Cargando…

Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications

Integrating sustainability goals into the selection of suitable soil stabilization techniques is a global trend. Several bio-inspired and bio-mediated soil stabilization techniques have been recently investigated as sustainable alternatives for traditional techniques known for their high carbon foot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alotaibi, Emran, Arab, Mohamed G., Abdallah, Mohamed, Nassif, Nadia, Omar, Maher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09723-7
_version_ 1784685723912241152
author Alotaibi, Emran
Arab, Mohamed G.
Abdallah, Mohamed
Nassif, Nadia
Omar, Maher
author_facet Alotaibi, Emran
Arab, Mohamed G.
Abdallah, Mohamed
Nassif, Nadia
Omar, Maher
author_sort Alotaibi, Emran
collection PubMed
description Integrating sustainability goals into the selection of suitable soil stabilization techniques is a global trend. Several bio-inspired and bio-mediated soil stabilization techniques have been recently investigated as sustainable alternatives for traditional techniques known for their high carbon footprint. Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) is an emerging bio-inspired soil stabilization technology that is based on the hydrolysis of urea to precipitate carbonates that cement sand particles. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was conducted to compare the use of traditional soil stabilization using Portland cement (PC) with bio-cementation via EICP over a range of environmental impacts. The LCA results revealed that EICP soil treatment has nearly 90% less abiotic depletion potential and 3% less global warming potential compared to PC in soil stabilization. In contrast, EICP in soil stabilization has higher acidification and eutrophication potentials compared to PC due to byproducts during the hydrolysis process. The sensitivity analysis of EICP emissions showed that reducing and controlling the EICP process emissions and using waste non-fate milk has resulted in significantly fewer impacts compared to the EICP baseline scenario. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted between EICP, PC, and Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) to study the effect of treated soil compressive strength on the LCA findings. The analysis suggested that EICP is potentially a better environmental option, in terms of its carbon footprint, at lower compressive strength of the treated soils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9001663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90016632022-04-13 Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications Alotaibi, Emran Arab, Mohamed G. Abdallah, Mohamed Nassif, Nadia Omar, Maher Sci Rep Article Integrating sustainability goals into the selection of suitable soil stabilization techniques is a global trend. Several bio-inspired and bio-mediated soil stabilization techniques have been recently investigated as sustainable alternatives for traditional techniques known for their high carbon footprint. Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) is an emerging bio-inspired soil stabilization technology that is based on the hydrolysis of urea to precipitate carbonates that cement sand particles. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was conducted to compare the use of traditional soil stabilization using Portland cement (PC) with bio-cementation via EICP over a range of environmental impacts. The LCA results revealed that EICP soil treatment has nearly 90% less abiotic depletion potential and 3% less global warming potential compared to PC in soil stabilization. In contrast, EICP in soil stabilization has higher acidification and eutrophication potentials compared to PC due to byproducts during the hydrolysis process. The sensitivity analysis of EICP emissions showed that reducing and controlling the EICP process emissions and using waste non-fate milk has resulted in significantly fewer impacts compared to the EICP baseline scenario. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted between EICP, PC, and Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) to study the effect of treated soil compressive strength on the LCA findings. The analysis suggested that EICP is potentially a better environmental option, in terms of its carbon footprint, at lower compressive strength of the treated soils. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9001663/ /pubmed/35411057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09723-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Alotaibi, Emran
Arab, Mohamed G.
Abdallah, Mohamed
Nassif, Nadia
Omar, Maher
Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title_full Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title_fullStr Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title_full_unstemmed Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title_short Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications
title_sort life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (eicp) for soil stabilization applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09723-7
work_keys_str_mv AT alotaibiemran lifecycleassessmentofbiocementedsandsusingenzymeinducedcarbonateprecipitationeicpforsoilstabilizationapplications
AT arabmohamedg lifecycleassessmentofbiocementedsandsusingenzymeinducedcarbonateprecipitationeicpforsoilstabilizationapplications
AT abdallahmohamed lifecycleassessmentofbiocementedsandsusingenzymeinducedcarbonateprecipitationeicpforsoilstabilizationapplications
AT nassifnadia lifecycleassessmentofbiocementedsandsusingenzymeinducedcarbonateprecipitationeicpforsoilstabilizationapplications
AT omarmaher lifecycleassessmentofbiocementedsandsusingenzymeinducedcarbonateprecipitationeicpforsoilstabilizationapplications