Cargando…

Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study

BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myrseth, Elisabeth, Nymo, Linn Såve, Gjessing, Petter Fosse, Kørner, Hartwig, Kvaløy, Jan Terje, Norderval, Stig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x
_version_ 1784685619106021376
author Myrseth, Elisabeth
Nymo, Linn Såve
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Kørner, Hartwig
Kvaløy, Jan Terje
Norderval, Stig
author_facet Myrseth, Elisabeth
Nymo, Linn Såve
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Kørner, Hartwig
Kvaløy, Jan Terje
Norderval, Stig
author_sort Myrseth, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A national 5-year cohort study utilizing prospectively recorded data on patients who underwent elective major laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery and from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary end point was conversion rate. Secondary end points were postoperative complications within 30 days and histopathological results. Chi-square test, two-sided T test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for univariable analyses. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relations between different predictors and outcomes, and propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment assignment bias. RESULTS: A total of 1284 patients were included, of whom 375 underwent RR and 909 LR. Conversion rate was 8 out of 375 (2.1%) for RR compared with 87 out of 909 (9.6%) for LR (p < 0.001). RR was associated with reduced risk for conversion compared with LR (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.46). There were no other outcome differences between RR and LR. Factors associated with increased risk for conversion were male gender, severe cardiac disease and BMI > 30. Conversion was associated with higher rates of major complications (20 out of 95 (21.2%) vs 135 out of 1189 (11.4%) p = 0.005), reoperations (13 out of 95 (13.7%) vs 93 out of 1189 (7.1%) p = 0.020), and longer hospital stay (median 8 days vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Conversion rate was lower with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy. Conversions were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9001201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90012012022-04-27 Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study Myrseth, Elisabeth Nymo, Linn Såve Gjessing, Petter Fosse Kørner, Hartwig Kvaløy, Jan Terje Norderval, Stig Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A national 5-year cohort study utilizing prospectively recorded data on patients who underwent elective major laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery and from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary end point was conversion rate. Secondary end points were postoperative complications within 30 days and histopathological results. Chi-square test, two-sided T test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for univariable analyses. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relations between different predictors and outcomes, and propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment assignment bias. RESULTS: A total of 1284 patients were included, of whom 375 underwent RR and 909 LR. Conversion rate was 8 out of 375 (2.1%) for RR compared with 87 out of 909 (9.6%) for LR (p < 0.001). RR was associated with reduced risk for conversion compared with LR (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.46). There were no other outcome differences between RR and LR. Factors associated with increased risk for conversion were male gender, severe cardiac disease and BMI > 30. Conversion was associated with higher rates of major complications (20 out of 95 (21.2%) vs 135 out of 1189 (11.4%) p = 0.005), reoperations (13 out of 95 (13.7%) vs 93 out of 1189 (7.1%) p = 0.020), and longer hospital stay (median 8 days vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Conversion rate was lower with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy. Conversions were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Springer US 2021-08-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9001201/ /pubmed/34406469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Myrseth, Elisabeth
Nymo, Linn Såve
Gjessing, Petter Fosse
Kørner, Hartwig
Kvaløy, Jan Terje
Norderval, Stig
Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title_full Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title_fullStr Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title_short Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
title_sort lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x
work_keys_str_mv AT myrsethelisabeth lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy
AT nymolinnsave lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy
AT gjessingpetterfosse lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy
AT kørnerhartwig lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy
AT kvaløyjanterje lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy
AT nordervalstig lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy