Cargando…

How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation

BACKGROUND: Inter-organisational collaborations (IOCs) in healthcare have been viewed as an effective approach to performance improvement. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of what helps IOCs function, as well as how and why contextual elements affect their implementation. A realist re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aunger, Justin Avery, Millar, Ross, Rafferty, Anne Marie, Mannion, Russell, Greenhalgh, Joanne, Faulks, Deborah, McLeod, Hugh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35404938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266899
_version_ 1784685351376257024
author Aunger, Justin Avery
Millar, Ross
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Mannion, Russell
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Faulks, Deborah
McLeod, Hugh
author_facet Aunger, Justin Avery
Millar, Ross
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Mannion, Russell
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Faulks, Deborah
McLeod, Hugh
author_sort Aunger, Justin Avery
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inter-organisational collaborations (IOCs) in healthcare have been viewed as an effective approach to performance improvement. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of what helps IOCs function, as well as how and why contextual elements affect their implementation. A realist review of evidence drawing on 86 sources has sought to elicit and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to understand and refine these phenomena, yet further understanding can be gained from interviewing those involved in developing IOCs. METHODS: We used a realist evaluation methodology, adopting prior realist synthesis findings as a theoretical framework that we sought to refine. We drew on 32 interviews taking place between January 2020 and May 2021 with 29 stakeholders comprising IOC case studies, service users, as well as regulatory perspectives in England. Using a retroductive analysis approach, we aimed to test CMOCs against these data to explore whether previously identified mechanisms, CMOCs, and causal links between them were affirmed, refuted, or revised, and refine our explanations of how and why interorganisational collaborations are successful. RESULTS: Most of our prior CMOCs and their underlying mechanisms were supported in the interview findings with a diverse range of evidence. Leadership behaviours, including showing vulnerability and persuasiveness, acted to shape the core mechanisms of collaborative functioning. These included our prior mechanisms of trust, faith, and confidence, which were largely ratified with minor refinements. Action statements were formulated, translating theoretical findings into practical guidance. CONCLUSION: As the fifth stage in a larger project, our refined theory provides a comprehensive understanding of the causal chain leading to effective collaborative inter-organisational relationships. These findings and recommendations can support implementation of IOCs in the UK and elsewhere. Future research should translate these findings into further practical guidance for implementers, researchers, and policymakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9000100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90001002022-04-12 How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation Aunger, Justin Avery Millar, Ross Rafferty, Anne Marie Mannion, Russell Greenhalgh, Joanne Faulks, Deborah McLeod, Hugh PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Inter-organisational collaborations (IOCs) in healthcare have been viewed as an effective approach to performance improvement. However, there remain gaps in our understanding of what helps IOCs function, as well as how and why contextual elements affect their implementation. A realist review of evidence drawing on 86 sources has sought to elicit and refine context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) to understand and refine these phenomena, yet further understanding can be gained from interviewing those involved in developing IOCs. METHODS: We used a realist evaluation methodology, adopting prior realist synthesis findings as a theoretical framework that we sought to refine. We drew on 32 interviews taking place between January 2020 and May 2021 with 29 stakeholders comprising IOC case studies, service users, as well as regulatory perspectives in England. Using a retroductive analysis approach, we aimed to test CMOCs against these data to explore whether previously identified mechanisms, CMOCs, and causal links between them were affirmed, refuted, or revised, and refine our explanations of how and why interorganisational collaborations are successful. RESULTS: Most of our prior CMOCs and their underlying mechanisms were supported in the interview findings with a diverse range of evidence. Leadership behaviours, including showing vulnerability and persuasiveness, acted to shape the core mechanisms of collaborative functioning. These included our prior mechanisms of trust, faith, and confidence, which were largely ratified with minor refinements. Action statements were formulated, translating theoretical findings into practical guidance. CONCLUSION: As the fifth stage in a larger project, our refined theory provides a comprehensive understanding of the causal chain leading to effective collaborative inter-organisational relationships. These findings and recommendations can support implementation of IOCs in the UK and elsewhere. Future research should translate these findings into further practical guidance for implementers, researchers, and policymakers. Public Library of Science 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9000100/ /pubmed/35404938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266899 Text en © 2022 Aunger et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aunger, Justin Avery
Millar, Ross
Rafferty, Anne Marie
Mannion, Russell
Greenhalgh, Joanne
Faulks, Deborah
McLeod, Hugh
How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title_full How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title_fullStr How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title_full_unstemmed How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title_short How, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? A realist evaluation
title_sort how, when, and why do inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work? a realist evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35404938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266899
work_keys_str_mv AT aungerjustinavery howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT millarross howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT raffertyannemarie howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT mannionrussell howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT greenhalghjoanne howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT faulksdeborah howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation
AT mcleodhugh howwhenandwhydointerorganisationalcollaborationsinhealthcareworkarealistevaluation