Cargando…

Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in two different pathophysiologic scenarios. Background: There are different underlying pathological processes in coronary artery disease. Mid-term safety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sella, Gal, Gandelman, Gera, Teodorovich, Nicholay, Tuvali, Ortal, Ayyad, Omar, Abu Khadija, Haitham, Haberman, Dan, Poles, Lion, Jonas, Michael, Volodarsky, Igor, George, Jacob, Blatt, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071859
_version_ 1784685377643085824
author Sella, Gal
Gandelman, Gera
Teodorovich, Nicholay
Tuvali, Ortal
Ayyad, Omar
Abu Khadija, Haitham
Haberman, Dan
Poles, Lion
Jonas, Michael
Volodarsky, Igor
George, Jacob
Blatt, Alex
author_facet Sella, Gal
Gandelman, Gera
Teodorovich, Nicholay
Tuvali, Ortal
Ayyad, Omar
Abu Khadija, Haitham
Haberman, Dan
Poles, Lion
Jonas, Michael
Volodarsky, Igor
George, Jacob
Blatt, Alex
author_sort Sella, Gal
collection PubMed
description Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in two different pathophysiologic scenarios. Background: There are different underlying pathological processes in coronary artery disease. Mid-term safety and efficacy of DCB approach is still limited. Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing DCB were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 24 months. Results: Between January 2011 and December 2017, 442 patients were included, representing 4.4% of all PCIs in our institution. A total of 460 DCB lesions were treated, of which 328 (71.3%) were de novo and 132 (28.7%) were combined bare metal or drug-eluting stents with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The patients’ mean age was 66.2 ± 11.7 years with a diabetes prevalence of 45.3%. The TLR rate was lower in the de novo group (5.3%) compared to the ISR group (9.4%) (p = 0.04). No differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the de novo group (38.9%) and ISR group (42.5%) (p = 0.47). No significant differences were detected in the TLR occurrence in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: Our extended experience demonstrates that the mid-term DCB approach in these two pathophysiologic settings represent a reasonable option, with low TLR rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9000207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90002072022-04-12 Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease Sella, Gal Gandelman, Gera Teodorovich, Nicholay Tuvali, Ortal Ayyad, Omar Abu Khadija, Haitham Haberman, Dan Poles, Lion Jonas, Michael Volodarsky, Igor George, Jacob Blatt, Alex J Clin Med Article Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCB) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in two different pathophysiologic scenarios. Background: There are different underlying pathological processes in coronary artery disease. Mid-term safety and efficacy of DCB approach is still limited. Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients undergoing DCB were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 24 months. Results: Between January 2011 and December 2017, 442 patients were included, representing 4.4% of all PCIs in our institution. A total of 460 DCB lesions were treated, of which 328 (71.3%) were de novo and 132 (28.7%) were combined bare metal or drug-eluting stents with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The patients’ mean age was 66.2 ± 11.7 years with a diabetes prevalence of 45.3%. The TLR rate was lower in the de novo group (5.3%) compared to the ISR group (9.4%) (p = 0.04). No differences were observed in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between the de novo group (38.9%) and ISR group (42.5%) (p = 0.47). No significant differences were detected in the TLR occurrence in the subgroup analysis. Conclusion: Our extended experience demonstrates that the mid-term DCB approach in these two pathophysiologic settings represent a reasonable option, with low TLR rate. MDPI 2022-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9000207/ /pubmed/35407467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071859 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sella, Gal
Gandelman, Gera
Teodorovich, Nicholay
Tuvali, Ortal
Ayyad, Omar
Abu Khadija, Haitham
Haberman, Dan
Poles, Lion
Jonas, Michael
Volodarsky, Igor
George, Jacob
Blatt, Alex
Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Drug-Coated Balloons in Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort mid-term clinical outcomes following drug-coated balloons in coronary artery disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071859
work_keys_str_mv AT sellagal midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT gandelmangera midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT teodorovichnicholay midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT tuvaliortal midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT ayyadomar midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT abukhadijahaitham midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT habermandan midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT poleslion midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT jonasmichael midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT volodarskyigor midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT georgejacob midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease
AT blattalex midtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingdrugcoatedballoonsincoronaryarterydisease