Cargando…

Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanaka, Manabu, Izumiya, Makoto, Haniu, Hisao, Ueda, Katsuya, Ma, Chuang, Ueshiba, Koki, Ideta, Hirokazu, Sobajima, Atsushi, Uchiyama, Shigeharu, Takahashi, Jun, Saito, Naoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195
_version_ 1784685487958523904
author Tanaka, Manabu
Izumiya, Makoto
Haniu, Hisao
Ueda, Katsuya
Ma, Chuang
Ueshiba, Koki
Ideta, Hirokazu
Sobajima, Atsushi
Uchiyama, Shigeharu
Takahashi, Jun
Saito, Naoto
author_facet Tanaka, Manabu
Izumiya, Makoto
Haniu, Hisao
Ueda, Katsuya
Ma, Chuang
Ueshiba, Koki
Ideta, Hirokazu
Sobajima, Atsushi
Uchiyama, Shigeharu
Takahashi, Jun
Saito, Naoto
author_sort Tanaka, Manabu
collection PubMed
description Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone regeneration materials. In vivo, such materials are commonly tested in animal bone defect models to assess their bone regeneration potential. From an ethical standpoint, however, animal experiments should be minimized. A standardized in vitro strategy for this purpose is desirable, but at present, the results of studies conducted under a wide variety of conditions have all been evaluated equally. This review will first briefly introduce several bone regeneration reports on nanomaterials and the nanosize-derived caveats of evaluations in such studies. Then, experimental techniques (in vivo and in vitro), types of cells, culture media, fetal bovine serum, and additives will be described, with specific examples of the risks of various culture conditions leading to erroneous conclusions in biomaterial analysis. We hope that this review will create a better understanding of the evaluation of biomaterials, including nanomaterials for bone regeneration, and lead to the development of versatile assessment methods that can be widely used in biomaterial development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9000656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90006562022-04-12 Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration Tanaka, Manabu Izumiya, Makoto Haniu, Hisao Ueda, Katsuya Ma, Chuang Ueshiba, Koki Ideta, Hirokazu Sobajima, Atsushi Uchiyama, Shigeharu Takahashi, Jun Saito, Naoto Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone regeneration materials. In vivo, such materials are commonly tested in animal bone defect models to assess their bone regeneration potential. From an ethical standpoint, however, animal experiments should be minimized. A standardized in vitro strategy for this purpose is desirable, but at present, the results of studies conducted under a wide variety of conditions have all been evaluated equally. This review will first briefly introduce several bone regeneration reports on nanomaterials and the nanosize-derived caveats of evaluations in such studies. Then, experimental techniques (in vivo and in vitro), types of cells, culture media, fetal bovine serum, and additives will be described, with specific examples of the risks of various culture conditions leading to erroneous conclusions in biomaterial analysis. We hope that this review will create a better understanding of the evaluation of biomaterials, including nanomaterials for bone regeneration, and lead to the development of versatile assessment methods that can be widely used in biomaterial development. MDPI 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9000656/ /pubmed/35407313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tanaka, Manabu
Izumiya, Makoto
Haniu, Hisao
Ueda, Katsuya
Ma, Chuang
Ueshiba, Koki
Ideta, Hirokazu
Sobajima, Atsushi
Uchiyama, Shigeharu
Takahashi, Jun
Saito, Naoto
Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title_full Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title_fullStr Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title_short Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
title_sort current methods in the study of nanomaterials for bone regeneration
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195
work_keys_str_mv AT tanakamanabu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT izumiyamakoto currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT haniuhisao currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT uedakatsuya currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT machuang currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT ueshibakoki currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT idetahirokazu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT sobajimaatsushi currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT uchiyamashigeharu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT takahashijun currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration
AT saitonaoto currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration