Cargando…
Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195 |
_version_ | 1784685487958523904 |
---|---|
author | Tanaka, Manabu Izumiya, Makoto Haniu, Hisao Ueda, Katsuya Ma, Chuang Ueshiba, Koki Ideta, Hirokazu Sobajima, Atsushi Uchiyama, Shigeharu Takahashi, Jun Saito, Naoto |
author_facet | Tanaka, Manabu Izumiya, Makoto Haniu, Hisao Ueda, Katsuya Ma, Chuang Ueshiba, Koki Ideta, Hirokazu Sobajima, Atsushi Uchiyama, Shigeharu Takahashi, Jun Saito, Naoto |
author_sort | Tanaka, Manabu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone regeneration materials. In vivo, such materials are commonly tested in animal bone defect models to assess their bone regeneration potential. From an ethical standpoint, however, animal experiments should be minimized. A standardized in vitro strategy for this purpose is desirable, but at present, the results of studies conducted under a wide variety of conditions have all been evaluated equally. This review will first briefly introduce several bone regeneration reports on nanomaterials and the nanosize-derived caveats of evaluations in such studies. Then, experimental techniques (in vivo and in vitro), types of cells, culture media, fetal bovine serum, and additives will be described, with specific examples of the risks of various culture conditions leading to erroneous conclusions in biomaterial analysis. We hope that this review will create a better understanding of the evaluation of biomaterials, including nanomaterials for bone regeneration, and lead to the development of versatile assessment methods that can be widely used in biomaterial development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9000656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90006562022-04-12 Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration Tanaka, Manabu Izumiya, Makoto Haniu, Hisao Ueda, Katsuya Ma, Chuang Ueshiba, Koki Ideta, Hirokazu Sobajima, Atsushi Uchiyama, Shigeharu Takahashi, Jun Saito, Naoto Nanomaterials (Basel) Review Nanomaterials show great promise as bone regeneration materials. They can be used as fillers to strengthen bone regeneration scaffolds, or employed in their natural form as carriers for drug delivery systems. A variety of experiments have been conducted to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone regeneration materials. In vivo, such materials are commonly tested in animal bone defect models to assess their bone regeneration potential. From an ethical standpoint, however, animal experiments should be minimized. A standardized in vitro strategy for this purpose is desirable, but at present, the results of studies conducted under a wide variety of conditions have all been evaluated equally. This review will first briefly introduce several bone regeneration reports on nanomaterials and the nanosize-derived caveats of evaluations in such studies. Then, experimental techniques (in vivo and in vitro), types of cells, culture media, fetal bovine serum, and additives will be described, with specific examples of the risks of various culture conditions leading to erroneous conclusions in biomaterial analysis. We hope that this review will create a better understanding of the evaluation of biomaterials, including nanomaterials for bone regeneration, and lead to the development of versatile assessment methods that can be widely used in biomaterial development. MDPI 2022-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9000656/ /pubmed/35407313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Tanaka, Manabu Izumiya, Makoto Haniu, Hisao Ueda, Katsuya Ma, Chuang Ueshiba, Koki Ideta, Hirokazu Sobajima, Atsushi Uchiyama, Shigeharu Takahashi, Jun Saito, Naoto Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title | Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title_full | Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title_fullStr | Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title_short | Current Methods in the Study of Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration |
title_sort | current methods in the study of nanomaterials for bone regeneration |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9000656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12071195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanakamanabu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT izumiyamakoto currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT haniuhisao currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT uedakatsuya currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT machuang currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT ueshibakoki currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT idetahirokazu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT sobajimaatsushi currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT uchiyamashigeharu currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT takahashijun currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration AT saitonaoto currentmethodsinthestudyofnanomaterialsforboneregeneration |