Cargando…

Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND: A difficulty score for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is lacking in the literature. A retrospective cohort study was designed to develop a preoperative “difficulty score” for LA. METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted involving four Italian tertiary centers for adrenal disease. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberici, Laura, Paganini, Alessandro M., Ricci, Claudio, Balla, Andrea, Ballarini, Zeno, Ortenzi, Monica, Casole, Giovanni, Quaresima, Silvia, Di Dalmazi, Guido, Ursi, Pietro, Alfano, Marie Sophie, Selva, Saverio, Casadei, Riccardo, Ingaldi, Carlo, Lezoche, Giovanni, Guerrieri, Mario, Minni, Francesco, Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08678-6
_version_ 1784685698079522816
author Alberici, Laura
Paganini, Alessandro M.
Ricci, Claudio
Balla, Andrea
Ballarini, Zeno
Ortenzi, Monica
Casole, Giovanni
Quaresima, Silvia
Di Dalmazi, Guido
Ursi, Pietro
Alfano, Marie Sophie
Selva, Saverio
Casadei, Riccardo
Ingaldi, Carlo
Lezoche, Giovanni
Guerrieri, Mario
Minni, Francesco
Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo
author_facet Alberici, Laura
Paganini, Alessandro M.
Ricci, Claudio
Balla, Andrea
Ballarini, Zeno
Ortenzi, Monica
Casole, Giovanni
Quaresima, Silvia
Di Dalmazi, Guido
Ursi, Pietro
Alfano, Marie Sophie
Selva, Saverio
Casadei, Riccardo
Ingaldi, Carlo
Lezoche, Giovanni
Guerrieri, Mario
Minni, Francesco
Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo
author_sort Alberici, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A difficulty score for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is lacking in the literature. A retrospective cohort study was designed to develop a preoperative “difficulty score” for LA. METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted involving four Italian tertiary centers for adrenal disease. The population was randomly divided into two subsets: training group and validation one. A multicenter study was undertaken, including 964 patients. Patient, adrenal lesion, surgeon’s characteristics, and the type of procedure were studied as potential predictors of target events. The operative time (pOT), conversion rate (cLA), or both were used as indicators of the difficulty in three multivariate models. All models were developed in a training cohort (70% of the sample) and validated using 30% of patients. For all models, the ability to predict complicated postoperative course was reported describing the area under the curve (AUCs). Logistic regression, reporting odds ratio (OR) with p-value, was used. RESULTS: In model A, gender (OR 2.04, p = 0.001), BMI (OR 1.07, p = 0.002), previous surgery (OR 1.29, p = 0.048), site (OR 21.8, p < 0.001) and size of the lesion (OR 1.16, p = 0.002), cumulative sum of procedures (OR 0.99, p < 0.001), extended (OR 26.72, p < 0.001) or associated procedures (OR 4.32, p = 0.015) increased the pOT. In model B, ASA (OR 2.86, p = 0.001), lesion size (OR 1.20, p = 0.005), and extended resection (OR 8.85, p = 0.007) increased the cLA risk. Model C had similar results to model A. All scores obtained predicted the target events in validation cohort (OR 1.99, p < 0.001; OR 1.37, p = 0.007; OR 1.70, p < 0.001, score A, B, and C, respectively). The AUCs in predicting complications were 0.740, 0.686, and 0.763 for model A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSION: A difficulty score based on both pOT and cLA (Model C) was developed using 70% of the sample. The score was validated using a second cohort. Finally, the score was tested, and its results are able to predict a complicated postoperative course. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08678-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9001553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90015532022-04-27 Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study Alberici, Laura Paganini, Alessandro M. Ricci, Claudio Balla, Andrea Ballarini, Zeno Ortenzi, Monica Casole, Giovanni Quaresima, Silvia Di Dalmazi, Guido Ursi, Pietro Alfano, Marie Sophie Selva, Saverio Casadei, Riccardo Ingaldi, Carlo Lezoche, Giovanni Guerrieri, Mario Minni, Francesco Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: A difficulty score for laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is lacking in the literature. A retrospective cohort study was designed to develop a preoperative “difficulty score” for LA. METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted involving four Italian tertiary centers for adrenal disease. The population was randomly divided into two subsets: training group and validation one. A multicenter study was undertaken, including 964 patients. Patient, adrenal lesion, surgeon’s characteristics, and the type of procedure were studied as potential predictors of target events. The operative time (pOT), conversion rate (cLA), or both were used as indicators of the difficulty in three multivariate models. All models were developed in a training cohort (70% of the sample) and validated using 30% of patients. For all models, the ability to predict complicated postoperative course was reported describing the area under the curve (AUCs). Logistic regression, reporting odds ratio (OR) with p-value, was used. RESULTS: In model A, gender (OR 2.04, p = 0.001), BMI (OR 1.07, p = 0.002), previous surgery (OR 1.29, p = 0.048), site (OR 21.8, p < 0.001) and size of the lesion (OR 1.16, p = 0.002), cumulative sum of procedures (OR 0.99, p < 0.001), extended (OR 26.72, p < 0.001) or associated procedures (OR 4.32, p = 0.015) increased the pOT. In model B, ASA (OR 2.86, p = 0.001), lesion size (OR 1.20, p = 0.005), and extended resection (OR 8.85, p = 0.007) increased the cLA risk. Model C had similar results to model A. All scores obtained predicted the target events in validation cohort (OR 1.99, p < 0.001; OR 1.37, p = 0.007; OR 1.70, p < 0.001, score A, B, and C, respectively). The AUCs in predicting complications were 0.740, 0.686, and 0.763 for model A, B, and C, respectively. CONCLUSION: A difficulty score based on both pOT and cLA (Model C) was developed using 70% of the sample. The score was validated using a second cohort. Finally, the score was tested, and its results are able to predict a complicated postoperative course. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-021-08678-6. Springer US 2021-08-17 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9001553/ /pubmed/34402981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08678-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Alberici, Laura
Paganini, Alessandro M.
Ricci, Claudio
Balla, Andrea
Ballarini, Zeno
Ortenzi, Monica
Casole, Giovanni
Quaresima, Silvia
Di Dalmazi, Guido
Ursi, Pietro
Alfano, Marie Sophie
Selva, Saverio
Casadei, Riccardo
Ingaldi, Carlo
Lezoche, Giovanni
Guerrieri, Mario
Minni, Francesco
Tiberio, Guido Alberto Massimo
Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title_fullStr Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title_short Development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
title_sort development and validation of a preoperative “difficulty score” for laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy: a multicenter retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34402981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08678-6
work_keys_str_mv AT albericilaura developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT paganinialessandrom developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ricciclaudio developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ballaandrea developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ballarinizeno developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ortenzimonica developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT casolegiovanni developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT quaresimasilvia developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT didalmaziguido developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ursipietro developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT alfanomariesophie developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT selvasaverio developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT casadeiriccardo developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT ingaldicarlo developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT lezochegiovanni developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT guerrierimario developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT minnifrancesco developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT tiberioguidoalbertomassimo developmentandvalidationofapreoperativedifficultyscoreforlaparoscopictransabdominaladrenalectomyamulticenterretrospectivestudy