Cargando…
rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is still based on behavioral criteria through a lengthy and time-consuming process. Much effort is being made to identify brain imaging biomarkers and develop tools that could facilitate its diagnosis. In particular, using Machine Learning classifiers based o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09821-6 |
_version_ | 1784685736816017408 |
---|---|
author | Santana, Caio Pinheiro de Carvalho, Emerson Assis Rodrigues, Igor Duarte Bastos, Guilherme Sousa de Souza, Adler Diniz de Brito, Lucelmo Lacerda |
author_facet | Santana, Caio Pinheiro de Carvalho, Emerson Assis Rodrigues, Igor Duarte Bastos, Guilherme Sousa de Souza, Adler Diniz de Brito, Lucelmo Lacerda |
author_sort | Santana, Caio Pinheiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is still based on behavioral criteria through a lengthy and time-consuming process. Much effort is being made to identify brain imaging biomarkers and develop tools that could facilitate its diagnosis. In particular, using Machine Learning classifiers based on resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data is promising, but there is an ongoing need for further research on their accuracy and reliability. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence in the literature so far. A bivariate random-effects meta-analytic model was implemented to investigate the sensitivity and specificity across the 55 studies that offered sufficient information for quantitative analysis. Our results indicated overall summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 73.8% and 74.8%, respectively. SVM stood out as the most used classifier, presenting summary estimates above 76%. Studies with bigger samples tended to obtain worse accuracies, except in the subgroup analysis for ANN classifiers. The use of other brain imaging or phenotypic data to complement rs-fMRI information seems promising, achieving higher sensitivities when compared to rs-fMRI data alone (84.7% versus 72.8%). Finally, our analysis showed AUC values between acceptable and excellent. Still, given the many limitations indicated in our study, further well-designed studies are warranted to extend the potential use of those classification algorithms to clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9001715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90017152022-04-13 rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Santana, Caio Pinheiro de Carvalho, Emerson Assis Rodrigues, Igor Duarte Bastos, Guilherme Sousa de Souza, Adler Diniz de Brito, Lucelmo Lacerda Sci Rep Article Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis is still based on behavioral criteria through a lengthy and time-consuming process. Much effort is being made to identify brain imaging biomarkers and develop tools that could facilitate its diagnosis. In particular, using Machine Learning classifiers based on resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data is promising, but there is an ongoing need for further research on their accuracy and reliability. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence in the literature so far. A bivariate random-effects meta-analytic model was implemented to investigate the sensitivity and specificity across the 55 studies that offered sufficient information for quantitative analysis. Our results indicated overall summary sensitivity and specificity estimates of 73.8% and 74.8%, respectively. SVM stood out as the most used classifier, presenting summary estimates above 76%. Studies with bigger samples tended to obtain worse accuracies, except in the subgroup analysis for ANN classifiers. The use of other brain imaging or phenotypic data to complement rs-fMRI information seems promising, achieving higher sensitivities when compared to rs-fMRI data alone (84.7% versus 72.8%). Finally, our analysis showed AUC values between acceptable and excellent. Still, given the many limitations indicated in our study, further well-designed studies are warranted to extend the potential use of those classification algorithms to clinical settings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9001715/ /pubmed/35411059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09821-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Santana, Caio Pinheiro de Carvalho, Emerson Assis Rodrigues, Igor Duarte Bastos, Guilherme Sousa de Souza, Adler Diniz de Brito, Lucelmo Lacerda rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | rs-fmri and machine learning for asd diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35411059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09821-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santanacaiopinheiro rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT decarvalhoemersonassis rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodriguesigorduarte rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bastosguilhermesousa rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT desouzaadlerdiniz rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT debritolucelmolacerda rsfmriandmachinelearningforasddiagnosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |