Cargando…
Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study
BACKGROUND: To enhance effective prevention programs after myocardial infarction (MI), the study examined the effects and feasibility of mobile biofeedback training on heart rate variability (HRV-BF). METHODS: Forty-six outpatients aged 41 to 79 years with a documented MI were randomized to HRV-BF v...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10000-6 |
_version_ | 1784685628887138304 |
---|---|
author | Limmer, Anja Laser, Martin Schütz, Astrid |
author_facet | Limmer, Anja Laser, Martin Schütz, Astrid |
author_sort | Limmer, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To enhance effective prevention programs after myocardial infarction (MI), the study examined the effects and feasibility of mobile biofeedback training on heart rate variability (HRV-BF). METHODS: Forty-six outpatients aged 41 to 79 years with a documented MI were randomized to HRV-BF versus usual care. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed to test improvements in measures of short- and long-time HRV, namely, the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and well-being after 12 weeks of HRV-BF. RESULTS: There were intervention effects for short-time HRV (d > 0.4, p < 0.04), which were partly replicated in the GEE models that accounted for control variables: In the HRV-BF group, the high-frequency HRV (group × time interaction: β = 0.59, p = 0.04) compensated for significantly lower baseline levels than the group with usual care. In an optimal dose sample (on average two HRV-BF sessions a day), SDNN significantly increased after HRV-BF (p = 0.002) but not in the waitlist control group. Compensatory trends of HRV-BF were also found for high-frequency HRV and self-efficacy. No adverse effects of the intervention were found but neither were effects on long-time HRV measures. CONCLUSION: The results showed the feasibility of self-guided HRV-BF for almost all post-MI patients. HRV-BF as an adjunctive behavioral treatment increased HRV, which is an indicator of lower cardiovascular risk, and self-efficacy, which suggests heightened psychological resilience. These benefits warrant confirmation and tests of sustainability in larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has not been registered due to its starting point in 2017 predating the publication of the applicable CONSORT extension for reporting social and psychological intervention trials in 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10000-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9001243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90012432022-04-27 Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study Limmer, Anja Laser, Martin Schütz, Astrid Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: To enhance effective prevention programs after myocardial infarction (MI), the study examined the effects and feasibility of mobile biofeedback training on heart rate variability (HRV-BF). METHODS: Forty-six outpatients aged 41 to 79 years with a documented MI were randomized to HRV-BF versus usual care. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed to test improvements in measures of short- and long-time HRV, namely, the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and well-being after 12 weeks of HRV-BF. RESULTS: There were intervention effects for short-time HRV (d > 0.4, p < 0.04), which were partly replicated in the GEE models that accounted for control variables: In the HRV-BF group, the high-frequency HRV (group × time interaction: β = 0.59, p = 0.04) compensated for significantly lower baseline levels than the group with usual care. In an optimal dose sample (on average two HRV-BF sessions a day), SDNN significantly increased after HRV-BF (p = 0.002) but not in the waitlist control group. Compensatory trends of HRV-BF were also found for high-frequency HRV and self-efficacy. No adverse effects of the intervention were found but neither were effects on long-time HRV measures. CONCLUSION: The results showed the feasibility of self-guided HRV-BF for almost all post-MI patients. HRV-BF as an adjunctive behavioral treatment increased HRV, which is an indicator of lower cardiovascular risk, and self-efficacy, which suggests heightened psychological resilience. These benefits warrant confirmation and tests of sustainability in larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has not been registered due to its starting point in 2017 predating the publication of the applicable CONSORT extension for reporting social and psychological intervention trials in 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10000-6. Springer US 2021-05-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9001243/ /pubmed/34008159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10000-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Full Length Manuscript Limmer, Anja Laser, Martin Schütz, Astrid Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title | Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full | Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short | Mobile Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Complementary Intervention After Myocardial Infarction: a Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort | mobile heart rate variability biofeedback as a complementary intervention after myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled study |
topic | Full Length Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34008159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10000-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limmeranja mobileheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackasacomplementaryinterventionaftermyocardialinfarctionarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT lasermartin mobileheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackasacomplementaryinterventionaftermyocardialinfarctionarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT schutzastrid mobileheartratevariabilitybiofeedbackasacomplementaryinterventionaftermyocardialinfarctionarandomizedcontrolledstudy |