Cargando…

A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying

Physicians who participate in medical-aid-in-dying (MAID) cannot be easily identified and studied due to cost and anonymity barriers. We developed and empirically tested a novel methodology to identify and survey physicians highly likely to participate in MAID activities. We used a state-level compr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kini, Vinay, Mosley, Bridget, Ressalam, Julie, Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana, Lum, Hillary D., Kessler, Elizabeth R., DeCamp, Matthew, Campbell, Eric G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09971-7
_version_ 1784685744129835008
author Kini, Vinay
Mosley, Bridget
Ressalam, Julie
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
Lum, Hillary D.
Kessler, Elizabeth R.
DeCamp, Matthew
Campbell, Eric G.
author_facet Kini, Vinay
Mosley, Bridget
Ressalam, Julie
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
Lum, Hillary D.
Kessler, Elizabeth R.
DeCamp, Matthew
Campbell, Eric G.
author_sort Kini, Vinay
collection PubMed
description Physicians who participate in medical-aid-in-dying (MAID) cannot be easily identified and studied due to cost and anonymity barriers. We developed and empirically tested a novel methodology to identify and survey physicians highly likely to participate in MAID activities. We used a state-level comprehensive administrative claims database to identify a cohort of patients with diagnoses and hospice enrollment similar to those known to have filled a prescription for MAID from 2017–2018. We then identified physicians who provided routine outpatient care to these patients using National Provider Identifier numbers. We surveyed these physicians in 3 waves (n = 583 total surveys), ranking physicians in order of their likelihood of being asked about MAID for each wave based on characteristics including specialty and the number of unique patients they had provided care to. We re-ranked physicians in waves 2 and 3 based on responses from prior waves. Physicians were surveyed only once and there was no follow-up to preserve anonymity. Surveys assessed the proportion of respondents who participated in MAID activities (discussions, referrals, and/or prescriptions). We identified 6369 physicians that provided care to 2960 patients. In survey waves one, two, and three respectively, response rates (55%, 52%, and 55%; p = 0.98) and the proportion of respondents that participated in MAID activities (58%, 56%, and 42%; p = 0.05) were similar. Small adjustments made to physician ranking criteria in waves two and three did not increase the proportion of physicians that participated in MAID activities. We used a novel methodology using administrative data to identify and survey physicians at high likelihood of participating in MAID activities. We achieved good overall response rates (52%), and a high proportion of respondents that participated in MAID activities (52%), demonstrating that it is possible to overcome cost and anonymity barriers to conducting quantitative research on MAID. This methodology could be used in larger scale studies of MAID or other bioethical issues with “hidden” physician populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9001750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90017502022-04-13 A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying Kini, Vinay Mosley, Bridget Ressalam, Julie Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana Lum, Hillary D. Kessler, Elizabeth R. DeCamp, Matthew Campbell, Eric G. Sci Rep Article Physicians who participate in medical-aid-in-dying (MAID) cannot be easily identified and studied due to cost and anonymity barriers. We developed and empirically tested a novel methodology to identify and survey physicians highly likely to participate in MAID activities. We used a state-level comprehensive administrative claims database to identify a cohort of patients with diagnoses and hospice enrollment similar to those known to have filled a prescription for MAID from 2017–2018. We then identified physicians who provided routine outpatient care to these patients using National Provider Identifier numbers. We surveyed these physicians in 3 waves (n = 583 total surveys), ranking physicians in order of their likelihood of being asked about MAID for each wave based on characteristics including specialty and the number of unique patients they had provided care to. We re-ranked physicians in waves 2 and 3 based on responses from prior waves. Physicians were surveyed only once and there was no follow-up to preserve anonymity. Surveys assessed the proportion of respondents who participated in MAID activities (discussions, referrals, and/or prescriptions). We identified 6369 physicians that provided care to 2960 patients. In survey waves one, two, and three respectively, response rates (55%, 52%, and 55%; p = 0.98) and the proportion of respondents that participated in MAID activities (58%, 56%, and 42%; p = 0.05) were similar. Small adjustments made to physician ranking criteria in waves two and three did not increase the proportion of physicians that participated in MAID activities. We used a novel methodology using administrative data to identify and survey physicians at high likelihood of participating in MAID activities. We achieved good overall response rates (52%), and a high proportion of respondents that participated in MAID activities (52%), demonstrating that it is possible to overcome cost and anonymity barriers to conducting quantitative research on MAID. This methodology could be used in larger scale studies of MAID or other bioethical issues with “hidden” physician populations. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9001750/ /pubmed/35410431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09971-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kini, Vinay
Mosley, Bridget
Ressalam, Julie
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
Lum, Hillary D.
Kessler, Elizabeth R.
DeCamp, Matthew
Campbell, Eric G.
A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title_full A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title_fullStr A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title_full_unstemmed A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title_short A novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
title_sort novel methodology to identify and survey physicians participating in medical aid-in-dying
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35410431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09971-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kinivinay anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT mosleybridget anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT ressalamjulie anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT bolcicjankovicdragana anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT lumhillaryd anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT kesslerelizabethr anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT decampmatthew anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT campbellericg anovelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT kinivinay novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT mosleybridget novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT ressalamjulie novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT bolcicjankovicdragana novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT lumhillaryd novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT kesslerelizabethr novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT decampmatthew novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying
AT campbellericg novelmethodologytoidentifyandsurveyphysiciansparticipatinginmedicalaidindying