Cargando…
Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x |
_version_ | 1784685619106021376 |
---|---|
author | Myrseth, Elisabeth Nymo, Linn Såve Gjessing, Petter Fosse Kørner, Hartwig Kvaløy, Jan Terje Norderval, Stig |
author_facet | Myrseth, Elisabeth Nymo, Linn Såve Gjessing, Petter Fosse Kørner, Hartwig Kvaløy, Jan Terje Norderval, Stig |
author_sort | Myrseth, Elisabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A national 5-year cohort study utilizing prospectively recorded data on patients who underwent elective major laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery and from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary end point was conversion rate. Secondary end points were postoperative complications within 30 days and histopathological results. Chi-square test, two-sided T test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for univariable analyses. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relations between different predictors and outcomes, and propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment assignment bias. RESULTS: A total of 1284 patients were included, of whom 375 underwent RR and 909 LR. Conversion rate was 8 out of 375 (2.1%) for RR compared with 87 out of 909 (9.6%) for LR (p < 0.001). RR was associated with reduced risk for conversion compared with LR (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.46). There were no other outcome differences between RR and LR. Factors associated with increased risk for conversion were male gender, severe cardiac disease and BMI > 30. Conversion was associated with higher rates of major complications (20 out of 95 (21.2%) vs 135 out of 1189 (11.4%) p = 0.005), reoperations (13 out of 95 (13.7%) vs 93 out of 1189 (7.1%) p = 0.020), and longer hospital stay (median 8 days vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Conversion rate was lower with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy. Conversions were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9001201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90012012022-04-27 Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study Myrseth, Elisabeth Nymo, Linn Såve Gjessing, Petter Fosse Kørner, Hartwig Kvaløy, Jan Terje Norderval, Stig Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). METHODS: A national 5-year cohort study utilizing prospectively recorded data on patients who underwent elective major laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery and from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary end point was conversion rate. Secondary end points were postoperative complications within 30 days and histopathological results. Chi-square test, two-sided T test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for univariable analyses. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relations between different predictors and outcomes, and propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment assignment bias. RESULTS: A total of 1284 patients were included, of whom 375 underwent RR and 909 LR. Conversion rate was 8 out of 375 (2.1%) for RR compared with 87 out of 909 (9.6%) for LR (p < 0.001). RR was associated with reduced risk for conversion compared with LR (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.46). There were no other outcome differences between RR and LR. Factors associated with increased risk for conversion were male gender, severe cardiac disease and BMI > 30. Conversion was associated with higher rates of major complications (20 out of 95 (21.2%) vs 135 out of 1189 (11.4%) p = 0.005), reoperations (13 out of 95 (13.7%) vs 93 out of 1189 (7.1%) p = 0.020), and longer hospital stay (median 8 days vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Conversion rate was lower with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy. Conversions were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Springer US 2021-08-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9001201/ /pubmed/34406469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Myrseth, Elisabeth Nymo, Linn Såve Gjessing, Petter Fosse Kørner, Hartwig Kvaløy, Jan Terje Norderval, Stig Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title | Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title_full | Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title_fullStr | Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title_short | Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
title_sort | lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34406469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myrsethelisabeth lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy AT nymolinnsave lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy AT gjessingpetterfosse lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy AT kørnerhartwig lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy AT kvaløyjanterje lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy AT nordervalstig lowerconversionratewithroboticassistedrectalresectionscomparedwithconventionallaparoscopyanationalcohortstudy |