Cargando…
The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults
Prolonged trunk flexion is known to affect passive and active stabilization of the trunk. Previous studies have evaluated changes in spinal range of motion, muscle activity and reflex behavior induced by prolonged trunk flexion, whereas the effect on sitting postural control is vastly underexplored....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.868153 |
_version_ | 1784685780280541184 |
---|---|
author | Voglar, Matej Kozinc, Žiga Kingma, Idsart van Dieën, Jaap H. Šarabon, Nejc |
author_facet | Voglar, Matej Kozinc, Žiga Kingma, Idsart van Dieën, Jaap H. Šarabon, Nejc |
author_sort | Voglar, Matej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prolonged trunk flexion is known to affect passive and active stabilization of the trunk. Previous studies have evaluated changes in spinal range of motion, muscle activity and reflex behavior induced by prolonged trunk flexion, whereas the effect on sitting postural control is vastly underexplored. In this study, we compared the effects of supported and unsupported intermittent trunk flexion on center of pressure (CoP) motion during sitting on an unstable seat. Participants (n = 21; 11 males, 23.2 ± 2.0 years; 10 females, age 24.3 ± 4.0) were exposed to 1-h intermittent (60-s sets with 30 s of rest) trunk flexion (80% of the maximal range of motion) and CoP root mean square distance, velocity and frequency before and after the exposure were assessed. Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no main effects of exposure (pre. vs. post flexion protocol; p = 0.128–0.709), no main effects of condition (supported vs. unsupported; p = 0.134–0.931), and no interaction between exposure and condition (p = 0.163–0.912). Our results indicate that prolonged intermittent flexion does not induce any changes in CoP motion during a seated balance task, regardless of the presence of a trunk support during prolonged intermittent flexion. This suggests a successful compensation of decreased passive stiffness by increased reflex activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9001929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90019292022-04-13 The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults Voglar, Matej Kozinc, Žiga Kingma, Idsart van Dieën, Jaap H. Šarabon, Nejc Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Prolonged trunk flexion is known to affect passive and active stabilization of the trunk. Previous studies have evaluated changes in spinal range of motion, muscle activity and reflex behavior induced by prolonged trunk flexion, whereas the effect on sitting postural control is vastly underexplored. In this study, we compared the effects of supported and unsupported intermittent trunk flexion on center of pressure (CoP) motion during sitting on an unstable seat. Participants (n = 21; 11 males, 23.2 ± 2.0 years; 10 females, age 24.3 ± 4.0) were exposed to 1-h intermittent (60-s sets with 30 s of rest) trunk flexion (80% of the maximal range of motion) and CoP root mean square distance, velocity and frequency before and after the exposure were assessed. Contrary to our hypothesis, there were no main effects of exposure (pre. vs. post flexion protocol; p = 0.128–0.709), no main effects of condition (supported vs. unsupported; p = 0.134–0.931), and no interaction between exposure and condition (p = 0.163–0.912). Our results indicate that prolonged intermittent flexion does not induce any changes in CoP motion during a seated balance task, regardless of the presence of a trunk support during prolonged intermittent flexion. This suggests a successful compensation of decreased passive stiffness by increased reflex activity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9001929/ /pubmed/35422691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.868153 Text en Copyright © 2022 Voglar, Kozinc, Kingma, van Dieën and Šarabon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Voglar, Matej Kozinc, Žiga Kingma, Idsart van Dieën, Jaap H. Šarabon, Nejc The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title | The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title_full | The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title_short | The Effects of Intermittent Trunk Flexion With and Without Support on Sitting Balance in Young Adults |
title_sort | effects of intermittent trunk flexion with and without support on sitting balance in young adults |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9001929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35422691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.868153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT voglarmatej theeffectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT kozincziga theeffectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT kingmaidsart theeffectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT vandieenjaaph theeffectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT sarabonnejc theeffectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT voglarmatej effectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT kozincziga effectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT kingmaidsart effectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT vandieenjaaph effectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults AT sarabonnejc effectsofintermittenttrunkflexionwithandwithoutsupportonsittingbalanceinyoungadults |