Cargando…

Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys

As it is known, beryllium bronze, an important copper alloy, is widely used in the field of aerospace. Since the performance of domestic and imported beryllium bronze alloys have obvious differences, domestic beryllium bronze QBe2.0 and imported C17200 alloy were adopted, and the hardness and tensil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zheng, Li, Jiang, Zhang, Yi, Lv, Chuanming, Li, Ting, Zhang, Jiaqi, Hui, Songxiao, Peng, Lijun, Huang, Guojie, Xie, Haofeng, Mi, Xujun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072570
_version_ 1784685332795490304
author Wang, Zheng
Li, Jiang
Zhang, Yi
Lv, Chuanming
Li, Ting
Zhang, Jiaqi
Hui, Songxiao
Peng, Lijun
Huang, Guojie
Xie, Haofeng
Mi, Xujun
author_facet Wang, Zheng
Li, Jiang
Zhang, Yi
Lv, Chuanming
Li, Ting
Zhang, Jiaqi
Hui, Songxiao
Peng, Lijun
Huang, Guojie
Xie, Haofeng
Mi, Xujun
author_sort Wang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description As it is known, beryllium bronze, an important copper alloy, is widely used in the field of aerospace. Since the performance of domestic and imported beryllium bronze alloys have obvious differences, domestic beryllium bronze QBe2.0 and imported C17200 alloy were adopted, and the hardness and tensile properties of imported and domestic beryllium bronze alloys in the peak aging state were compared and analyzed. In addition, the microstructure morphologies of the C17200 alloy and QBe2.0 alloy were analyzed by SEM, EBSD, and TEM. This study adopted a data-driven exploration approach to elaborate the differences between C17200 and QBe2.0 alloy. After aging at 300 °C for 2 h (peak aging), the tensile strengths of the C17200 alloy and QBe2.0 alloy were 1357 MPa and 1309 MPa, the yield strengths were 1195 MPa and 1188 MPa, and the elongations were 5.5% and 4.0%, respectively. In the peak-aged state, the grain size, uniformity, small angle grain boundary, and twin density of the C17200 alloy were much better than those of the QBe2.0 alloy, which led to more significant grain refinement and twin strengthening effects. A large amount of γ’ phase, γ phase, and β phase were precipitated in both alloys, but the precipitation density of the γ’ strengthening phase in the C17200 alloy was much greater than that of the QBe2.0 alloy. The C17200 alloy exhibited better mechanical properties under the combined effects of the various strengthening mechanisms, which provided a guideline for the subsequent improvement of domestic alloys and laid a solid foundation for the development of new copper alloys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9000027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90000272022-04-12 Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys Wang, Zheng Li, Jiang Zhang, Yi Lv, Chuanming Li, Ting Zhang, Jiaqi Hui, Songxiao Peng, Lijun Huang, Guojie Xie, Haofeng Mi, Xujun Materials (Basel) Article As it is known, beryllium bronze, an important copper alloy, is widely used in the field of aerospace. Since the performance of domestic and imported beryllium bronze alloys have obvious differences, domestic beryllium bronze QBe2.0 and imported C17200 alloy were adopted, and the hardness and tensile properties of imported and domestic beryllium bronze alloys in the peak aging state were compared and analyzed. In addition, the microstructure morphologies of the C17200 alloy and QBe2.0 alloy were analyzed by SEM, EBSD, and TEM. This study adopted a data-driven exploration approach to elaborate the differences between C17200 and QBe2.0 alloy. After aging at 300 °C for 2 h (peak aging), the tensile strengths of the C17200 alloy and QBe2.0 alloy were 1357 MPa and 1309 MPa, the yield strengths were 1195 MPa and 1188 MPa, and the elongations were 5.5% and 4.0%, respectively. In the peak-aged state, the grain size, uniformity, small angle grain boundary, and twin density of the C17200 alloy were much better than those of the QBe2.0 alloy, which led to more significant grain refinement and twin strengthening effects. A large amount of γ’ phase, γ phase, and β phase were precipitated in both alloys, but the precipitation density of the γ’ strengthening phase in the C17200 alloy was much greater than that of the QBe2.0 alloy. The C17200 alloy exhibited better mechanical properties under the combined effects of the various strengthening mechanisms, which provided a guideline for the subsequent improvement of domestic alloys and laid a solid foundation for the development of new copper alloys. MDPI 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9000027/ /pubmed/35407905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072570 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Zheng
Li, Jiang
Zhang, Yi
Lv, Chuanming
Li, Ting
Zhang, Jiaqi
Hui, Songxiao
Peng, Lijun
Huang, Guojie
Xie, Haofeng
Mi, Xujun
Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title_full Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title_fullStr Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title_short Comparison of the Mechanical Properties and Microstructures of QB2.0 and C17200 Alloys
title_sort comparison of the mechanical properties and microstructures of qb2.0 and c17200 alloys
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072570
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzheng comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT lijiang comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT zhangyi comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT lvchuanming comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT liting comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT zhangjiaqi comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT huisongxiao comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT penglijun comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT huangguojie comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT xiehaofeng comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys
AT mixujun comparisonofthemechanicalpropertiesandmicrostructuresofqb20andc17200alloys