observed for every mandibular landmark examined, except for mandibular angles that showed a mean discrepancy value included between 1.36 ± 1.73 mm and 1.46 ± 1.02 mm when compared to preoperative measurements. Conclusion: a satisfying level of accuracy has been observed in the protocol presented, which appears to be more versatile if compared to closed custom-made systems. The technique described may represent a valid option for selected patients, but it cannot be considered for routine activity because of the complexity of the method, the mobility of the jaw, the necessity of surgical navigator and the long surgical learning curve that is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8999643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89996432022-04-12 Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol Sozzi, Davide Filippi, Andrea Canzi, Gabriele De Ponti, Elena Bozzetti, Alberto Novelli, Giorgio J Clin Med Article Aim: the purpose of this work is to present an innovative protocol for virtual planning and surgical navigation in post-oncological mandibular reconstruction through fibula free flap. In order to analyze its applicability, an evaluation of accuracy for the surgical protocol has been performed. Methods: 21 patients surgically treated for mandibular neoplasm have been included in the analysis. The Brainlab Vector Vision 3.0(®) software for surgical navigation has been used for preoperative surgical planning and intra-operative navigation. A post-operative accuracy evaluation has been performed matching the position of mandibular landmarks between pre-operative and post-operative CT scans. Results: the maximal discrepancy observed was included between −3.4 mm and +3.2 mm, assuming negative values for under correction and positive values for overcorrection. An average grade of accuracy included between 0.06 ± 0.58 mm and 0.43 ± 0.68 mm has been observed for every mandibular landmark examined, except for mandibular angles that showed a mean discrepancy value included between 1.36 ± 1.73 mm and 1.46 ± 1.02 mm when compared to preoperative measurements. Conclusion: a satisfying level of accuracy has been observed in the protocol presented, which appears to be more versatile if compared to closed custom-made systems. The technique described may represent a valid option for selected patients, but it cannot be considered for routine activity because of the complexity of the method, the mobility of the jaw, the necessity of surgical navigator and the long surgical learning curve that is required. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8999643/ /pubmed/35407667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sozzi, Davide Filippi, Andrea Canzi, Gabriele De Ponti, Elena Bozzetti, Alberto Novelli, Giorgio Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title | Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title_full | Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title_fullStr | Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title_short | Surgical Navigation in Mandibular Reconstruction: Accuracy Evaluation of an Innovative Protocol |
title_sort | surgical navigation in mandibular reconstruction: accuracy evaluation of an innovative protocol |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sozzidavide surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol AT filippiandrea surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol AT canzigabriele surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol AT depontielena surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol AT bozzettialberto surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol AT novelligiorgio surgicalnavigationinmandibularreconstructionaccuracyevaluationofaninnovativeprotocol |