Cargando…
Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons
C-reactive protein (CRP), the prototype human acute phase protein, may be causally involved in various human diseases. As CRP has appeared much earlier in evolution than antibodies and nonetheless partly utilizes the same biological structures, it is likely that CRP has been the first antibody-like...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071771 |
_version_ | 1784685281294680064 |
---|---|
author | Torzewski, Jan Brunner, Patrizia Ries, Wolfgang Garlichs, Christoph D. Kayser, Stefan Heigl, Franz Sheriff, Ahmed |
author_facet | Torzewski, Jan Brunner, Patrizia Ries, Wolfgang Garlichs, Christoph D. Kayser, Stefan Heigl, Franz Sheriff, Ahmed |
author_sort | Torzewski, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | C-reactive protein (CRP), the prototype human acute phase protein, may be causally involved in various human diseases. As CRP has appeared much earlier in evolution than antibodies and nonetheless partly utilizes the same biological structures, it is likely that CRP has been the first antibody-like molecule in the evolution of the immune system. Like antibodies, CRP may cause autoimmune reactions in a variety of human pathologies. Consequently, therapeutic targeting of CRP may be of utmost interest in human medicine. Over the past two decades, however, pharmacological targeting of CRP has turned out to be extremely difficult. Currently, the easiest, most effective and clinically safest method to target CRP in humans may be the specific extracorporeal removal of CRP by selective apheresis. The latter has recently shown promising therapeutic effects, especially in acute myocardial infarction and COVID-19 pneumonia. This review summarizes the pros and cons of applying this novel technology to patients suffering from various diseases, with a focus on its use in cardiovascular medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8999816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89998162022-04-12 Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons Torzewski, Jan Brunner, Patrizia Ries, Wolfgang Garlichs, Christoph D. Kayser, Stefan Heigl, Franz Sheriff, Ahmed J Clin Med Review C-reactive protein (CRP), the prototype human acute phase protein, may be causally involved in various human diseases. As CRP has appeared much earlier in evolution than antibodies and nonetheless partly utilizes the same biological structures, it is likely that CRP has been the first antibody-like molecule in the evolution of the immune system. Like antibodies, CRP may cause autoimmune reactions in a variety of human pathologies. Consequently, therapeutic targeting of CRP may be of utmost interest in human medicine. Over the past two decades, however, pharmacological targeting of CRP has turned out to be extremely difficult. Currently, the easiest, most effective and clinically safest method to target CRP in humans may be the specific extracorporeal removal of CRP by selective apheresis. The latter has recently shown promising therapeutic effects, especially in acute myocardial infarction and COVID-19 pneumonia. This review summarizes the pros and cons of applying this novel technology to patients suffering from various diseases, with a focus on its use in cardiovascular medicine. MDPI 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8999816/ /pubmed/35407379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071771 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Torzewski, Jan Brunner, Patrizia Ries, Wolfgang Garlichs, Christoph D. Kayser, Stefan Heigl, Franz Sheriff, Ahmed Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title | Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title_full | Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title_fullStr | Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title_short | Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons |
title_sort | targeting c-reactive protein by selective apheresis in humans: pros and cons |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8999816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071771 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torzewskijan targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT brunnerpatrizia targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT rieswolfgang targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT garlichschristophd targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT kayserstefan targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT heiglfranz targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons AT sheriffahmed targetingcreactiveproteinbyselectiveapheresisinhumansprosandcons |