Cargando…

Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study

(1) Background: Orthodontic appliances have changed and improved with the increasing demand for orthodontic treatment of the general population. Patients desire for shorter orthodontic treatments and for the wearing of more aesthetic devices has led to the technological development of orthodontic br...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana, Bencze, Maria-Angelica, Vasilache, Adriana, Teodorescu, Elina, Albu, Cristina-Crenguța, Popoviciu, Nicoleta Olivia, Ionescu, Ecaterina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072640
_version_ 1784685381776572416
author Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana
Bencze, Maria-Angelica
Vasilache, Adriana
Teodorescu, Elina
Albu, Cristina-Crenguța
Popoviciu, Nicoleta Olivia
Ionescu, Ecaterina
author_facet Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana
Bencze, Maria-Angelica
Vasilache, Adriana
Teodorescu, Elina
Albu, Cristina-Crenguța
Popoviciu, Nicoleta Olivia
Ionescu, Ecaterina
author_sort Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: Orthodontic appliances have changed and improved with the increasing demand for orthodontic treatment of the general population. Patients desire for shorter orthodontic treatments and for the wearing of more aesthetic devices has led to the technological development of orthodontic brackets; these were manufactured from aesthetic materials (ceramics, composite polymers) and presented different designs regarding the way archwires are ligated to the bracket. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were any differences between the static frictional forces generated by stainless steel (metallic) and polycrystalline alumina (ceramics) conventional and self-ligating brackets. (2) Methods: Static friction assessment was carried out in vitro with a universal testing machine, HV-500N-S (Schmidt Control Instruments, Hans Schmidt & Co. GmbH), intended for measuring compression and traction forces. (3) Results: The study revealed significant differences in static frictional forces at the bracket-archwire interface between the tested brackets. Stainless steel brackets produced lower static friction forces than polycrystalline alumina and self-ligating brackets generally produced lower static frictional forces than conventional brackets. The reduction of frictional forces was noticeable in the first stages of treatment, when thin, flexible orthodontic archwires (0.016” NiTi) are used. Engaged with large rectangular stainless steel archwires, (0.019 × 0.025” SS), the frictional forces produced by conventional and self-ligating metal brackets were similar, no significant differences being observed between the two types of metallic design. However, in the case of tested ceramic brackets, the results showed that the self-ligating type allows a reduction in frictional forces even in advanced stages of treatment compared to conventionally ligation. (4) Conclusions: From the perspective of an orthodontic system with low frictional forces, metal brackets are preferable to aesthetic ones, and self-ligating ceramic brackets are preferable to conventional ceramic brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9000226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90002262022-04-12 Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana Bencze, Maria-Angelica Vasilache, Adriana Teodorescu, Elina Albu, Cristina-Crenguța Popoviciu, Nicoleta Olivia Ionescu, Ecaterina Materials (Basel) Article (1) Background: Orthodontic appliances have changed and improved with the increasing demand for orthodontic treatment of the general population. Patients desire for shorter orthodontic treatments and for the wearing of more aesthetic devices has led to the technological development of orthodontic brackets; these were manufactured from aesthetic materials (ceramics, composite polymers) and presented different designs regarding the way archwires are ligated to the bracket. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were any differences between the static frictional forces generated by stainless steel (metallic) and polycrystalline alumina (ceramics) conventional and self-ligating brackets. (2) Methods: Static friction assessment was carried out in vitro with a universal testing machine, HV-500N-S (Schmidt Control Instruments, Hans Schmidt & Co. GmbH), intended for measuring compression and traction forces. (3) Results: The study revealed significant differences in static frictional forces at the bracket-archwire interface between the tested brackets. Stainless steel brackets produced lower static friction forces than polycrystalline alumina and self-ligating brackets generally produced lower static frictional forces than conventional brackets. The reduction of frictional forces was noticeable in the first stages of treatment, when thin, flexible orthodontic archwires (0.016” NiTi) are used. Engaged with large rectangular stainless steel archwires, (0.019 × 0.025” SS), the frictional forces produced by conventional and self-ligating metal brackets were similar, no significant differences being observed between the two types of metallic design. However, in the case of tested ceramic brackets, the results showed that the self-ligating type allows a reduction in frictional forces even in advanced stages of treatment compared to conventionally ligation. (4) Conclusions: From the perspective of an orthodontic system with low frictional forces, metal brackets are preferable to aesthetic ones, and self-ligating ceramic brackets are preferable to conventional ceramic brackets. MDPI 2022-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9000226/ /pubmed/35407973 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072640 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dragomirescu, Anca-Oana
Bencze, Maria-Angelica
Vasilache, Adriana
Teodorescu, Elina
Albu, Cristina-Crenguța
Popoviciu, Nicoleta Olivia
Ionescu, Ecaterina
Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_full Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_fullStr Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_short Reducing Friction in Orthodontic Brackets: A Matter of Material or Type of Ligation Selection? In-Vitro Comparative Study
title_sort reducing friction in orthodontic brackets: a matter of material or type of ligation selection? in-vitro comparative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407973
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15072640
work_keys_str_mv AT dragomirescuancaoana reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT benczemariaangelica reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT vasilacheadriana reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT teodorescuelina reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT albucristinacrenguta reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT popoviciunicoletaolivia reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy
AT ionescuecaterina reducingfrictioninorthodonticbracketsamatterofmaterialortypeofligationselectioninvitrocomparativestudy